Feature-incorporated alignment based ligand-binding residue prediction for carbohydrate-binding modules

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1022-1028

  Chou, Wei Yao ^a   Chou, Wei I ^a,b   Pai, Tun Wen ^c   Lin, Shu Chuan ^a   Jiang, Ting Ying ^a   Tang, Chuan Yi ^a   Chang, Margaret Dah Tsyr ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Simpson Biotech Co Ltd   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

CARBOHYDRATE; LIGAND;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ARABIDOPSIS; BINDING SITES; CARBOHYDRATES; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77951951973     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq084     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abbate,E.A. et al. (2006) Structure of the papillomavirus DNA-tethering complex E2:Brd4 and a peptide that ablates HPV chromosomal association. Mol. Cell, 24, 877-889.
2. Abe,A. et al. (2004) Complex structures of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris R-47 alphaamylase 1 with malto-oligosaccharides demonstrate the role of domain N acting as a starch-binding domain. J. Mol. Biol., 335, 811-822.
3. Bahr,A. et al. (2001) BAliBASE (BenchmarkAlignment dataBASE): enhancements for repeats, transmembrane sequences and circular permutations. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 323-326.
4. Benson,D.A. et al. (2009) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D26-D31.
5. Berman,H. et al. (2007) The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D301-D303.
6. Boraston,A.B. et al. (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J., 382, 769-781.
7. Boutet,E. et al. (2007) UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. Methods Mol. Biol., 406, 89-112.
8. Capra,J.A. and Singh,M. (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics, 23, 1875-1882.
9. Chen,X.W. and Jeong,J.C. (2009) Sequence-based prediction of protein interaction sites with an integrative method. Bioinformatics, 25, 585-591.
10. Chou,W.Y. et al. (2006) Multiple indexing sequence alignment for group feature identification. The 3rd Annual RECOMB Satellite Workshop on Regulatory Genomics, 77-89.
11. Chou,W.-Y. et al. (2009) Biological feature incorporated alignment for cross species analysis on carbohydrate binding modules. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics & Biomedicine Washington, DC.
12. Christiansen,C. et al. (2009) The carbohydrate-binding module family 20-diversity, structure, and function. FEBS J., 276, 5006-5029.
13. Do,C.B. et al. (2005) ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res., 15, 330-340.
14. Edgar,R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 113.
15. Feese,M.D. et al. (2000) Crystal structure of glycosyltrehalose trehalohydrolase from the hyperthermophilic archaeum Sulfolobus solfataricus. J. Mol. Biol., 301, 451-464.
16. Fischer,J.D. et al. (2008) Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation. Bioinformatics, 24, 613-620.
17. Gotoh,O. (1982) An improved algorithm for matching biological sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 162, 705-708.
18. Guzman-Maldonado,H. and Paredes-Lopez,O. (1995) Amylolytic enzymes and products derived from starch: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 35, 373-403.
19. Hashimoto,H. (2006) Recent structural studies of carbohydrate-binding modules. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 63, 2954-2967.
20. Henikoff,S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
21. Kamitori,S. et al. (1999) Crystal structure of Thermoactinomyces vulgaris R-47 alphaamylase II (TVAII) hydrolyzing cyclodextrins and pullulan at 2.6 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol., 287, 907-921.
22. Katoh,K. et al. (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res., 30, 3059-3066.
23. King,R.D. and Sternberg,M.J. (1996) Identification and application of the concepts important for accurate and reliable protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci., 5, 2298-2310.
24. Larkin,M.A. et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948.
25. Liu,Y.N. et al. (2007) Solution structure of family 21 carbohydrate-binding module from Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase. Biochem J., 403, 21-30.
26. Mikkelsen,R. et al. (2006) A novel type carbohydrate-binding module identified in alpha-glucan, water dikinases is specific for regulated plastidial starch metabolism. Biochemistry, 45, 4674-4682.
27. Milton,F. (1937) The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 32, 675-701.
28. Needleman,S.B. and Wunsch,C.D. (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 48, 443-453.
29. Notredame,C. et al. (2000) T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol., 302, 205-217.
30. Orengo,C.A. et al. (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5, 1093-1108.
31. Pell,G. et al. (2003) Importance of hydrophobic and polar residues in ligand binding in the family 15 carbohydrate-binding module from Cellvibrio japonicus Xyn10C. Biochemistry, 42, 9316-9323.
32. Ponyi,T. et al. (2000) Trp22, Trp24, and Tyr8 play a pivotal role in the binding of the family 10 cellulose-binding module from Pseudomonas xylanase A to insoluble ligands. Biochemistry, 39, 985-991.
33. Schmidt,L.D. and Dauenhauer,P.J. (2007) Chemical engineering: hybrid routes to biofuels. Nature, 447, 914-915.
34. Sorimachi,K. et al. (1997) Solution structure of the granular starch binding domain of Aspergillus niger glucoamylase bound to beta-cyclodextrin. Structure, 5, 647-661.
35. Southall,S.M. et al. (1999) The starch-binding domain from glucoamylase disrupts the structure of starch. FEBS Lett., 447, 58-60.
36. Subramanian,A.R. et al. (2008) DIALIGN-TX: greedy and progressive approaches for segment-based multiple sequence alignment. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 3,6.
37. Tang,C.Y. et al. (2003) Constrained multiple sequence alignment tool development and its application to RNase family alignment. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 1, 267-287.
38. Thomsen,R. and Christensen,M.H. (2006) MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking. J. Med. Chem., 49, 3315-3321.
39. Tormo,J. et al. (1996) Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose. EMBO J., 15, 5739-5751.
40. Tung,J.Y. et al. (2008) Crystal structures of the starch-binding domain from Rhizopus oryzae glucoamylase reveal a polysaccharide-binding path. Biochem. J., 416, 27-36.
41. Valdez,H.A. et al. (2008) Role of the N-terminal starch-binding domains in the kinetic properties of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochemistry, 47, 3026-3032.
42. van Montfort,R.L. et al. (2001) Crystal structure and assembly of a eukaryotic small heat shock protein. Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 1025-1030.
43. Wayllace,N.Z.et al. (2010)The starch-binding capacity of the noncatalytic SBD2 region and the interaction between the Nand C-terminal domains are involved in the modulation of the activity of starch synthase III from Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS J., 277, 428-440.
44. Xie,H. et al. (2001)Role of hydrogen bonding in the interaction between a xylan binding module and xylan. Biochemistry, 40, 5700-5707.
45. Yang,A.S. and Honig,B. (1999) Sequence to structure alignment in comparative modeling using PrISM. Proteins, (Suppl. 3), 66-72.
46. Yang,J.M. and Chen,C.C. (2004) GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking. Proteins, 55, 288-304.