Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 2403-2410

  Berrendero, S ^a   Salido, M P ^a   Valverde, A ^a   Ferreiroa, A ^a   Pradies G ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

All ceramic crowns; CAD CAM; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner; Marginal fit; Replica technique; Trios scanner

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMAN; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; SILICONES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84955241809     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1714-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Gardner F (1982) Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 48:396–400
2. Hunter A, Hunter AR (1990) Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discusion II. Discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 64:636–642
3. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Richter J, Edelhoff D, Wolfgang G (2009) Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia crowns copings. Quintessence Int 40:243–250
4. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O (2013) Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110:447–454 e10. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003
5. Martinez-Rus F, Suarez MJ, Rivera B, Pradies G (2011) Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 105:108–114. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60009-7
6. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LI, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH (2007) Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20:383–388
7. KL K, Campbell CS (2000) Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 84:492–498
8. Mitchell CA, Pintado MR (2001) Nondestructive, in vitro quantification of crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 85:575–584
9. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179
10. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schimitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579–584
11. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M (2009) Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 117:319–325
12. McLean J, Von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vitro technique. Br Dent J 13:107–111
13. Al-Bakri IAHD, Al-Omari WM (2007) The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent 18:29–33
14. Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated resto- rations. Br Dent J 204:505–511
15. JEK A e S, Edelhoff D, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF (2014) Marginal internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest 18:515–523
16. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB (2008) Dental impression using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 29:494–505
17. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the cur- rent problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139:761–763
18. Suárez M, González de Villaumbrosia P, Pradíes G, Lozano J (2003) Comparison of the marginal fit Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 16:229–233
19. Conrad H, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98:389–404
20. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
21. Duret F (1996) CAD/CAM in dentistry: present and future applications. In current concepts. Quintessence Int 27:433–436
22. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A (2014) Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 42:677–683
23. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Invest 17:1759–1764. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
24. Logozzo S, Zannetti EM, Franceschini G (2014) Recent advances in dental optics. Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng 54:203–221
25. Wismeijer D, Mans R, Van Genuchten M, Reijers HA (2014) Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (intraoral scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 25:1113–1118
26. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health 14
27. Fasbinder DJ (2010) Innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 31:2–11
28. Brawek SW, Wolfarts S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest 17:2119–2125. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5
29. Ender A, Melh A (2013) Influence of scanind strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int Comput Dent 16:11–21
30. Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, Melo AO, Silva LM, Oliveira JL, Oliveira PC, et al. (2012) Internal fit of two all ceramic systems and metal ceramic crowns. J App Oral Sci 20:235–240
31. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD-CAM. J Dent 35:68–73
32. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116:272–279
33. Souza ROA, Özcan M, Pavanelli CA, Buso L, Lombardo GH, Michida SM, Mesquita AM, Bottino MA (2012) Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM system. J Prosthodont 21:94–100
34. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns validation of the silicone replic method. J Oral Rehabil 35:116–122
35. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U (2011) Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Invest 15:521–526
36. Pradíes G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martínez-Rus F (2015) Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent Feb 43:201–208
37. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik W (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent:405–408
38. Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B (2015) Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Invest 19(8):2027–2034
39. Keul C, Stawarczy B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study. Dent Mater J 30:400–407
40. Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Temes J, Oliver-Parra R (2014) Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design. J Prosthet Dent 112:155–162
41. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C (2014) A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112:555–560
42. Fahmy NZ (2011) Influence of veneering materials on the marginal fit and fracture resistance of an alumina core system. J Prosthodont 20:45–51
43. Ferreira Quintas A, Oliveira F, Bottino MA (2004) Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with differents ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 92:250–257
44. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA (2009) Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Invest 13:34–39
45. Grenade C, Mainjot A, Vanheusden A (2011) Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between vairous manufacuring processes. J Prosthet Dent 105:249–255