Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 270-281

  James, G Andrew ^a   Lu, Zhong Lin ^b   VanMeter, John W ^c   Sathian, ^d,e   Hu, Xiaoping P ^a,f   Butler, Andrew J ^e,g  

^a Emory University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f Biomedical Imaging Technology Center   (United States)

^g EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective connectivity; FMRI; Hemiparesis; Motor cortex; Physical therapy; Resting state; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM WEAKNESS; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTONEURON; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARESIS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

AGED; ARM; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; PILOT PROJECTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REST; STROKE;

EID: 70349197799     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1604-270     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2007;115(5):e69-171.
2. Catalan MJ, Honda M, Weeks RA, Cohen LG, Hallett M. The functional neuroanatomy of simple and complex sequential fi nger movements: a PET study. Brain. 1998;121(Pt 2):25364.
3. Deiber MP, Passingham RE, Colebatch JG, Friston KJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RS. Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res. 1991;84(2):393-402.
4. Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Presty S, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, Phelps ME. Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood fl ow and PET. J Neurosci. 1992;12(7):2542-2548.
5. Jenkins IH, Brooks DJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE. Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography. J Neurosci. 1994;14(6):3775-3790.
6. Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Alkadhi H, et al. Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. Brain. 1997;120(Pt 1):141-157.
7. Toni I, Krams M, Turner R, Passingham RE. The time course of changes during motor sequence learning: a whole-brain fMRI study. NeuroImage. 1998;8(1):50-61.
8. He AG, Tan LH, Tang Y, et al. Modulation of neural connectivity during tongue movement and reading. Hum Brain Mapping. 2003;18(3):222-232.
9. Hansen LK, Larsen J, Nielsen FA, et al. Generalizable patterns in neuroimaging: how many principal components? NeuroImage. 1999;9(5):534-544.
10. Moeller JR, Strother SC. A regional covariance approach to the analysis of functional patterns in positron emission tomographic data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11(2):A121-135.
11. McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. NeuroImage. 1996;3 (3 Pt 1):143-157.
12. McKeown MJ, Jung TP, Makeig S, et al. Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the Stroop color-naming task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(3):803-810.
13. McKeown MJ, Makeig S, Brown GG, et al. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapping. 1998;6(3):160-188.
14. McIntosh AR, Gonzalez-Lima F. Structural modeling of functional neural pathways mapped with 2-deoxyglucose: effects of acoustic startle habituation on the auditory system. Brain Res. 1991;547(2):295-302.
15. Buchel C, Friston KJ. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7(8):768-778.
16. Buchel C, Coull JT, Friston KJ. The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science. 1999;283(5407):1538-1541.
17. James GA, Kelley ME, Craddock RC, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. NeuroImage. 2009;45: 778-787.
18. Zhuang J, LaConte S, Peltier S, Zhang K, Hu X. Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination. NeuroImage. 2005;25(2):462-470.
19. Craggs JG, Price DD, Verne GN, Perlstein WM, Robinson MM. Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive-affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia. NeuroImage. 2007;38(4): 720-729.
20. Glen DR, Chen G. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) or Path Analysis in AFNI. Available at: http:// afni.nimh.nih.gov/sscc/gangc/PathAna.html>. Accessed 2007.
21. Krakauer JW. Functional imaging of motor recovery after stroke: remaining challenges. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004;4(1):42-46.
22. Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2001: xiii, 390.
23. Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, Byun WM, Son S, Ahn SH. Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2003;14(10): 1329-1332.
24. Wittenberg GF, Bastian AJ, Dromerick AW, Thach WT, Powers WJ. Mirror movements complicate interpretation of cerebral activation changes during recovery from subcortical infarction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(3):213-221.
25. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(4):537-541.
26. Laufs H, Kleinschmidt A, Beyerle A, et al. EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1463-1476.
27. Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Del Gratta C, Romani GL, Corbetta M. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(32): 13170-13175.
28. Greicius MD, Srivastava G, Reiss AL, Menon V. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(13):4637-4642.
29. Vincent JL, Patel GH, Fox MD, et al. Intrinsic fun- ctionalarchitectureintheanaesthetizedmonkey brain. Nature. 2007;447(7140):83-86.
30. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008; 1124:1-38.
31. Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fl uctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(9):700-711.
32. Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, et al. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(37):13848- 13853.
33. Chen S, Ross TJ, Zhan W, et al. Group independent component analysis reveals consistent resting-state networks across multiple sessions. Brain Res. 2008;1239(6):141-151.
34. Waites AB, Stanislavsky A, Abbott DF, Jackson GD. Effect of prior cognitive state on resting state networks measured with functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapping. 2005;24(1):59-68.
35. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Epstein A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007;53(6):905-918.
36. Greicius MD, Flores BH, Menon V, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(5):429-437.
37. Bluhm RL, Miller J, Lanius RA, et al. Spontaneous low-frequency fl uctuations in the BOLD signal in schizophrenic patients: anomalies in the default network. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33(4): 1004-1012.
38. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2349-2356.
39. Hampson M, Driesen NR, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Constable RT. Brain connectivity related to working memory performance. J Neurosci. 2006;26(51):13338-13343.
40. Biswal BB, Van Kylen J, Hyde JS. Simultaneous assessment of fl ow and BOLD signals in resting-state functional connectivity maps. NMR Biomed. 1997;10(4-5):165-170.
41. Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(26):10046-10051.
42. Fransson P, Skiold B, Horsch S, et al. Resting-state networks in the infant brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(39):15531-15536.
43. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(27):9673-9678.
44. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(1):253-258.
45. Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, Dafotakis M, Fink GR. Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. NeuroImage. 2008;41(4):1382-1394.
46. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):620-628.
47. Kalra L, Potter J, Patel M, McCormack P, Swift CG. The role of standardised assessments in comparing stroke unit rehabilitation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;7:77-84.
48. Bates B, Choi JY, Duncan PW, et al. Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: executive summary. Stroke. 2005;36(9):2049-2056.
49. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-198.
50. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
51. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1635-1639.
52. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
53. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131-2140.
54. Lowe B, Unutzer J, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Kroenke K. Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the patient health questionnaire-9. Med Care. 2004;42(12):1194-1201.
55. Williams LS, Brizendine EJ, Plue L, et al. Performance of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depression after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36(3):635-658.
56. Winstein CJ. Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation. In: Duncan PW, Badke MB, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical; 1987:109-134
57. Hanlon RE. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(8): 811-815.
58. James GA, Kelley ME, Craddock RC, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. NeuroImag. 2009;45:778-787.
59. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14(11):1246-1255.
60. Peltier SJ, Noll DC. T(2)(*) dependence of low frequency functional connectivity. NeuroImage. 2002;16(4):985-992.
61. Johansen-Berg H. Functional imaging of stroke recovery: what have we learnt and where do we go from here? Int J Stroke. 2007;2(1):7-16.
62. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126 (Pt 11):2476-2496.