Neural constraints on learning

Nature

Volumn 512, Issue 7515, 2014, Pages 423-426

  Sadtler, Patrick T ^a,b,c   Quick, Kristin M ^a,b,c   Golub, Matthew D ^b,d   Chase, Steven M ^b,d   Ryu, Stephen I ^e,f   Tyler Kabara, Elizabeth C ^a,g   Yu, Byron M ^b,d   Batista, Aaron P ^a,b,c  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR THE NEURAL BASIS OF COGNITION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Stanford University   (United States)

^f PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; LEARNING; NEUROLOGY; PRIMATE; TIMESCALE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; HAND MOVEMENT; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MALE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; COMPUTERS; LEARNING; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS; NERVE NET; NEURONS;

EID: 84907404533     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13665     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Krakauer, J. W. & Mazzoni, P. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 636-644 (2011).
2. Ranganathan, R., Wieser, J., Mosier, K. M., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. & Scheidt, R. A. Learning redundant motor tasks with and without overlapping dimensions: facilitation and interference effects. J. Neurosci. 34, 8289-8299 (2014).
3. Thoroughman, K. & Taylor, J. Rapid reshaping of human motor generalization. J. Neurosci. 25, 8948-8953 (2005).
4. Braun, D., Mehring, C. & Wolpert, D. Structure learning in action. Behav. Brain Res. 206, 157-165 (2010).
5. Ganguly, K. & Carmena, J. M. Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000153 (2009).
6. Fetz, E. E. Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity. Science 163, 955-958 (1969).
7. Jarosiewicz, B. et al. Functional network reorganization during learning in a brain-computer interface paradigm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19486-19491 (2008).
8. Hwang, E. J., Bailey, P. M.&Andersen, R. A. Volitional control of neural activity relies on the natural motor repertoire. Curr. Biol. 23, 353-361 (2013).
9. Rouse, A. G., Williams, J. J., Wheeler, J. J. & Moran, D. W. Cortical adaptation to a chronic micro-electrocorticographic brain computer interface. J. Neurosci. 33, 1326-1330 (2013).
10. Engelhard, B., Ozeri, N., Israel, Z., Bergman, H. & Vaadia, E. Inducing c oscillations and precise spike synchrony by operant conditioning via brain-machine interface. Neuron 77, 361-375 (2013).
11. Cunningham, J. P. & Yu, B. M. Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings. Nature Neurosci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn. 3776.
12. Mazor, O. & Laurent, G. Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48, 661-673 (2005).
13. Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V. & Newsome, W. T. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature 503, 78-84 (2013).
14. Rigotti, M. et al. The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature 497, 585-590 (2013).
15. Churchland, M. M. et al. Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature 487, 51-56 (2012).
16. Luczak, A., Bartho?, P. & Harris, K. D. Spontaneous events outline the realm of possible sensory responses in neocortical populations. Neuron 62, 413-425 (2009).
17. Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. & Krakauer, J. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 89-108 (2010).
18. Li, C. S., Padoa-Schioppa, C. & Bizzi, E. Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron 30, 593-607 (2001).
19. Salinas, E. Fast remapping of sensory stimuli onto motor actions on the basis of contextual modulation. J. Neurosci. 24, 1113-1118 (2004).
20. Picard, N., Matsuzaka, Y. & Strick, P. L. Extended practice of a motor skill is associated with reduced metabolic activity in M1. Nature Neurosci. 16, 1340-1347 (2013).
21. Rioult-Pedotti, M.-S., Friedman, D. & Donoghue, J. P. Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science 290, 533-536 (2000).
22. Peters, A. J., Chen, S. X.&Komiyama, T.Emergence of reproducible spatiotemporal activity during motor learning. Nature 510, 263-267 (2014).
23. Paz, R., Natan, C., Boraud, T., Bergman, H. & Vaadia, E. Emerging patterns of neuronal responses in supplementary and primary motor areas during sensorimotor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 25, 10941-10951 (2005).
24. Durstewitz, D., Vittoz, N. M., Floresco, S. B. & Seamans, J. K. Abrupt transitions between prefrontal neural ensemble states accompany behavioral transitions during rule learning. Neuron 66, 438-448 (2010).
25. Jeanne, J. M., Sharpee, T. O. & Gentner, T. Q. Associative learning enhances population coding by inverting interneuronal correlation patterns. Neuron 78, 352-363 (2013).
26. Gu, Y. et al. Perceptual learning reduces interneuronal correlations in macaque visual cortex. Neuron 71, 750-761 (2011).
27. Ingvalson, E. M., Holt, L. L.& McClelland, J. L. Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate/r-l/on the basis of F3 onset frequency? Biling. Lang. Cogn. 15, 255-274 (2012).
28. Park, D. C. et al. The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: the Synapse Project. Psychol. Sci. 25, 103-112 (2014).
29. Boden, M. A. Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 103, 347-356 (1998).
30. Ajemian, R., D'Ausilio, A., Moorman, H. & Bizzi, E. A theory for how sensorimotor skills are learned andretained in noisy and nonstationary neural circuits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E5078-E5087 (2013).
31. Tkach, D. C., Reimer, J. & Hatsopoulos, N. G. Observation-based learning for brain-machine Interfaces. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 589-594 (2008).
32. Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M. C., Whitford, A. S. & Schwartz, A. B. Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 453, 1098-1101 (2008).
33. Santhanam, G. et al. Factor-analysis methods for higher-performance neural prostheses. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 1315-1330 (2009).
34. Yu, B. M. et al. Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 614-635 (2009).
35. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. & Rubin, D. B. Maximumlikelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. [Ser A] 39, 1-38 (1977).
36. Wu, W.,Gao, Y., Bienenstock,E.,Donoghue, J. P.&Black, M. J.Bayesian population decoding of motor cortical activity using a Kalman filter. Neural Comput. 18, 80-118 (2006).
37. Gilja, V. et al. A high-performance neural prosthesis enabled by control algorithm design. Nature Neurosci. 15, 1752-1757 (2012).
38. Bjorck A. & Golub, G. H. Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces. Math. Comput. 27, 579-594 (1973).
39. Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 47, 381-391 (1954).