Translating the science into practice: Shaping rehabilitation practice to enhance recovery after brain damage

Progress in Brain Research

Volumn 218, Issue , 2015, Pages 331-360

  Winstein, Carolee J ^a,b,c   Kay, Dorsa Beroukhim ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy support; Competence; Motivation; Neuroplasticity; Neurorehabilitation; Patient centered; Restorative therapies; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROREHABILITATION; NEUROSCIENCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENCE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; ANIMAL; BRAIN INJURIES; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BRAIN INJURIES; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION; HUMANS; NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84955720279     PISSN: 00796123     EISSN: 18757855     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.01.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (155)

1. Abe, M., Schambra, H., Wassermann, E.M., Luckenbaugh, D., Schweighofer, N., Cohen, L.G., 2011. Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains. Curr. Biol. 21, 557-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.030.
2. Adkins, D.L., Boychuk, J., Remple, M.S., Kleim, J.A., 2006. Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 1776-1782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00515.2006.
3. Adkins-Muir, D.L., Jones, T.A., 2003. Cortical electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitative training: enhanced functional recovery and dendritic plasticity following focal cortical ischemia in rats. Neurol. Res. 25, 780-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/016164103771953853.
4. Andrews, K., Stewart, J., 1979. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatology 18, 43-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43.
5. Askim, T., Indredavik, B., Vangberg, T., Håberg, A., 2009. Motor network changes associated with successful motor skill relearning after acute ischemic stroke: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 295-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308322840.
6. Avenanti, A., Bolognini, N., Maravita, A., Aglioti, S.M., 2007. Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Curr. Biol. 17, 2129-2135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.045.
7. Avenanti, A., Coccia, M., Ladavas, E., Provinciali, L., Ceravolo, M.G., 2012. Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial. Neurology 78, 256-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182436558.
8. Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.
9. Bandura, A., 2004. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ. Behav. 31, 143-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660.
10. Barbay, S., Plautz, E.J., Friel, K.M., Frost, S.B., Dancause, N., Stowe, A.M., Nudo, R.J., 2006. Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys. Exp. Brain Res. 169, 106-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0129-4.
11. Barker, R.N., Brauer, S.G., 2005. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil. Rehabil. 27, 1213-1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280500075717.
12. Barker, R.N., Gill, T.J., Brauer, S.G., 2007. Factors contributing to upper limb recovery after stroke: a survey of stroke survivors in Queensland Australia. Disabil. Rehabil. 29, 981-989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280500243570.
13. Bernstein, N., 1967. The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Pergamon Press, London, Oxford.
14. Biernaskie, J., Chernenko, G., Corbett, D., 2004. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 24, 1245-1254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3834-03.2004.
15. Birkenmeier, R.L., Prager, E.M., Lang, C.E., 2010. Translating animal doses of task-specific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 24, 620-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968310361957.
16. Brown, J.A., Lutsep, H., Cramer, S.C., Weinand, M., 2003. Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: a case report. Neurol. Res. 25, 815-818.
17. Brown, J.A., Lutsep, H.L., Weinand, M., Cramer, S.C., 2006. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery 58, 464-473.
18. Carey, J.R., Bhatt, E., Nagpal, A., 2005. Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 33, 24-31.
19. Celnik, P., Webster, B., Glasser, D., Cohen, L.G., 2008. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke 39, 1814-1820.
20. Chan, D.Y., Chan, C.C., Au, D.K., 2006. Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 20, 191-200.
21. Chen, S.Y., 2011. The influence of self-efficacy on recovery of spontaneous arm use in hemiparetic stroke (Doctoral dissertation).
22. Chen, S.Y., Winstein, C.J., 2009. A systematic review of voluntary arm recovery in hemiparetic stroke: critical predictors for meaningful outcomes using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 33, 2-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e318198a010.
23. Chen, S., Lewthwaite, R., Schweighofer, N., Winstein, C.J., 2013. Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. J. Hand Ther. 26, 116-123.
24. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., 2012a. Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Front. Psychol. 3, 458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458.
25. Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., Campos, T., 2012b. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 35, 601-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003,S0966-6362(11)00802-2 [pii].
26. Collins, F., Tabak, L., 2014. NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 505, 612-613.
27. Corti, M., McGuirk, T.E., Wu, S.S., Patten, C., 2012. Differential effects of power training versus functional task practice on compensation and restoration of arm function after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 842-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968311433426.
28. Cowles, T., Clark, A., Mares, K., Peryer, G., Stuck, R., Pomeroy, V., 2013. Observation-toimitate plus practice could add little to physical therapy benefits within 31 days of stroke: translational randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 173-182.
29. Cross, E.S., Schmitt, P.J., Grafton, S.T., 2007. Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19, 1854-1871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1854.
30. Cross, E.S., Kraemer, D.J., Hamilton, A.F., Kelley, W.M., Grafton, S.T., 2009. Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cereb. Cortex 19, 315-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn083.
31. Dancause, N., Nudo, R.J., 2011. Shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after injury. Prog. Brain Res. 192, 273-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00015-4.
32. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., 2000. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227-268.
33. Dinstein, I., Thomas, C., Behrmann, M., Heeger, D.J., 2008. A mirror up to nature. Curr. Biol. 18, R13-R18.
34. Dobkin, B.H., 2005. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1677-1684.
35. Dobkin, B.H., 2009. Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve phase III trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 197-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968309331863.
36. Dobkin, B.H., Plummer-D'Amato, P., Elashoff, R., Lee, J., 2010. International randomized clinical trial: Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation with Reinforcement of Walking Speed (SIRROWS), improves outcomes. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 24, 235-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968309357558.
37. Dromerick, A.W., Edwards, D.F., Diringer, M.N., 2003. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 40, 1-8.
38. Duncan, P., Velozo, C., 2007. State-of-the-science on postacute rehabilitation: measurement and methodologies for assessing quality and establishing policy for postacute care. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 1482-1487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.118.
39. Duncan, P.W., Jorgensen, H.S., Wade, D.T., 2000. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 31, 1429-1438.
40. Duncan, P., Studenski, S., Richards, L., Gollub, S., Lai, S.M., Reker, D., Perera, S., Yates, J., Koch, V., Rigler, S., Johnson, D., 2003. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke 34, 2173-2180.
41. Dweck, C.S., Leggett, E.L., 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95, 256-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.
42. Egan, M., Davis, C.G., Dubouloz, C.J., Kessler, D., Kubina, L.A., 2014. Participation and well-being poststroke: evidence of reciprocal effects. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 95, 262-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.013.
43. Ertelt, D., Small, S., Solodkin, A., Dettmers, C., McNamara, A., Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., 2007. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage 36, T164-T173.
44. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., Rizzolatti, G., 1995. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 2608-2611.
45. Fritz, S.L., George, S.Z., Wolf, S.L., Light, K.E., 2007. Participant perception of recovery as criterion to establish importance of improvement for constraint-induced movement therapy outcome measures: a preliminary study. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 87, 170-178.
46. Garrison, K.A., Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wong, S.W., Liew, S.-L., Winstein, C.J., 2013. Modulating the motor system by action observation after stroke. Stroke 44, 2247-2253.
47. Goh, H.-T., Sullivan, K.J., Gordon, J., Wulf, G., Winstein, C.J., 2012. Dual-task practice enhances motor learning: a preliminary investigation. Exp. Brain Res. 222, 201-210.
48. Granados, C., Wulf, G., 2007. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 78, 197-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0270,1367.2007.10599417.
49. Han, C.E., Kim, S., Chen, S., Lai, Y.H., Lee, J.Y., Osu, R., Winstein, C.J., Schweighofer, N., 2013. Quantifying arm nonuse in individuals poststroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 439-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968312471904.
50. Hanlon, R.E., 1996. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 77, 811-815.
51. Hart, T., Bagiella, E., 2012. Design and implementation of clinical trials in rehabilitation research. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, S117-S126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.039.
52. Harvey, R.L., Winstein, C.J., 2008. Design for the Everest randomized trial of cortical stimulation and rehabilitation for arm function following stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 32-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308317532.
53. Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J., Mazziotta, J.C., 2003. The essential role of Broca's area in imitation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 1123-1128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02530.x.
54. Hellstrom, K., Lindmark, B., Wahlberg, B., Fugl-Meyer, A.R., 2003. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. J. Rehabil. Med. 35, 202-207.
55. Hidaka, Y., Han, C.E., Wolf, S.L., Winstein, C.J., Schweighofer, N., 2012. Use it and improve it or lose it: interactions between arm function and use in humans post-stroke. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002343.
56. Hosp, J.A., Pekanovic, A., Rioult-Pedotti, M.S., Luft, A.R., 2011. Dopaminergic projections from midbrain to primary motor cortex mediate motor skill learning. J. Neurosci. 31, 2481-2487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/Jneurosci.5411-10.2011.
57. Hsu, J.E., Jones, T.A., 2005. Time-sensitive enhancement of motor learning with the lessaffected forelimb after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 2069-2080.
58. Huang, M., Harvey, R.L., Stoykov, M.E., Ruland, S., Weinand, M., Lowry, D., Levy, R., 2008. Cortical stimulation for upper limb recovery following ischemic stroke: a small phase II pilot study of a fully implanted stimulator. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 15, 160-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1502-160.
59. Institute of Medicine, 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new Health Care System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
60. Institute of Medicine, 2012. Envisioning a Transformed Clinical Trials Enterprise in the United States: Establishing an Agenda for 2020. IOM, Washington, DC.
61. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Health and Behavior: Research, Practice and Policy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, 2001. Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
62. James, G.A., Lu, Z.L., VanMeter, J.W., Sathian, K., Hu, X.P., Butler, A.J., 2009. Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 16, 270-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1604-270, 6361874157U18PVT [pii].
63. Jones, F., Riazi, A., 2011. Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil. 33, 797-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.511415.
64. Jonsson, A.C., Lindgren, I., Hallstrom, B., Norrving, B., Lindgren, A., 2005. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke 36, 803-808.
65. Kantak, S.S., Winstein, C.J., 2012. Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav. Brain Res. 228, 219-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028.
66. Karni, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M.M., Turner, R., Ungerleider, L.G., 1995. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377, 155-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/377155a0.
67. Keetch, K.M., Schmidt, R.A., Lee, T.D., Young, D.E., 2005. Especial skills: their emergence with massive amounts of practice. J. Exp. Psychol. 31, 970-978.
68. Kempf, T., Corcos, D.M., Flament, D., 2001. Time course and temporal order of changes in movement kinematics during motor learning: effect of joint and instruction. Exp. Brain Res. 136, 295-302.
69. Kitago, T., Krakauer, J.W., 2013. Chapter 8: motor learning principles for neurorehabilitation. In: Barnes, M.P., Good, D.C. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
70. Kitago, T., Liang, J., Huang, V.S., et al., 2013. Improvement after constraint-induced movement therapy: recovery of normal motor control or task-specific compensation? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 99-109.
71. Klamroth-Marganska, V., Blanco, J., Campen, K., Curt, A., Dietz, V., Ettlin, T., Felder, M., Fellinghauer, B., Guidali, M., Kollmar, A., Luft, A., Nef, T., Schuster-Amft, C., Stahel, W., Riener, R., 2014. Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 13, 159-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70305-3.
72. Kleim, J.A., 2012. Neural Plasticity: Foundations for Neurorehabilitation. Tanas Publishing, Arizona.
73. Kleim, J.A., Jones, T.A., 2008. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 51, S225-S239.
74. Kleim, J.A., Jones, T.A., Schallert, T., 2003. Motor enrichment and the induction of plasticity before or after brain injury. Neurochem. Res. 28, 1757-1769.
75. Kojovic, M., Mir, P., Trender-Gerhard, I., Schneider, S.A., Pareés, I., Edwards, M.J., Bhatia, K.P., Jahanshahi, M., 2014. Motivational modulation of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease off and on dopaminergic medication. J. Neurol. 261, 1080-1089.
76. Krakauer, J.W., Carmichael, S.T., Corbett, D., Wittenberg, G.F., 2012. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 923-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968312440745.
77. Kwon, S., Hartzema, A.G., Duncan, P.W., Min-Lai, S., 2004. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel index, the functional independence measure, and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke 35, 918-923.
78. Lee, T.D., Wishart, L.R., 2005a. Motor learning conundrums. Quest 57, 67-78.
79. Lee, T.D., Wishart, L.R., 2005b. Motor learning conundrums (and possible solutions). Quest 57, 67-78.
80. Lee, T.D., Swanson, L.R., Hall, A.L., 1991. What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 71, 150-156.
81. Lee, T.D., Swinnen, S.P., Serrien, D.J., 1994. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46, 328-344.
82. Levin, M.F., Kleim, J.A., Wolf, S.L., 2009. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 23, 313-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968308328727, 1545968308328727 [pii].
83. Levy, R., Ruland, S., Weinard, M., Lowry, D., Dafer, R., Bakery, R., 2008. Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy. J. Neurosurg. 108, 707-714.
84. Lewthwaite, R., Wulf, G., 2010. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 63, 738-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111839.
85. Lewthwaite, R., Wulf, G., 2012. Motor learning through a motivational lens. In: Hodges, N.J., Williams, A.M. (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport. Routledge, London.
86. Lo, A.C., Guarino, P.D., Richards, L.G., Haselkorn, J.K., Wittenberg, G.F., Federman, D.G., Ringer, R.J., Wagner, T.H., Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Bever Jr., C.T., Bravata, D.M., Duncan, P.W., Corn, B.H., Maffucci, A.D., Nadeau, S.E., Conroy, S.S., Powell, J.M., Huang, G.D., Peduzzi, P., 2010. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1772-1783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0911341.
87. Lum, P.S., Mulroy, S., Amdur, R.L., 2009. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 16, 237-253.
88. Maclean, N., Pound, P., 2000. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc. Sci. Med. 50, 495-506, doi: S0277953699003342 [pii].
89. Mahoney, F.I., Barthel, D.W., 1965. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md. State Med. J. 14, 61-65.
90. Maldonado, M.A., Allred, R.P., Felthauser, E.L., Jones, T.A., 2008. Motor skill training, but not voluntary exercise, improves skilled reaching after unilateral ischemic lesions of the sensorimotor cortex in rats. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 22, 250-261.
91. Marteniuk, R.G., Leavitt, J.L., MacKenzie, C.L., Athenes, S., 1990. Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum. Mov. Sci. 9, 149-176.
92. Mayo, N.E., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Cote, R., Durcan, L., Carlton, J., 2002. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 1035-1042.
93. McKay, B., Lewthwaite, R., Wulf, G., 2012. Enhanced expectancies improve performance under pressure. Front. Psychol. 3, 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00008.
94. Mendelsohn, A., Pine, A., Schiller, D., 2014. Between thoughts and actions: motivationally salient cues invigorate mental action in the human brain. Neuron 81, 207-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.019.
95. Michaelsen, S.M., Levin, M.F., 2004. Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 35, 1914-1919.
96. Michielsen, M.E., Selles, R.W., Stam, H.J., Ribbers, G.M., Bussmann, J.B., 2012. Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upperlimb use in daily life. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 1975-1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016.
97. Murphy, T.H., Corbett, D., 2009. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 861-872.
98. Nelles, G., Jentzen, W., Jueptner, M., Muller, S., Diener, H.C., 2001. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 13, 1146-1154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0757.
99. NINDS, 2012. Final report of the stroke progress review group-January 2012 [WWW document]. URL, http://www.ninds.nih.gov/about_ninds/groups/stroke_prg/01-2012-stroke-prg-report.htm.
100. Nishimura, Y., Onoe, H., Onoe, K., Morichika, Y., Tsukada, H., Isa, T., 2011. Neural substrates for the motivational regulation of motor recovery after spinal-cord injury. PLoS One 6, e24854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024854.
101. Nudo, R.J., 2003. Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 14, S57-S76.
102. Nudo, R.J., Milliken, G.W., Jenkins, W.M., Merzenich, M.M., 1996a. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J. Neurosci. 16, 785-807.
103. Nudo, R.J., Wise, B.M., SiFuentes, F., Milliken, G.W., 1996b. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272, 1791-1794. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5269.1791.
104. Page, S.J., Levine, P., 2007. Modified constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke exhibiting minimal movement ability in the affected arm. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 87, 872-878.
105. Panarese, A., Colombo, R., Sterpi, I., Pisano, F., Micera, S., 2012. Tracking motor improvement at the subtask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 822-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968311431966, 1545968311431966 [pii].
106. Platz, T., Bock, S., Prass, K., 2001. Reduced skilfulness of arm motor behaviour among motor stroke patients with good clinical recovery: does it indicate reduced automaticity? Can it be improved by unilateral or bilateral training? A kinematic motion analysis study. Neuropsychologia 39, 687-698.
107. Platz, T., van Kaick, S., Moller, L., Freund, S., Winter, T., Kim, I.H., 2005. Impairmentoriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study. J. Neurol. 252, 1363-1371.
108. Plautz, E.J., Milliken, G.W., Nudo, R.J., 2000. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 74, 27-55.
109. Plow, E.B., Carey, J.R., Nudo, R.J., Pascual-Leone, A., 2009. Invasive cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke: a critical appraisal. Stroke 40, 1926-1931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.108.540823.
110. Pomeroy, V.M., Clark, C.A., Miller, J.S., Baron, J.C., Markus, H.S., Tallis, R.C., 2005. The potential for utilizing the "mirror neurone system" to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 19, 4-13.
111. Robinson-Smith, G., Pizzi, E.R., 2003. Maximizing stroke recovery using patient self-care self-efficacy. Rehabil. Nurs. 28, 48-51.
112. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68-78.
113. Sabini, R.C., Dijkers, M.P., Raghavan, P., 2013. Stroke survivors talk while doing: development of a therapeutic framework for continued rehabilitation of hand function post stroke. J. Hand Ther. 26, 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2012.08.002, quiz 131.
114. Sadtler, P.T., Quick, K.M., Golub, M.D., Chase, S.M., Ryu, S.I., Tyler-Kabara, E.C., Yu, B.M., Batista, A.P., 2014. Neural constraints on learning. Nature 512, 423-426.
115. Salbach, N.M., Mayo, N.E., Robichaud-Ekstrand, S., Hanley, J.A., Richards, C.L., Wood-Dauphinee, S., 2006. Balance self-efficacy and its relevance to physical function and perceived health status after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, 364-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.017.
116. Sanger, T.D., 2004. Failure of motor learning for large initial errors. Neural Comput. 16, 1873-1886.
117. Schaefer, S.Y., Patterson, C.B., Lang, C.E., 2013. Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: implications for task-specific approaches to upper extremity neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 602-612.
118. Schmidt, R.A., Lee, T.D., 2011. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, fifth ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
119. Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., 1987. Transfer of Movement Control in Motor Skill Learning: Transfer of Learning. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
120. Schweighofer, N., Lee, J.-Y., Goh, H.-T., Choi, Y., Kim, S., Stewart, J.C., Lewthwaite, R., Winstein, C.J., 2011. Mechanisms of the contextual interference effect in individuals poststroke. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 2632-2641.
121. Shaikh, T., Goussev, V., Feldman, A.G., Levin, M.F., 2013. Arm-trunk coordination for beyond-the-reach movements in adults with stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 28, 355-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968313510973.
122. Shea, C.H., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C., 1999. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training. J. Mot. Behav. 31, 119-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222899909600983.
123. Sterr, A., Freivogel, S., Schmalohr, D., 2002. Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83, 1726-1731.
124. Stewart, J.C., Cramer, S.C., 2013. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke. Stroke 44, 1111-1116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671.
125. Suenkeler, I.H., Nowak, M., Misselwitz, B., Kugler, C., Schreiber, W., Oertel, W.H., Back, T., 2002. Timecourse of health-related quality of life as determined 3, 6 and 12 months after stroke. Relationship to neurological deficit, disability and depression. J. Neurol. 249, 1160-1167.
126. Sunderland, A., Tuke, A., 2005. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 15, 81-96.
127. Takebayashi, T., Koyama, T., Amano, S., Hanada, K., Tabusadani, M., Hosomi, M., Marumoto, K., Takahashi, K., Domen, K., 2013. A 6-month follow-up after constraintinduced movement therapy with and without transfer package for patients with hemiparesis after stroke: a pilot quasi-randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 27, 418-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215512460779.
128. Tan, C., Tretriluxana, J., Pitsch, E., Runnarong, N., Winstein, C.J., 2012. Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp: a pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 26, 957-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968312437938.
129. Taub, E., Crago, J.E., Burgio, L.D., Groomes, T.E., Cook 3rd., E.W., DeLuca, S.C., Miller, N.E., 1994. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 61, 281-293.
130. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., King, D.K., Morris, D., Crago, J.E., Chatterjee, A., 2006a. A placebocontrolled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 37, 1045-1049.
131. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Mark, V.W., Morris, D.M., 2006b. The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys 42, 241-256.
132. Tennant, K.A., Adkins, D.L., Scalco, M.D., Donlan, N.A., Asay, A.L., Thomas, N., Kleim, J.A., Jones, T.A., 2012. Skill learning induced plasticity of motor cortical representations is time and age-dependent. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 98, 291-302.
133. Teskey, G.C., Flynn, C., Goertzen, C.D., Monfils, M.H., Young, N.A., 2003. Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat. Neurol. Res. 25, 794-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/016164103771953871.
134. Thielman, G., 2004. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise1, *1. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1613-1618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.01.028.
135. Thielman, G.T., Dean, C.M., Gentile, A.M., 2004. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: taskrelated training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1613-1618, doi:S0003999304002916 [pii].
136. Thorndike, E.L., 1913. Educational Psychology. Columbia University Press, New York.
137. Tremblay, L., Proteau, L., 1998. Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 69, 284-289.
138. Tretriluxana, J., Runnarong, N., Tretriluxana, S., Prayoonwiwat, N., Vachalathiti, R., Winstein, C., 2013. Feasibility investigation of the accelerated skill acquisition program (ASAP): insights into reach-to-grasp coordination of individuals with postacute stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 20, 151-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr2002-151.
139. Trombly, C.A., Wu, C.Y., 1999. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 53, 333-344.
140. Van Delden, A.L., Peper, C.L., Nienhuys, K.N., Zijp, N.I., Beek, P.J., Kwakkel, G., 2013. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb training after stroke: the upper limb training after stroke clinical trial. Stroke 44, 2613-2616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001969.
141. Van Kordelaar, J., van Wegen, E.E., Nijland, R.H., de Groot, J.H., Meskers, C.G., Harlaar, J., Kwakkel, G., 2012. Assessing longitudinal change in coordination of the paretic upper limb using on-site 3-dimensional kinematic measurements. Phys. Ther. 92, 142-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100341, ptj.20100341 [pii].
142. Wade, E., Winstein, C.J., 2011. Virtual reality and robotics for stroke rehabilitation: where do we go from here? Top. Stroke Rehabil. 18, 685-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1806-685, 6J70613753H22976 [pii].
143. Weir, P.L., MacKenzie, C.L., Marteniuk, R.G., Cargoe, S.L., 1991. Is object texture a constraint on human prehension-kinematic evidence. J. Mot. Behav. 23, 205-210.
144. WHO, 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization (WHO), New York, NY.
145. Winstein, C.J., 2004. Why is functional independence (FIM) used to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors? Physiother. Res. Int. 9, 182-184.
146. Winstein, C.J., Merians, A.S., Sullivan, K.J., 1999. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia 37, 975-987.
147. Winstein, C.J., Rose, D.K., Tan, S.M., Lewthwaite, R., Chui, H.C., Azen, S.P., 2004. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 620-628, doi:S0003999303009882 [pii].
148. Winstein, C.J., Wolf, S.L., Dromerick, A.W., Lane, C.J., Nelsen, M.A., Lewthwaite, R., Blanton, S., Scott, C., Reiss, A., Cen, S.Y., Holley, R., Azen, S.P., Team, I.I., 2013a. Interdisciplinary comprehensive arm rehabilitation evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Neurol. 13, 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-5.
149. Winstein, C.J., Wolf, S.L., Dromerick, A.W., Lane, C.J., Nelsen, M.A., Lewthwaite, R., Blanton, S., Scott, C., Reiss, A., Cen, S.Y., Holley, R., Azen, S.P., Team, I.I., 2013b. Interdisciplinary comprehensive arm rehabilitation evaluation (ICARE): a randomized controlled trial protocol [supplementary material]. BMC Neurol. 13, 5.
150. Winstein, C.J., Lewthwaite, R., Blanton, S.R., Wolf, L.B., Wishart, L., 2014. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 38, 190-200.
151. Winstein, C.J., Wolf, S.L., Schweighofer, N., 2015. Task-oriented training to promote upper extremity recovery. In: Stein, J., Harvey, R.L., Winstein, C.J., Zorowitz, R.D., Wittenberg, G.F. (Eds.), Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Demos Medical, New York, pp. 320-343.
152. Wu, C., Trombly, C.A., Lin, K., Tickle-Degnen, L., 1998. Effects of object affordances on reaching performance in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 52, 447-456.
153. Wu, C.Y., Trombly, C.A., Lin, K.C., Tickle-Degnen, L., 2000. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 81, 95-101.
154. Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., 2009. Conceptions of ability affect motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 41, 461-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/35-08-083.
155. Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., Lewthwaite, R., 2012. Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychol. Aging 27, 14-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025718.