What should be the aim(s) of school science education?

The Re-Emergence of Values in Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 13-28

  Reiss, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136016027     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Ahmed, J., Gulam, W. A., & Hapeshi, D. (1998). Brickbats, survival and resistance. Multicultural Teaching, 16(3), 7-14.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bianchini, J. A., & Cavazos, L. M. (2001). Promoting inclusive science education through professional development: Challenges faced in transforming content and pedagogy. In A. Calabrese Barton & M. D. Osborne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice (pp. 259-293). New York: Peter Lang.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Braund, M., & Reiss, M, J. (Eds.). (2004). Learning science outside the classroom. London: Routledge Falmer.
6. Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
7. Calabrese Barton, A. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917.
8. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
9. Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: Major findings. London: Planet Science. Retrieved from http://www.planet-science.com/sciteach/review/Findings.pdf
10. Désautels, J., Fleury, S., & Garrison, J. (2002). The enactment of epistemological practice as subversive social action, the provocation of power, and anti-modernism. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 237-269). New York: Peter Lang.
11. Douglas, M. (1966/1970). Purity and danger, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
12. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13. Gewirtz, S. (1998). Conceptualizing social justice in education: Mapping the territory. Journal of Education Policy, 13, 469-484.
14. Gräber, W., & Bolte, C. (Eds.). (1997). Scientific literacy: An international symposium IPN 154. Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universitatät Kiel.
15. Hammond, L. (2001). Notes from California: An anthropological approach to urban science education for language minority families. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 983-999.
16. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2003). Message from the "Island Group": What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 607-615.
17. Harris, K. (1999). Aims! Whose aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The aims of education (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge.
18. Hart, C. (1998). Addressing participation and the quality of learning through curriculum change: Some lessons from the experience of VCE Physics. Australian Educational Researcher, 25(2), 19-37.
19. Haworth, L. (1986). Autonomy: An essay in philosophical psychology and ethics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Hildebrand, G. M. (2001, March). Con/testing learning models. Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St Louis.
21. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645-670.
22. Huckle, J. (1999). Locating environmental education between modern capitalism and postmodern socialism: A reply to Lucie Sauvé. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, 36-45.
23. Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703-710.
24. Jenkins, E. (2003). Guidelines for policy-making in secondary school science and technology education. Paris: UNESCO.
25. Jenkins, E. (2004). Science. In J. White (Ed.), Rethinking the school curriculum: Values, aims and purposes (pp. 165-178). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
26. Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientifc issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310.
27. Kress, G. (2000). A curriculum for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 133-145.
28. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2002). Learning science in the community. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science Education as/for Sociopolitical Action (pp. 37-66). New York: Peter Lang.
29. Longbottom, J. E., & Butler, P. H. (1999). Why teach science? Setting rational goals for science education. Science Education, 83, 473-492.
30. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.
31. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
32. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Nuffield Foundation.
33. Miller, J. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
34. Ogborn, J. (2002). Ownership and transformation: Teachers using curriculum innovation. Physics Education, 37, 142-146.
35. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils' & parents' views of the school science curriculum: A study funded by the Wellcome Trust. London: King's College London.
36. Oulton, C, Dillon, J., & Grace, M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 411-423.
37. Perder F., & Nsengiyumva, J.-B. (2003). Active science as a contribution to the trauma recovery process: Preliminary indications with orphans from the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1111-1128.
38. Reiss, M. J. (2000). Understanding science lessons: Five years of science teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
39. Reiss, M. J. (2003). Science education for social justice. In C. Vincent (Ed.), Social justice, education and identity (pp. 153-165). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
40. Reiss, M. J. (2005). The importance of affect in science education. In S. Alsop (Ed.), The affective dimensions of cognition: Studies from education in the sciences (pp. 17-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
41. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). What is (should be) the researcher's role in terms of agency? A question for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 963-965.
42. Roth, W.-M., & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science Education as/for Sociopolitical Action. New York: Peter Lang.
43. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 33-56.
44. Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking Scientific Literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
45. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
46. Shamos, M. H. (1995). The Myth of Scientific Literacy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
47. Symington, D., & Tytler, R. (2004). Community leaders' views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1403-1418.
48. Standish, P. (1999). Education without aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 35-49). London: Routledge.
49. Thomas, J. (2000). Using current controversies in the classroom: Opportunities and concerns. Melbourne Studies in Education, 41(2), 133-144.
50. Tobin, K. (2002). Beyond the bold rhetoric of reform: (Re)learning to teach science appropriately. In W.-M. Roth & J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 125-150). New York: Peter Lang.
51. Walker, J. C. (1999). Self-determination as an educational aim. In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 112-123). London: Routledge.
52. Wallace, J., Louden, W., Blahey, A., Campbell, A., Fensham, P. J., & Erickson, G. L. (2002). Science for all. In J. Wallace & W. Louden (Eds.), Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice (pp. 205-216). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
53. White, J. (1999). In defence of liberal aims in education. In R. Marples (Ed.), The Aims of Education (pp. 185-200). London: Routledge.