Motor learning after unilateral brain damage

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 975-987

  Winstein, Carolee J ^a   Merians, Alma S ^b   Sullivan, Katherine J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arm; Motor control; Psychomotorperformance; Recovery; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; REVIEW; STROKE;

EID: 0033029163     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00145-6     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history ofclinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521-26.
2. Behrman AL, Vander Linden DW, Cauraugh JH. Relative frequency knowledge of results: Olderadults learning a force-time modulation task. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1992;23:233-50.
3. Bondi MW, Kaszniak AW, Rapscsak SZ, Butters MA. Implicit and explicit memory followinganterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture. Brain and Cognition 1993;22:213-29.
4. Bonita R, Beaglehole, R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke 1988;19:1497-1500.
5. Burke DM, Light LL. Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychological Bulletin1981;90:513-46.
6. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz K-H. Repetitive trainingof isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.J Neurolog Science 1995;130:59-68.
7. Canavan AGM, Sprengelmeyer R, Diener H-C, Homberg V. Conditional associative learning isimpaired in cerebellar disease in humans. Behavioral Neuroscience 1994;108:474-85.
8. Cheyne D, Weinberg H, Gaetz W, Jantzen KJ. Motor cortex activity and predicting side ofmovement: neural network and dipole analysis of pre-movement magnetic fields. NeuroscienceLetters 1995;188:81-4.
9. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJS, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RSJ. The functional anatomyof motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with position emission tomography. Annals ofNeurology 1991;29:63-71.
10. Clark M, Merians AS, Kothari A, Poizner H, Macauley B, Rothi LJG, Heilman KM. Spatialplanning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1994;117:1093-106.
11. Cushman L, Caplan B. Multiple memory systems: Evidence from stroke. Perceptual and MotorSkills 1987;64:571-7.
12. Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, Ermani M, Pizzolato G, Iaia V, Battistin L. The effects of long-termrehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993;24:1186-91.
13. Deiber M-P, Passingham RE, Colebatch JG, Friston KJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RSJ. Cortical areasand the selection of movement: A study with positron emission tomography. Experimental BrainResearch 1991;84:393-402.
14. Dick MB, Shankle RW, Beth RE, Dick-Muehlke C, Cotman CW, Kean, M-L. Acquisition andlong-term retention of a gross motor skill in Alzheimers disease patients under constant and variedpractice conditions. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 1996;51B:P103-P111.
15. Dixon WJ. BMDP Statistical Software Manual, Vol. 2. Los Angeles: University of California Press,1992.
16. Doyon J, Owen AM, Petrides M, Sziklas V, Evans AC. Functional anatomy of visuomotor skilllearning in human subjects examined with positron emission tomography. European J Neuroscience1996;8:637-48.
17. Doyon J, Gaudreau D, Laforce R, Castonguay M, Bedard PJ, Bedard F, Bouchard J-P. Role of thestriatum, cerebellum, frontal lobes in the learning of a visuomotor sequence. Brain and Cognition1997;34:218-45.
18. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motorrecovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1181-8.
19. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recoveryafter stroke. Stroke 1992;23:1084-9.
20. Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human Performance. Belmont, CA: BrooksCole, 1967.
21. Goodale MA. Hemispheric differences in motor control. Behavioral Brain Research1988;30:203-14.
22. Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Woods RP, Phelps ME. Human functional anatomy of visually guidedfinger movements. Brain 1992;115:565-87.
23. Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry R. Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1995;7:497-510.
24. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB. et al. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline,No. 16. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service,Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662, 1995.
25. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Complex movement behavior: Toward understanding cortical andsubcortical interactions in regulating control processes. In: Hammond GE, editor. Cerebral Controlof Speech and Limb Movements. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, 1990. p.169-200.
26. Haaland KY, Harrington DL. Limb-sequencing deficits after left but not right hemispheric damage.Brain and Cognition 1994;24:104-22.
27. Haaland KY, Harrington D, Yeo R. The effects of task complexity in left and right CVA patients.Neuropsychologia 1987;25:783-94.
28. Halsband U, Freund, H-J. Motor learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1993;3:940-9.
29. Hanlon RE. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine andRehabilitation 1996;77:811-5.
30. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Langton Hewer R, Ward E. Arm function afterstroke: measurement and recovery after the first three months. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery,and Psychiatry 1987;50:714-9.
31. Hikosaka O, Rand MK, Miyachi S, Miyashita K. Learning of sequential movements in the monkey:Process of learning and retention of memory. J Neurophysiology 1995;74:1652-61.
32. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms ofvisuomotor transformation. Trends in Neuroscience 1995;18:314-20.
33. Jones RD, Donaldson IM, Parkin PJ. Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor functionfollowing unilateral cerebral infarction. Brain 1989;112:113-32.
34. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Theacquisition of skilled motor performance: Fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motorcortex. Proceedings National Acad. Sci, U.S.A. 1988;95:861-8.
35. Kausler DH, Wiley JG, Phillips PL. Adult age differences in memory for massed and distributedrepeated actions. Psychology and Aging 1990;5:530-4.
36. Lee TD, Magill RA. The locus of contextual interference in motor skill acquisition. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983;9:730-46.
37. Lee TD, White MA, Carnahan H. On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: Exploringthe guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior 1990;22:104-22.
38. Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien DJ. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 1994;46:328-44.
39. Lu X, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S. Localization of procedural memory function in monkey cerebellarnuclei. Society for Neuroscience 1997;23:500[Abstract].
40. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitativetraining on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791-4.
41. Okuda B, Tanaka H, Tomino Y, Kawabata K, Tachibana H, Sugita M. The role of the leftsomatosensory cortex in human hand movement. Experimental Brain Research 1995;106:493-8.
42. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke1990;21:247-51.
43. Pascal-Leone A, Dang N, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallett M. Modulation ofmuscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new finemotor skills. J. Neurophysiology 1995;74:1037-45.
44. Platz T, Denzler P, Kaden B, Mauritz K-H. Motor learning after recovery from hemiparesis.Neuropsychologia 1994;32:1209-23.
45. Pohl PS, Winstein CJ. Practice effects on the less affected upper extremity after stroke. Archives ofPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation. In press.
46. Pohl PS, Winstein CJ, Fisher BE. The locus of age-related movement slowing: Sensory processingin continuous goal-directed aiming. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science1996;51B:P94-P102.
47. Pohl PS, Winstein CJ, Onla-or S. Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity afterstroke. NeuroRehabilitation 1997;9:57-69. [Corringendum, NeuroRehabilitation 1997;9:245-9].
48. Poizner H, Clark MA, Merians AS, Macauley B. Joint coordination deficits in limb apraxia. Brain1995;118:227-42.
49. Roy EA, Kalbfleisch L, Elliott D. Kinematic analysis of manual asymmetries in visual aimingmovements. Brain and Cognition 1994;24:289-95.
50. Salmon DP, Butters N. Neurobiology of skill and habit learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology1995;5:184-90.
51. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review andcritical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin 1984;95:355-86.
52. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review1975;4:229-61.
53. Schmidt RA. Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretation. In:Requin J, Stelmach GE, editors. Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. The Netherlands: KluwerAcademic Publishers, 1991. p. 59-75.
54. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigmssuggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science 1992;3:207-17.
55. Schmidt RA, Shapiro DC. Optimizing feedback utilization in motor skill training (Report No. 186).Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute (Basic Research), 1986.
56. Schmidt RA, Young DE, Swinnen S, Shapiro DC. Summary knowledge of results for skillacquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory, and Cognition 1989;15:352-9.
57. Seitz RJ, Roland PE, Learning of sequential finger movements in man: a combined kinematic andpositron emission tomography (PET) study. European J. Neuroscience 1992;4:154-65.
58. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science1997;277:821-5.
59. Shea JB, Morgan RL. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, transfer of motorskill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979;5:179-87.
60. Smutok MA, Grafman J, Salazar AM, Sweeney JK, Jonas BS, DiRocco PJ. Effects of unilateralbrain damage on contralateral and ipsilateral upper extremity function in hemiplegia. PhysicalTherapy 1989;69:195-203.
61. Sparrow WA, Summers JJ. Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reducedrelative frequency presentations of KR. Journal of Motor Behavior 1992;24:197-209.
62. Sullivan K, Winstein CJ. Practice-related improvement during motor skill acquisition postunilateral-brain damage. Society for Neuroscience 1997;23:2374[Abstract].
63. Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley EL, Fletcher D, Langton Hewer R, Wade DT. Enhanced physicaltherapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1992;55:530-5.
64. Swanson LR, Lee TD. Effects of aging and schedules of knowledge of results (KR) in reducedrelative frequency presentations of KR. Journal of Gerontology 1992;47:P406-P411.
65. Tangeman PT, Banaitis DA, Williams AK. Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: changes infunctional performance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990;71:876-80.
66. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment afterstroke: Frequency, patterns, relationship to functional abilities. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery,and Psychiatry 1994;57:202-7.
67. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke:measurement and recovery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1983;46:521-4.
68. Wechsler DA. Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, 1987.
69. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RJS, Frackowiak RSJ. Functional reorganization of the brainin recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Annals of Neurology 1992;31:463-72.
70. Winstein CJ. Knowledge of results and motor learning: implications for physical therapy. PhysicalTherapy 1991;71:140-9.
71. Winstein CJ, Grafton ST, Pohl PS. Motor task difficulty and brain activity: An investigation ofgoal-directed reciprocal aiming using positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiology1997;77:1581-94.
72. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed handmovements. Experimental Brain Research 1995;105:163-74.
73. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R. Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results onmotor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport1994;45:316-23.
74. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skilllearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990;16:677-91.
75. Wulf G, Schmidt RA. The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequencyof knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,and Cognition 1989;15:748-57.
76. Ungerleider LG. Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory. Science1995;270:769-75.