Use it and improve it or lose it: Interactions between arm function and use in humans post-stroke

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Hidaka, Yukikazu ^a   Han, Cheol E ^a,b   Wolf, Steven L ^c   Winstein, Carolee J ^d   Schweighofer, Nicolas ^d  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN REGRESSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPETITIVE MODELS; CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY; DYNAMICAL MODELING; FIRST ORDER; LONGITUDINAL DATA; NONLINEAR INTERACTIONS; STROKE RECOVERY; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTIONS;

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONLINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STROKE; ARM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BAYES THEOREM; EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84861138925     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002343     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS, (1994) Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 852-857.
2. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R, Durcan L, Carlton J, (2002) Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: 1035-1042.
3. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. (2006) Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Jama 296: 2095-2104.
4. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH, (1995) Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 130: 59-68.
5. Wolf S, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ, (2002) Repetitive Task Practice: A critical review of constraint induced therapy in stroke. The Neurologist 8: 325-338.
6. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC, (1999) Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral artery stroke: a randomized trial. Lancet 354: 191-196.
7. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW, (1996) Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791-1794.
8. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ, (1998) Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 80: 3321-3325.
9. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, et al. (2000) Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31: 1210-1216.
10. Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris DM, (2003) Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 14: S77-91, ix.
11. Conner JM, Culberson A, Packowski C, Chiba AA, Tuszynski MH, (2003) Lesions of the Basal forebrain cholinergic system impair task acquisition and abolish cortical plasticity associated with motor skill learning. Neuron 38: 819-829.
12. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T, (2002) New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 228-236.
13. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ, (2000) Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 74: 27-55.
14. Kleim JA, Jones TA, (2008) Principles of Experience-Dependent Neural Plasticity: Implications for Rehabilitation After Brain Damage. J Speech Lang Hear R 51: S225-S239.
15. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, et al. (2004) A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 620-628.
16. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, et al. (2008) Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 33-40.
17. Fujiwara T, Kasashima Y, Osada M, Muraoka Y, Ito M, et al. (2008) Motor improvement and corticospinal modulation induced by hybrid assistive neuromuscular dynamic stimulation (HANDS) therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 119: e82.
18. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM, (2006) The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys 42: 241-256.
19. Han CE, Arbib MA, Schweighofer N, (2008) Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000133.
20. Schweighofer N, Han CE, Wolf SL, Arbib MA, Winstein CJ, (2009) A Functional Threshold for Long-Term Use of Hand and Arm Function Can Be Determined: Predictions From a Computational Model and Supporting Data From the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial. Phys Ther 89: 1327-1336.
21. Wolf S, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB, (1989) Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 104: 104-132.
22. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, et al. (2005) The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19: 194-205.
23. Uswatte G, Taub E, (2005) Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraintinduced movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol 2005 50: 34-42.
24. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA, (2006) The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67: 1189-1194.
25. Hellstrom K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR, (2003) Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. J Rehabil Med 35: 202-207.
26. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Robichaud-Ekstrand S, Hanley JA, Richards CL, et al. (2006) Balance self-efficacy and its relevance to physical function and perceived health status after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 364-370.
27. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. (2003) Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17: 137-152.
28. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, et al. (2010) The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 41: 2309-2315.
29. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K, (2005) Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 36: 2493-2496.
30. Sutton RS, Barto AG, (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press xviii, 322.
31. Bishop CM, (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning Springer.
32. Kass RE, Raftery AE, (1995) Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90: 773-795.
33. Raftery AE, (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. In: Marsden PV, editors. Sociological methodology Cambridge, MA Blackwell pp. 111-196.
34. Stephan KE, Marshall JC, Penny WD, Friston KJ, Fink GR, (2007) Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization. J Neurosci 27: 3512-3522.
35. Doya K, (2002) Metalearning and neuromodulation. Neural Netw 15: 495-506.
36. Schweighofer N, Doya K, (2003) Meta-learning in reinforcement learning. Neural Netw 16: 5-9.
37. Daw ND, O'Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ, (2006) Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature 441: 876-879.
38. Krakauer JW, (2006) Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 19: 84-90.