Plant α-glucan phosphatases SEX4 and LSF2 display different affinity for amylopectin and amylose

FEBS Letters

Volumn 590, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 118-128

  Wilkens, Casper ^a   Auger, Kyle D ^b   Anderson, Nolan T ^c   Meekins, David A ^b   Raththagala, Madushi ^b   Abou Hachem, Maher ^a   Payne, Christina M ^c   Gentry, Matthew S ^b   Svensson, Birte ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

affinity gel electrophoresis; carbohydrate binding domain; Like Sex Four2; Starch Excess 4; surface binding sites; surface plasmon resonance

Indexed keywords

ALPHA GLUCAN PHOSPHATASE; AMYLOPECTIN; AMYLOSE; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; LIKE SEX FOUR2 PROTEIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; PHOSPHATASE; STARCH EXCESS 4 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN DERIVATIVE; DUAL SPECIFICITY PHOSPHATASE; LSF2 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SEX4 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME BINDING; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CARBOHYDRATE INTERACTION; SIMULATION; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARABIDOPSIS; CELL GRANULE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; KINETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PLANT LEAF; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMYLOPECTIN; AMYLOSE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; BETA-CYCLODEXTRINS; BINDING SITES; CARBOHYDRATE CONFORMATION; CYTOPLASMIC GRANULES; DUAL-SPECIFICITY PHOSPHATASES; KINETICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MUTATION; PLANT LEAVES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE;

EID: 84955557966     PISSN: 00145793     EISSN: 18733468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.12027     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Pérez S, and, Bertoft E, (2010) The molecular structures of starch components and their contribution to the architecture of starch granules: a comprehensive review. Starch - Stärke 62, 389-420.
2. Streb S, and, Zeeman SC, (2012) Starch metabolism in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book 10, e0160.
3. Zuicuri H, (1981) Multi-branched nature of amylose and the action of debranching enzymes. Carbohydr Res 94, 205-213.
4. Ritte G, Lloyd JR, Eckermann N, Rottmann A, Kossmann J, and, Steup M, (2002) The starch-related R1 protein is an α-glucan. water dikinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 7166-7171.
5. Kötting O, Pusch K, Tiessen A, Geigenberger P, Steup M, and, Ritte G, (2005) Identification of a novel enzyme required for starch metabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. The phosphoglucan, water dikinase. Plant Physiol 137, 242-252.
6. Blennow A, Nielsen TH, Baunsgaard L, Mikkelsen R, and, Engelsen SB, (2002) Starch phosphorylation: a new front line in starch research. Trends Plant Sci 7, 445-450.
7. Yu TS, Kofler H, Häusler RE, Hille D, Flügge UI, Zeeman SC, Smith AM, Kossmann J, Lloyd J, Ritte G, et al. (2001) The Arabidopsis sex1 mutant is defective in the R1 protein, a general regulator of starch degradation in plants, and not in the chloroplast hexose transporter. Plant Cell 13, 1907-1918.
8. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Wischmann B, Olsen CE, and, Møller BL, (1998) The degree of starch phosphorylation is related to the chain length distribution of the neutral and the phosphorylated chains of amylopectin. Carbohydr Res 307, 45-54.
9. Blennow A, and, Engelsen SB, (2010) Helix-breaking news: fighting crystalline starch energy deposits in the cell. Trends Plant Sci 15, 236-240.
10. Damager I, Engelsen SB, Blennow A, Møller BL, and, Motawia MS, (2010) First principles insight into the α-glucan structures of starch: their synthesis, conformation, and hydration. Chem Rev 110, 2049-2080.
11. Meekins DA, Raththagala M, Husodo S, White CJ, Guo H-F, Kötting O, Vander Kooi CW, and, Gentry MS, (2014) Phosphoglucan-bound structure of starch phosphatase starch excess4 reveals the mechanism for C6 specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 7272-7277.
12. Santelia D, Kötting O, Seung D, Schubert M, Thalmann M, Bischof S, Meekins DA, Lutz A, Patron N, Gentry MS, et al. (2011) The phosphoglucan phosphatase like sex four2 dephosphorylates starch at the C3-position in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 4096-4111.
13. Hejazi M, Fettke J, Kötting O, Zeeman SC, and, Steup M, (2010) The laforin-like dual-specificity phosphatase SEX4 from Arabidopsis hydrolyzes both C6- and C3-phosphate esters introduced by starch-related dikinases and thereby affects phase transition of α-glucans. Plant Physiol 152, 711-722.
14. Meekins DA, Guo H-F, Husodo S, Paasch BC, Bridges TM, Santelia D, Kötting O, Vander Kooi CW, and, Gentry MS, (2013) Structure of the Arabidopsis glucan phosphatase like sex four2 reveals a unique mechanism for starch dephosphorylation. Plant Cell 25, 2302-3214.
15. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, and, Henrissat B, (2014) The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D490-D495.
16. Cockburn D, and, Svensson B, (2013) Surface binding sites in carbohydrate active enzymes: an emerging picture of structural and functional diversity. In Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. 39 (Rauter P and Lindhorst T, eds), pp. 204-221. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambrigde.
17. Cuyvers S, Dornez E, Delcour JA, and, Courtin CM, (2011) Occurrence and functional significance of secondary carbohydrate binding sites in glycoside hydrolases. Crit Rev Biotechnol 31, 93-107.
18. Cockburn D, Wilkens C, Ruzanski C, Andersen S, Willum Nielsen J, Smith AM, Field RA, Willemoës M, Abou Hachem M, and, Svensson B, (2014) Analysis of surface binding sites (SBSs) in carbohydrate active enzymes with focus on glycoside hydrolase families 13 and 77 - a mini-review. Biologia (Bratisl) 69, 705-712.
19. Bozonnet S, Jensen MT, Nielsen MM, Aghajari N, Jensen MH, Kramhøft B, Willemoës M, Tranier S, Haser R, and, Svensson B, (2007) The "pair of sugar tongs" site on the non-catalytic domain C of barley α-amylase participates in substrate binding and activity. FEBS J 274, 5055-5067.
20. Nielsen MM, Bozonnet S, Seo E-S, Mótyán JA, Andersen JM, Dilokpimol A, Abou Hachem M, Gyémánt G, Naested H, Kandra L, et al. (2009) Two secondary carbohydrate binding sites on the surface of barley α-amylase 1 have distinct functions and display synergy in hydrolysis of starch granules. Biochemistry 48, 7686-7697.
21. Sevcík J, Hostinová E, Solovicová A, Gasperík J, Dauter Z, and, Wilson KS, (2006) Structure of the complex of a yeast glucoamylase with acarbose reveals the presence of a raw starch binding site on the catalytic domain. FEBS J 273, 2161-2171.
22. Sim L, Beeren SR, Findinier J, Dauvillée D, Ball S, Henriksen A, and, Palcic MM, (2014) Crystal structure of the Chlamydomonas starch debranching enzyme isoamylase ISA1 reveals insights into the mechanism of branch trimming and complex assembly. J Biol Chem 289, 22991-23003.
23. Wilkens C, Cuesta-Seijo JA, Palcic M, and, Svensson B, (2014) Selectivity of the surface binding site (SBS) on barley starch synthase I. Biologia (Bratisl) 69, 1118-1121.
24. Cuesta-Seijo JA, Nielsen MM, Marri L, Tanaka H, Beeren SR, and, Palcic MM, (2013) Structure of starch synthase I from barley: insight into regulatory mechanisms of starch synthase activity. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69, 1013-1025.
25. Kötting O, Santelia D, Edner C, Eicke S, Marthaler T, Gentry MS, Comparot-Moss S, Chen J, Smith AM, Steup M, et al. (2009) Starch-excess4 is a laforin-like phosphoglucan phosphatase required for starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21, 334-346.
26. Vander KC, Taylor AO, Pace RM, Meekins DA, Guo H-F, Kim Y, and, Gentry MS, (2010) Structural basis for the glucan phosphatase activity of starch excess4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 15379-15384.
27. Takeo K, and, Nakamura S, (1972) Dissociation constants of glucan phosphorylases gel of rabbit tissue studied by polyacrylamide gel disc electrophoresis. Arch Biochem Biophys 153, 1-7.
28. Anandakrishnan R, Aguilar B, and, Onufriev AV, (2012) H++ 3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations. Nucleic Acids Res 40, 537-541.
29. Gordon JC, Myers JB, Folta T, Shoja V, Heath LS, and, Onufriev A, (2005) H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 368-371.
30. Web server Version 3.2. http://biophysics.cs.vt.edu/H++. (last accessed 15 December 2015)
31. Myers JB, Grothause G, Narayanan S, and, Onufriev A, (2006) Crystal structure and putative function of small toprim domain-containing protein from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Proteins 63, 928-938.
32. Brooks BR III, Brooks CL, Mackerell AD Jr, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, et al. (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30, 1545-1614.
33. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kalé L, and, Schulten K, (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26, 1781-1802.
34. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellot M Jr, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, et al. (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102, 3586-3616.
35. Mackerell AD, Feig M, and, Brooks CL, (2004) Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Chem 25, 1400-1415.
36. Guvench O, Greene SN, Kamath G, Brady JW, Venable RM, Pastor RW, and, Mackerell AD Jr, (2008) Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose. J Comput Chem 29, 2543-2564.
37. Guvench O, Hatcher ER, Venable RM, Pastor RW, and, Mackerell AD Jr, (2009) CHARMM additive all-atom force field for glycosidic linkages between hexopyranoses. J Chem Theory Comput 5, 2353-2370.
38. Durell SR, Brooks BR, and, Ben-Naim A, (1994) Solvent-induced forces between two hydrophilic groups. J Phys Chem 98, 2198-2202.
39. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, and, Klein ML, (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79, 926.
40. Case DA, Berryman JT, Metz RM, Cerutti TE, Cheatman TE III, Darden TA, Duke RE, Giese TJ, Gohlke H, Goetz AW, et al. (2015) AMBER 2015. University of California, San Fransisco.
41. Blennow A, and, Svensson B, (2010) Dynamics of starch granule biogenesis-the role of redox-regulated enzymes and low-affinity carbohydrate-binding modules. Biocatal Biotransform 28, 3-9.
42. Mikkelsen R, Suszkiewicz K, and, Blennow A, (2006) A novel type carbohydrate-binding module identified in α-glucan, water dikinases is specific for regulated plastidial starch metabolism. Biochemistry 45, 4674-4682.
43. Christiansen C, Abou Hachem M, Glaring MA, Viksø-Nielsen A, Sigurskjold BW, Svensson B, and, Blennow A, (2009) A CBM20 low-affinity starch-binding domain from glucan, water dikinase. FEBS Lett 583, 1159-1163.
44. Glaring MA, Baumann MJ, Abou Hachem M, Nakai H, Nakai N, Santelia D, Sigurskjold BW, Zeeman SC, Blennow A, and, Svensson B, (2011) Starch-binding domains in the CBM45 family low-affinity domains from glucan, water dikinase and α-amylase involved in plastidial starch metabolism. FEBS J 278, 1175-1185.
45. Giardina T, Gunning AP, Juge N, Faulds CB, Furniss CS, Svensson B, Morris VJ, and, Williamson G, (2001) Both binding sites of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase are essential for inducing a conformational change in amylose. J Mol Biol 313, 1149-1159.
46. Christiansen C, Abou Hachem M, Janecek S, Viksø-Nielsen A, Blennow A, and, Svensson B, (2009) The carbohydrate-binding module family 20-diversity, structure, and function. FEBS J 276, 5006-5029.
47. Chou W-Y, Chou W-I, Pai T-W, Lin S-C, Jiang T-Y, Tang C-Y, and, Chang MD-T, (2010) Feature-incorporated alignment based ligand-binding residue prediction for carbohydrate-binding modules. Bioinformatics 26, 1022-1028.
48. Mikami B, Adachi M, Kage T, Sarikaya E, Nanmori T, Shinke R, and, Utsumi S, (1999) Structure of raw starch-digesting Bacillus cereus β-amylase complexed with maltose. Biochemistry 38, 7050-7061.
49. Ye Z, Miyake H, Tatsumi M, Nishimura S, and, Nitta Y, (2004) Two additional carbohydrate-binding sites of β-amylase from Bacillus cereus var. mycoides are involved in hydrolysis and raw starch-binding. J Biochem 135, 355-363.
50. Miyake H, Kurisu G, Kusunoki M, Nishimura S, Kitamura S, and, Nitta Y, (2003) Crystal structure of a catalytic site mutant of β-amylase from Bacillus cereus var. mycoides cocrystallized with maltopentaose. Biochemistry 42, 5574-5581.
51. Lawson CL, van Montfort R, Strokopytov B, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, de Vries GE, Penninga D, Dijkhuizen L, and, Dijkstra BW, (1994) Nucleotide sequence and X-ray structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Bacillus circulans strain 251 in a maltose-dependent crystal form. J Mol Biol 236, 590-600.
52. Strokopytov B, Knegtel RM, Penninga D, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkhuizen L, and, Dijkstra BW, (1996) Structure of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase complexed with a maltononaose inhibitor at 2.6 Å resolution. Implications for product specificity. Biochemistry 35, 4241-4249.