Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp: A pilot study

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 957-967

  Tan, Caroline ^a,b   Tretriluxana, Jarugool ^a,c   Pitsch, Erica ^a,d   Runnarong, Nuttakarn ^a,c   Winstein, Carolee J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b St Rose Hospital   (United States)

^c MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

manual dexterity; motor learning; motor planning; posture selection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PLANNING; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; DECISION MAKING; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 84866295506     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968312437938     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 14-18
2. Wu C-Y, Chuang L-L, Lin K-C, Chen H-C, Tsay P-K. Randomized trial of distributed CIMT versus bilateral arm training for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor control and function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 ; 25: 130-139
3. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 ; 19: 27-32
4. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999 ; 30: 2369-2375
5. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke. 2000 ; 31: 2984-2988
6. Huang Y-H, Wu C-Y, Hsieh Y-W, Lin K-C. Predictors for change in quality of life after distributed constraint-induced therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 559-566
7. Roberts PS, Vegher JA, Gilewski M, Bender A, Riggs RV. Client-centered occupational therapy using constraint-induced therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005 ; 14: 115
8. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989 ; 104: 125-132
9. Ploughman M, Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically applied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 1417-1423
10. Pierce SR, Gallagher KG, Schaumburg SW, Gershkoff AM, Gaughan JP, Shutter L. Home forced use in an outpatient rehabilitation program for adults with hemiplegia: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 ; 17: 214-219
11. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 ; 17: 137-152
12. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 ; 3: 228-236
13. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006 ; 296: 2095-2104
14. Timmermans AA, Spooren AIF, Kingma H, Seelen HAM. Influence of task-oriented training content on skilled arm-hand performance in stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 858-870
15. Subramanian SK, Massie C, Malcolm MP, Levin MF. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 113-124
16. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 620-628
17. Shadmehr R, Wise S The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing: A Foundation for Motor Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 2005 :
18. Elsinger CL, Rosenbaum DA. End posture selection in manual positioning: evidence for feedforward modeling based on a movement choice method. Exp Brain Res. 2003 ; 152: 499-509
19. Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE. From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996 ; 94: 59-85
20. Alberts JL, Butler AJ, Wolf SL. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004 ; 18: 250-258
21. Caimmi M, Carda S, Giovanzana C, et al. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 31-39
22. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tang SF, Lin KC, Huang YY. Kinematic and clinical analyses of upper-extremity movements after constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88: 964-970
23. Lin KC, Wu CY, Wei TH, Lee CY, Liu JS. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2007 ; 21: 1075-1086
24. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tsai WC, Lin KC, Chou SH. A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 ; 88: 273-278
25. Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 ; 90: 571-579
26. Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen HC, Chen IH, Hong WH. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: a kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 460-466
27. Kwakkel G. Towards integrative neurorehabilitation science. Physiother Res Int. 2009 ; 14: 137-146
28. Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, Requejo P, Prilutsky BI, Dromerick AW. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009 ; 16: 237-253
29. Woodbury M, Velozo CA, Thompson PA, et al. Measurement structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: implications for motor control theory. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 791-801
30. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 ; 74: 347-354
31. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci. 1995 ; 130: 59-68
32. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 ; 80: 624-628
33. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999 ; 79: 847-853
34. Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 ; 17: 48-57
35. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 ; 16: 290-295
36. Park SW, Wolf SL, Blanton S, Winstein C, Nicholas-Larsen DS. The EXCITE trial: predicting a clinically meaningful motor activity log outcome. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 486-493
37. Winstein C, Wolf S Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation. Stein J Harvey RL Macko R Winstein C Zorowitz R, ed. New York, NY: Demos Medical ; 2008: 267-290.
38. Muir RB, Lemon RN. Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res. 1983 ; 261: 312-316
39. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975 ; 7: 13-31
40. Bensmail D, Robertson J, Fermanian C, Roby-Brami A. Botulinum toxin to treat upper-limb spasticity in hemiparetic patients: grasp strategies and kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 ; 24: 141-151
41. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ. Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004 ; 156: 458-470
42. Rosenbaum DA, Engelbrecht SE, Bushe MM, Loukopoulos LD. Knowledge model for selecting and producing reaching movements. J Mot Behav. 1993 ; 25: 217-227
43. Fisher BE, Winstein CJ, Velicki MR. Deficits in compensatory trajectory adjustments after unilateral sensorimotor stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 132: 328-344
44. Steenbergen B, Hulstijn W, Dortmans S. Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy: minimising discomfort. Exp Brain Res. 2000 ; 134: 385-397
45. Steenbergen B, Meulenbroek RG, Rosenbaum DA. Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy, and context. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 ; 19: 145-159
46. Short MW, Cauraugh JH. Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 ; 100: 243-252
47. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 ; 23: 313-319