A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 620-628

  Winstein, Carolee J ^a,b   Rose, Dorian K ^a   Tan, Sylvia M ^b   Lewthwaite, Rebecca ^a,c   Chui, Helena C ^b,c   Azen, Stanley P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RANCHO LOS AMIGOS NATIONAL REHABILITATION CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Randomized controlled trials; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARM DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HOSPITAL; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT; PILOT STUDY; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARD; STRENGTH; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TORQUE; TRAINING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2342464858     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.027     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kelly-Hayes M., Robertson J.T., Broderick J.P., et al. The American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification. Stroke. 29:1998;1274-1280
2. American Heart Association. Heart and stroke statistics - 2003 update. 2002;AHA, Dallas
3. Wagenaar R.C. Effects of stroke rehabilitation. Kaufman T. Rehabilitation of the geriatric patient. 2000;130-134 Churchill Livingstone, New York
4. Foulkes M.A., Wolf P.A., Price T.R., Mohr J.P., Hier D.B. The Stroke Data Bank design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke. 19:1988;547-554
5. Duncan P.W., Goldstein L.B., Horner R.D., Landsman P.B., Samsa G.P., Matchar D.B. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke. 25:1994;1181-1188
6. Ostwald S.K., Snowdon D.A., Rysavy S.D., Keenan N.L., Kane R.L. Manual dexterity as a correlate of dependency in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 37:1989;963-969
7. Olsen T.S. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 21:1990;247-251
8. Wade D.T., Hewer R.L., Wood V.A., Skilbeck C.E., Ismail H.M. The hemiplegic arm after stroke measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 46:1983;521-524
9. Nakayama H., Jorgensen H.S., Raaschou H.O., Olson T.S. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 75:1994;394-398
10. Duncan P.W. Synthesis of intervention trials to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 3:1997;1-20
11. van der Lee J.H., Wagenaar R.C., Lankhorst G.J., Vogelaar T.W., Deville W.L., Bouter L.M. Forced-use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 30:1999;2369-2375
12. Dromerick A.W., Edwards D., Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 31:2000;2984-2988
13. Page S.J., Sisto S., Johnston M.V., Levine P., Hughes M. Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 83:2002;286-290
14. Butefisch C., Hummelsheim H., Denzler P., Mauritz K.H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 130:1995;59-68
15. Winstein C.J., Rose D.K., Chui H.C., et al. Recovery and rehabilitation of arm use after stroke. [abstract] J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 10:2001;197
16. Rose D.K., Winstein C.J., Tan S.M., Azen S.P., Chui H.C. Comparison of upper extremity intervention strategies at six and nine months post-stroke. [abstract] Neurol Rep. 25:2001;130
17. Hamilton B.B., Granger C.V. Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther. 74:1994;494-503
18. Kalra L., Crome P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 41:1993;396-400
19. Sanford J., Moreland J., Swanson L.R., Statford P.W., Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 73:1993;447-454
20. Bohannon R., Smith M.B. Assessment of strength deficits in eight paretic upper extremity muscle groups of stroke patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 67:1987;522-525
21. Wilson D.J., Baker L.L., Craddock J.A. Functional test for the hemiparetic upper extremity. Am J Occup Ther. 38:1984;159-164
22. Wilson D.J., Baker L.L., Craddock J.A. Protocol - functional test for the hemiplegic/paretic upper extremity. 1984;Los Amigos Research and Education Institute, Downy (CA)
23. Davies P.M. Steps to follow a guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. 1985;Springer, Berlin
24. Winstein C.J. Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation. Duncan P.W., Badke M.B. Stroke rehabilitation the recovery of motor control. 1987;109-134 Year Book Medical, Chicago
25. Hanlon R.E. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 77:1996;811-815
26. Lincoln N.B., Parry R.H., Vass C.D. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 30:1999;573-579
27. Nudo R.J., Wise B.M., SiFuentes F., Milliken G.W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 272:1996;1791-1794
28. Tangeman P.T., Banaitis D.A., Williams A.K. Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 71:1990;876-880
29. Taub E., Miller N.E., Novack T.A., et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 74:1993;347-354
30. Shelton F.D., Volpe B.T., Reding M. Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 15:2001;229-237
31. Parry R.H., Lincoln N.B., Vass C.D. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 13:1999;187-198
32. Partridge C., Mackenzie M., Edwards S., et al. Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Physiother Res Int. 5:2000;230-240
33. Barreca S., Wolf S.L., Fasoli S., Bohannon R. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors a critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 17:2003;220-226
34. De Weerdt W., Feys H. Assessment of physiotherapy for patients with stroke. [comment] Lancet. 359:2002;182-183
35. Keith A.R. Treatment strength in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 78:1997;1298-1304
36. Kwakkel G., Wagenaar R.C., Twisk J.W., Lankhorst G.J., Koetsier J.C. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral artery stroke a randomized trial. Lancet. 354:1999;191-196
37. Lin K.C., Wu C.Y., Tickle-Degnen L., Coster W. Enhancing occupational performance through occupationally embedded exercise a meta-analytic review. Occup Ther J Res. 17:1997;25-47
38. Watson G. Neuromuscular physiotherapy encouraging self-management. Physiotherapy. 82:1996;352-357
39. Ma H.I., Trombly C.A., Robinson-Podolski C. The effect of context on skill acquisition and transfer. Am J Occup Ther. 53:1999;138-144
40. Sunderland A., Fletcher D., Bradley L., Tinson D., Hewer R.L., Wade D.T. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke a one year follow-up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 57:1994;856-858
41. Winstein C.J., Wing A.M., Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. Grafman J., Robertson I. Plasticity and rehabilitation. Vol 9:2003;77-137 Elsevier Science, Amsterdam