Changes in sensory characteristics and their relation with consumers' liking, wanting and sensory satisfaction: Using dietary fibre and lime flavour in Stevia rebaudiana sweetened fruit beverages

Food Research International

Volumn 82, Issue , 2016, Pages 14-21

  Mielby, Line H ^a   Andersen, Barbara V ^a,b   Jensen, Sidsel ^a   Kildegaard, Heidi ^a   Kuznetsova, Alexandra ^b   Eggers, Nina ^a   Brockhoff, Per B ^b   Byrne, Derek V ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Consumer response; Cross modality; Flavour; Fruit beverages; Stevia rebaudiana; Glucan

Indexed keywords

FIBERS; FLAVORS; FRUITS; HEALTH; LIME; ODORS; POLYSACCHARIDES; SENSORY ANALYSIS; SUGAR INDUSTRY; SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

CONSUMER RESPONSE; CROSS MODALITY; FIBRE CONCENTRATIONS; FRUIT BEVERAGES; HEALTH PERSPECTIVE; SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS; SENSORY DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS; STEVIA REBAUDIANA;

BEVERAGES;

EID: 84955304259     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen B.V. Sensory factors in food satisfaction. An understanding of the satisfaction term and a measurement of factors involved in sensory- and food satisfaction 2015, DTU University Press, Kgs.Lyngby, PhD. thesis.
2. Andersen B.V., Hyldig G. Consumers' view on determinants to food satisfaction. A qualitative approach. Appetite 2015, 9(2015):9-16.
3. Andersen B.V., Hyldig G. Food satisfaction: Integrating feelings before, during and after food intake. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 45(2015):126-134.
4. Anton S.D., Martin C.K., Han H., Coulon S., Cefalu W.T., Geiselman P., Williamson D.A. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 2010, 55(1):37-43.
5. Arvola A., Lähteenmäki L., Tuorila H. Predicting the intent to purchase unfamiliar and familiar cheeses: The effects of attitudes, expected liking and food neophobia. Appetite 1999, 32:113-126.
6. ASTM, Committee E-18 Physical requirement guidelines for sensory evaluation laboratories. American Society for Testing and Materials 1986, ASTM Special Technical Publication 913, Philadelphia, PA. J. Eggerti, K. Zook (Eds.).
7. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. _lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4_. R package version 1.1-8
8. Bokkelen R.v. Reduced-calorie beverages with stevia 2012, 17-18. FST South African Food Science and Technology.
9. Cadena R.S., Cruz A.G., Netto R.R., Castro W.F., Faria J.d.A.F., Bolini H.M.A. Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Research International 2013, 54(2):1670-1679.
10. Carbonell-Capella J.M., Barba F.J., Esteve M.J., Frígola A. High pressure processing of fruit juice mixture sweetened with Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Optimal retention of physical and nutritional quality. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2013, 18:48-56.
11. Cardello A.V., Schutz H.G., Snow C., Lesher L. Predictors of food acceptance, consumption and satisfaction in specific eating situations. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:201-216.
12. Cardoso J.M.P., Bolini H.M.A. Different sweeteners in peach nectar: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. Food Research International 2007, 40(10):1249-1253.
13. Core Team R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
14. De Melo L.L.M.M., Bolini H.M.A., Efraim P. Sensory profile, acceptability, and their relationship for diabetic/reduced calorie chocolates. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20(2):138-143.
15. Deliza R., Macfie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11:103-128.
16. Delwiche J. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavor. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(2):137-146.
17. Endrizzi I., Menichelli E., Johansen S.B., Olsen N.V., Næs T. Handling of individual differences in rating-based conjoint analysis. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(3):241-254.
18. Finlayson G., King N., Blundell J.E. Is it possible to dissociate "liking" and "wanting" for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure. Physiology & Behavior 2007, 90(1):36-42.
19. Grunert K.G. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2002, 13(8):275-285.
20. Guggisberg D., Piccinali P., Schreier K. Effects of sugar substitution with stevia, Actilight™ and stevia combinations or Palatinose™ on rheological and sensory characteristics of low-fat and whole milk set yoghurt. International Dairy Journal 2011, 21(9):636-644.
21. Izydorczyk M.S., Dexter J.E. Barley β-glucans and arabinoxylans: Molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and uses in food products-A review. Food Research International 2008, 41(9):850-868.
22. Jones P.R., Gawel R., Francis I.L., Waters E.J. The influence of interactions between major white wine components on the aroma, flavour and texture of model white wine. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(6):596-607.
23. Kildegaard H., Tønning E., Thybo A.K. Preference, liking and wanting for beverages in children aged 9-14years: Role of sourness perception, chemical composition and background variables. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22(7):620-627.
24. Kuznetsova A., Brockhoff P.B., Christensen R.H.B. lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R Package Version 2015, 2:0-29. (http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest).
25. Kuznetsova A., Christensen R.H.B., Bavay C., Brockhoff P.B. Automated mixed ANOVA modelling of sensory and consumer data. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 40(Part A):31-38.
26. Lyly M., Roininen K., Honkapää K., Poutanen K., Lähteenmäki L. Factors influencing consumers' willingness to use beverages and ready-to-eat frozen soups containing oat β-glucan in Finland, France and Sweden. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:242-255.
27. Lyly M., Salmenkallio-Marttila M., Suortti T., Autio K., Poutanen K., Lähteenmäki L. The sensory characteristics and rheological properties of soups containing oat and barley β-glucan before and after freezing. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2004, 37:749-761.
28. Macfie H.J., Bratchell N. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. Journal of Sensory Studies 1989, 4:129-148.
29. Mela D.J. Eating for pleasure or just wanting to eat? Reconsidering sensory hedonic responses as a driver of obesity. Appetite 2006, 47(1):10-17.
30. Mielby L.H., Kildegaard H., Gabrielsen G., Edelenbos M., Thybo A.K. Adolescent and adult visual preferences for pictures of fruit and vegetable mixes - Effect of complexity. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 26(2):188-195.
31. Moskowitz H.R., Krieger B. What sensory characteristics drive product quality? An assesment of individual differences. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 8(1993):271-282.
32. Moskowitz H.R., Krieger B. The contribution of sensory liking to overall liking: An analysis of six food categories. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6(2):83-90.
33. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M., Baxter I.A. Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Research International 2001, 34(6):461-471.
34. Paquet É., Bédard A., Lemieux S., Turgeon S.L. Effects of apple juice-based beverages enriched with dietary fibres and xanthan gum on the glycemic response and appetite sensations in healthy men. Bioactive Carbohydrates and Dietary Fibre 2014, 4:39-47.
35. Philippe R.N., De Mey M., Anderson J., Ajikumar P.K. Biotechnological production of natural zero-calorie sweeteners. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2014, 26:155-161.
36. Porto Cardoso J.M., André Bolini H.M. Descriptive profile of peach nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 2008, 23(6):804-816.
37. Prakash I., Dubois G.E., Clos J.F., Wilkens K.L., Fosdick L.E. Development of rebiana, a natural, non-caloric sweetener. Food and Chemical Toxicology: An International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association 2008, 46(Suppl. 7 (7)):S75-S82.
38. Shankar P., Ahuja S., Sriram K. Non-nutritive sweeteners: Review and update. Nutrition 2013, 29(11-12):1293-1299.
39. Spence C., Piqueras-Fiszman B. The perfect meal the multisensory science of food and dining 2014, Wiley Blackwell, Chichester. 1st ed.
40. Sylvetsky A.C., Welsh J.A., Brown R.J., Vos M.B. Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2012, 96(3):640-646.
41. Tandel K.R. Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 2011, 2(4):236-243.
42. Thompson J.L., M.A., D., Lopetscharat K., Yates M.D. Sensory and nutritive qualities of food preference mapping of commercial chocolate milks. Journal of Food Science 2004, 69(9):406-413.
43. Zorn S., Alcaire F., Vidal L., Giménez A., Ares G. Application of multiple-sip temporal dominance of sensations to the evaluation of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 36:135-143.