Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners' ideas

Student Thinking and Learning in Science: Perspectives on the Nature and Development of Learners' Ideas

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-224

  Taber, Keith S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955698168     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203695081     Document Type: Book

References (215)

1. Murphy, P., Jones, H., & Lunn, S. (2004). The evaluation of RSC materials for schools and colleges: A report. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
2. Taber, K. S. (2002a). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: Classroom resources (Vol. 2). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
3. Taber, K. S. (2002b). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (Vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
4. Bell, B., Jones, A., & Car, M. (1995). The development of the recent National New Zealand Science Curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 26, 73-105.
5. Berube, C. T. (2008). The unfinished quest: The plight of progressive science education in the age of standards. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
6. Claxton, G. (1996). A SMER campaign: Combating creeping constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 27, 157-165. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560081
7. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel: Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved from www.ipn.uni-kiel. de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
8. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66 (4), 623-633.
9. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), 75-86.
10. Limerick, B., Burgess-Limerick, T., & Grace, M. (1996). The politics of interviewing: Power relations and accepting the gift. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9 (4), 449-460.
11. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College.
12. Reiss, M. J. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13-28). Rotterdam: Sense.
13. Taber, K. S. (2010a). Constructivism and direct instruction as competing instructional paradigms: An essay review of Tobias and Duffy's constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Education Review, 13 (8), 1-44. Retrieved from www.edrev.info/essays/v13n8 index.html
14. Taber, K. S. (2010b). Paying lip-service to research? The adoption of a constructivist perspective to inform science teaching in the English curriculum context. Curriculum Journal, 21 (1), 25-45.
15. Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory (pp. 39-61). New York, NY: Nova. Retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/ Constructivism.html.
16. Taber, K. S. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (Eds.). (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Rotterdam: Sense.
18. Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher, 35 (3), 125-129.
19. Dougherty, M. J. (2009). Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85 (1), 6-12.
20. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel: Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved from www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
21. Gardner, H. (1998). Extraordinary minds. London: Phoenix.
22. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Potochnik, A. (2013). Biological explanation. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (pp. 49-65). Dordrecht: Springer.
25. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world (R. M. Zaner & H. T. Engelhardt, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwest University Press.
26. Taber, K. S. (2013a). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of refiecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 151-177). Dordrecht: Springer.
27. Taber, K. S. (2013b). Representing evolution in science education: The challenge of teaching about natural selection. In B. Akpan (Ed.), Science education: A global perspective (pp. 65-91) . Abuja, Nigeria: Next Generation Education.
28. Whewell, W. (1833). Astronomy and general physics considered with reference to natural theology. London: William Pickering.
29. Abimbola, I. O. (1988). The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science. Science Education, 72 (2), 175-184.
30. Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93 (3), 389-421. doi: 10.1002/sce.20303
31. Black, P. J., & Lucas, A. M. (Eds.). (1993). Children's informal ideas in science. London: Routledge.
32. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966/1976). The 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon. In J. M. Gardiner (Ed.), Readings in human memory (pp. 243-255). London: Methuen.
33. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
34. Cheong, I. P.-A., Treagust, D., Kyeleve, I. J., & Oh, P.-Y. (2010). Evaluation of students' conceptual understanding of malaria. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (18), 2497-2519. doi: 10.1080/09500691003718014
35. Claxton, G. (1993). Minitheories: A preliminary model for learning science. In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas in science (pp. 45-61). London: Routledge.
36. diSessa, A. A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the 'pieces' vs. 'coherence' controversy (from the 'pieces' side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35-60). New York, NY: Routledge.
37. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
38. Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel: Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education. Retrieved from www.ipn. uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
39. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (Eds.). (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 9-27). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
41. Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2010). Concept development and transfer in context- based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (6), 817-837. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
42. Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10 (1), 61-98.
43. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (1), 53-90.
44. Helldén, G. (2005). Exploring understandings and responses to science: A program of longitudinal studies. Research in Science Education, 35 (1), 99-122. doi: 10.1007/s11165- 004-3435-0
45. Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D. A., & Rebello, N. S. (2010). Identifying students' mental models of sound propagation: The role of conceptual blending in understanding conceptual change. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6 (2), 020114.
46. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Keil, F. C. (2010). The feasibility of folk science. Cognitive Science, 34 (5), 826-862. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01108.x
48. Key Stage 3 National Strategy. (2002). Misconceptions in Key Stage 3 science. London: Department for Education and Skills.
49. Laudan, L. (1990). Science and relativism: Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Lelliott, A. (2013). Understanding gravity: The role of a school visit to a science centre. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1-18. doi: 10.1080/21548455.2013.818260
51. Lin, T.-J., Deng, F., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students' scientific epistemological beliefs, motivation in learning science, and their relationships: A comparative study within the Chinese culture. International Journal of Educational Development, 33 (1), 37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.007
52. Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth graders' learning about simple machines through engineering design-based instruction using LEGO™ materials. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1825-1850. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9335-9
53. McCain, K., & Weslake, B. (2013). Evolutionary theory and the epistemology of science. In K. Kampourakis (Ed.), The philosophy of biology: A companion for educators (pp. 101-119). Dordrecht: Springer.
54. National Academy of Sciences. (2013). Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the next generation science standards. In Next generation science standards: For states, by states (pp. 96-102). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
55. Petri, J., & Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (9), 1075-1088.
56. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy (corrected ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Pope, M. L., & Denicolo, P. (1986). Intuitive theories-a researcher's dilemma: Some practical methodological implications. British Educational Research Journal, 12 (2), 153-166.
58. Redish, E. F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In E. F. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Research on physics education (pp. 1-63). Bologna/Amsterdam: Italian Physical Society/IOS Press.
59. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (8), 909-921. doi: 10.1002/tea.20327
60. Sigelman, C. K. (2012). Age and ethnic differences in cold weather and contagion theories of colds and fiu. Health Education & Behavior, 39 (1), 67-76. doi: 10.1177/ 1090198111407187
61. Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5 (1), 49-59. doi: 10.1080/0140528830050105
62. Taber, K. S. (1995). Development of student understanding: A case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure. Research in Science & Technological Education, 13 (1), 87-97.
63. Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
64. Taber, K. S. (2010). Paying lip-service to research? The adoption of a constructivist perspective to inform science teaching in the English curriculum context. Curriculum Journal, 21 (1), 25-45.
65. Taber, K. S. (2013a). A common core to chemical conceptions: Learners' conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 391-418). Dordrecht: Springer.
66. Taber, K. S., & Bricheno, P. A. (2009). Coordinating procedural and conceptual knowledge to make sense of word equations: Understanding the complexity of a 'simple' completion task at the learner's resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (15), 2021-2055. doi: 10.1080/09500690802326243
67. Teichert, M. A., Tien, L. T., Anthony, S., & Rickey, D. (2008). Effects of context on students' molecular-level ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (8), 1095-1114. doi: 10.1080/09500690701355301
68. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
69. Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (4), 357-368. doi: 10.1080/09500690110066485
70. Witzig, S., Freyermuth, S., Siegel, M., Izci, K., & Pires, J. C. (2013). Is DNA alive? A study of conceptual change through targeted instruction. Research in Science Education, 43 (4), 1361-1375. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9311-4
71. Bickhard, M. H. (1998). Constructivism and relativism: A shoppers guide. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 99-112). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
72. Bodner, G. M., Klobuchar, M., & Geelan, D. (2001). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of Chemical Education, 78 , 1107.
73. Claxton, G. (2005). The wayward mind: An intimate history of the unconscious. London: Little Brown.
74. Haglund, J. (2013). Collaborative and self-generated analogies in science education. Studies in Science Education, 49 (1), 35-68. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2013.801119
75. Johnstone, A. H., & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemistry Education: Research & Practice in Europe, 2 (1), 19-29.
76. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
77. Osborne, J. F. (1996). Beyond constructivism. Science Education, 80 (1), 53-82. doi: 10.1002/ (sici)1098-237x(199601)80:1<53::aid-sce4>3.0.co;2-1
78. Solomon, J. (2000). The changing perspectives of constructivism: Science wars and children's creativity. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 283-307). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
79. Sweller, J. (2007). Evolutionary biology and educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology (pp. 165-175). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
80. Taber, K. S. (2006). Beyond constructivism: The progressive research programme into learning science. Studies in Science Education, 42, 125-184.
81. Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge.
82. Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Watts, M., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Enigmas in school science: Students' conceptions for scientifically associated words. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1 (2), 161-171.
84. Wellman, H. M. (2011). Developing a theory of mind. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley- Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 258-284). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
85. Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). Evolution. In P. Jarvis & M. Watts (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of learning (pp. 411-418). Abingdon: Routledge.
86. Adey, P. (1999). The science of thinking, and science for thinking: A description of Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE). Geneva: International Bureau of Education (UNESCO).
87. Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.
88. Andersson, B. (1990). Pupils' conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85. doi: 10.1080/03057269008559981
89. Bliss, J. (1995). Piaget and after: The case of learning science. Studies in Science Education, 25, 139-172.
90. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
91. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana.
92. Elman, J., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93. Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development: The learning brain. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
94. Hirschfeld, L., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6 (10), 766-774.
96. Keil, F. C. (1992). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28 (2), 16-46.
98. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83 (4), 435-450.
99. Oliver, M. (2011). Towards an understanding of neuroscience for science educators. Studies in Science Education, 47 (2), 211-235. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2011.604478
100. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
101. Piaget, J. (1970/1972). The principles of genetic epistemology ( W. Mays, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
102. Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research ( Vol. 39). Dordrecht: Springer.
103. Shayer, M., & Adey, P. (1981). Towards a science of science teaching: Cognitive development and curriculum demand. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.
104. Sternberg, R. J. (2009). WICS: A model of positive educational leadership comprising wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesised. In J. C. Kauffman & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The essential Sternberg: Essays on intelligence, psychology and education (pp. 377-431). New York, NY: Springer.
105. Sugarman, S. (1987). Piaget's construction of the child's reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Sutherland, P. (1992). Cognitive development today: Piaget and his critics. London: Paul Chapman.
107. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: Classroom resources ( Vol. 2). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
108. Taber, K. S. (Ed.). (2007). Science education for gifted learners. London: Routledge.
109. Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.
110. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2/3), 105-225.
111. Stavy, R., & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis)understand science and mathematics: Intuitive rules. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
112. Taber, K. S. (1997). Understanding chemical bonding: The development of A level students' understanding of the concept of chemical bonding (Doctoral thesis, Guildford, University of Surrey).
113. Taber, K. S., & García Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: Drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 (1), 99-142.
114. Watts, M., & Taber, K. S. (1996). An explanatory gestalt of essence: Students' conceptions of the 'natural' in physical phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (8), 939-954.
115. Beiser, A. (1973). Concepts of modern physics (2nd ed., international student ed.). Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
116. Brook, A., Briggs, H., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students' understanding of the particulate nature of matter. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
117. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
118. Emsley, J. (2010). A healthy, wealthy, sustainable world. Cambridge: RSC.
119. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
120. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (6), 611-628.
121. Gross, A. G. (1996). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
122. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Mulitmodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
124. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4 (2), 195-208.
125. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated cognition: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
126. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
127. Medawar, P. B. (1963/1990). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In P. B. Medawar (Ed.), The threat and the glory (pp. 228-233). New York, NY: Harper Collins. (Reprinted from Listener, 70, September 12, 1963, 377-378).
128. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30 (3), 359-377. doi: 10.1080/01411920410001689689
129. Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (7), 707-730.
130. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
131. Ruse, M. (1986/1993). Teleology and the biological sciences. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm: Essays on its history, philosophy and religious implications (pp. 146-154). London: Routledge.
132. Schmidt, H.-J. (1991). A label as a hidden persuader: Chemists' neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13 (4), 459-471.
133. Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy-in school and society. London: Falmer Press.
134. Taber, K. S. (2007). Choice for the gifted: Lessons from teaching about scientific explanations. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for gifted learners (pp. 158-171). London: Routledge.
135. Taber, K. S. (2012). Key concepts in chemistry. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Teaching secondary chemistry (2nd ed., pp. 1-47). London: Hodder Education.
136. Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners' explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1 (3), 329-353.
137. Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75 (1), 57-67. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750106
138. Toulmin, S. (1958/2003). The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
139. von Baeyer, H. C. (1993). Taming the atom: The emergence of the visible microworld. London: Viking.
140. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. London: MIT Press.
141. Wolpert, L. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. London: Faber & Faber.
142. Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education: Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82 (6), 679-697. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199811)82:6<679::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-e
143. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the sub-culture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27 (1), 1-52.
144. Allen, N. J., & Crawley, F. E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview confiicts of Kickapoo students of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35 (2), 111-132. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<111::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-V
145. Berry, R. J. (Ed.). (2009). Real scientists real faith. Oxford: Monarch Books.
146. George, J., & Glasgow, J. (1988). Street science and conventional science in the West Indies. Studies in Science Education, 15, 109-118. doi: 10.1080/03057268808559951
147. Inglis, J. T. (1993). Traditional ecological knowledge concepts and cases. Ottawa: International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge International Development Research Centre.
148. Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
149. Morris, H. M. (2000). The long war against God: The history and impact of the creation/evolution confiict. Green Forest, AR: Master Books.
150. Reiss, M. J. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44 (2), 157-186. doi: 10.1080/03057260802264214
151. Rosengren, K. S., Johnson, C. R., & Harris, P. L. (Eds.). (2000). Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Taber, K. S. (2013). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of refiecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N. Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science education for diversity: Theory and practice (pp. 151-177). Dordrecht: Springer.
153. Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students' responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95 (6), 1000-1025. doi: 10.1002/sce.20459
154. Topper, D. (1990). Newton on the number of colours in the spectrum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21 (2), 269-279. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(90)90026-5
155. Abrahams, I. (2011). Practical work in school science: A minds-on approach. London: Continuum.
156. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (14), 1945-1969. doi: 10.1080/09500690701749305
157. Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48 (1), 89-117. doi: 10.1080/ 03057267.2012.655038
158. Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
159. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The fiow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. C. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of fiow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, England: Open University Press.
161. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
162. Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2 (2), 115-130.
163. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (9), 799-822.
164. Keller, E. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
165. Koffka, K. (1967). Principles of gestalt psychology. In J. A. Dyal (Ed.), Readings in psychology: Understanding human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 9-13). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
166. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Preface. In The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. ix-xxiii). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
167. Necker, L. A. (1832). LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Philosophical Magazine Series 3, 1(5), 329-337.
168. Polanyi, M. (1962/1969). The unaccountable element in science. In M. Greene (Ed.), Knowing and being: Essays by Michael Polanyi (pp. 105-120). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
169. Taber, K. S. (1998). The sharing-out of nuclear attraction: Or 'I can't think about physics in chemistry'. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (8), 1001-1014.
170. Taber, K. S. (2010). Straw men and false dichotomies: Overcoming philosophical confusion in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 87 (5), 552-558. doi: 10.1021/ ed8001623
171. Alvarez, P., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 7041-7045.
172. Cheng, M. M. W. (2011). Students' visualization of scientific ideas: Case studies of a physical science and a biological science topic (Doctoral thesis, King's College, University of London, London).
173. Gauld, C. (1989). A study of pupils' responses to empirical evidence. In R. Millar (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education (pp. 62-82). London: Falmer Press.
174. Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exploring the contribution of integrated curriculum. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge.
175. Taber, K. S. (1994). Student reaction on being introduced to concept mapping. Physics Education, 29 (5), 276-281.
176. Taber, K. S. (1998). An alternative conceptual framework from chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 20 (5), 597-608.
177. Taber, K. S. (2000). Multiple frameworks? Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (4), 399-417.
178. Taber, K. S. (2003). Lost without trace or not brought to mind? A case study of remembering and forgetting of college science. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4 (3), 249-277.
179. Taber, K. S. (2006). Conceptual integration: A demarcation criterion for science education? Physics Education, 41 (4), 286-287.
180. Taber, K. S. (2013). A common core to chemical conceptions: Learners' conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 391-418). Dordrecht: Springer.
181. Vertes, R. P. (2004). Memory consolidation in sleep: Dream or reality. Neuron, 44 (1), 135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.034
182. Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron, 44 (1), 121-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031
183. Wiltgen, B. J., Brown, R. A. M., Talton, L. E., & Silva, A. J. (2004). New circuits for old memories: The role of the neocortex in consolidation. Neuron, 44 (1), 101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.015
184. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
185. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2 (2), 175-220.
186. Taber, K. S. (2000). Finding the optimum level of simplification: The case of teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35 (5), 320-325.
187. Taber, K. S. (2013a). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14 (2), 156-168. doi: 10.1039/C3RP00012E
188. Taber, K. S. (2013b). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
189. Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. London: Routledge.
190. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view . Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
191. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7-74.
192. Bruner, J. S. (1987). The transactional self. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (Eds.), Making sense: The child's construction of the world (pp. 81-96). London: Routledge.
193. Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students' preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (10), 1241-1257. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660301007
194. Cromer, A. (1997). Connected knowledge: Science, philosophy and education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
195. Frisch, O. R. (1979). What little I remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
196. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
197. Libarkin, J. C., Asghar, A., Crockett, C., & Sadler, P. (2011). Invisible misconceptions: Student understanding of ultraviolet and infrared radiation. Astronomy Education Review, 10 (1), 12.
198. Meitner, L., & Frisch, O. R. (1939). Disintegration of uranium by neutrons: A new type of nuclear reaction. Nature, (3615), 239-240.
199. Murphy, P., Jones, H., & Lunn, S. (2004). The evaluation of RSC materials for schools and colleges: A report. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
200. Naylor, S., & Keogh, B. (2000). Concept cartoons in science education. Sandbach, Cheshire: Millgate House.
201. Savinainen, A., & Scott, P. (2002). The force concept inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning. Physics Education, 37 (1), 45-52.
202. Taber, K. S. (2001). Constructing chemical concepts in the classroom? Using research to inform practice. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2 (1), 43-51.
203. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: Classroom resources (Vol. 2). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
204. Taber, K. S. (2011). The natures of scientific thinking: Creativity as the handmaiden to logic in the development of public and personal knowledge. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in the nature of science research: Concepts and methodologies (pp. 51-74). Dordrecht: Springer.
205. Taber, K. S. (2013). Upper secondary students' understanding of the basic physical interactions in analogous atomic and solar systems. Research in Science Education, 43 (4), 1377-1406. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9312-3
206. Tan, K.-C. D., Goh, N.-K., Chia, L.-S., & Taber, K. S. (2005). Development of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to determine A-level students' understanding of ionisation energy (pp. 105). Singapore: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. Retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/diagnostic_ instrument.html
207. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (2), 159-169. doi: 10.1080/0950069880100204
208. Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (special issue), 587-596.
209. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
210. Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47 (1), 3-36. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
211. Taber, K. S. (2002). Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: Theoretical background (Vol. 1). London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
212. Taber, K. S. (2003). Responding to alternative conceptions in the classroom. School Science Review, 84 (308), 99-108.
213. Taber, K. S. (2011). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory (pp. 39-61). New York, NY: Nova. Retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/Constructivism. html
214. Tobin, K., Kahle, J. B., & Fraser, B. J. (Eds.). (1990). Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Falmer Press.
215. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.