Big data, organizational learning, and sensemaking: Theorizing interpretive challenges under conditions of dynamic complexity

Management Learning

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 65-82

  Calvard, Thomas Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Big data; complexity; learning; organizing; reflexivity; sensemaking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954461142     PISSN: 13505076     EISSN: 14617307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1350507615592113     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. F.Allard-Poesi (2005) The paradox of sensemaking in organizational analysis. Organization12(2): 169–196.
2. J.Q.AndersonL.Rainie (2012) Big data: Experts say new forms of information analysis will help people be more nimble and adaptive, but worry over humans’ capacity to understand and use these new tools well. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC, 20July.
3. E.Antonacopoulou (2014) The experience of learning in space and time. Prometheus32(1): 83–91.
4. E.AntonacopoulouR.Chiva (2007) The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning38(3): 277–295.
5. E.AntonacopoulouZ.Sheaffer (2014) Learning in crisis: Rethinking the relationship between organizational learning and crisis management. Journal of Management Inquiry23(1): 5–21.
6. L.Argote (2011) Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management Learning42(4): 439–446.
7. C.Argyris (1976) Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly21(3): 363–375.
8. C.Argyris (2003) A life full of learning. Organization Studies24(7): 1178–1192.
9. C.Argyris (2004) Reflection and beyond in research on organizational learning. Management Learning35(4): 507–509.
10. R.Arnaout (2012) Elementary, my dear Doctor Watson. Clinical Chemistry58(6): 986–988.
11. T.BakkenT.Hernes (2006) Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. Organization Studies27(11): 1599–1616.
12. S.R.Barley (1996) Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work back into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly41(3): 404–441.
13. S.R.BarleyG.Kunda (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly37(3): 363–399.
14. D.BartonD.Court (2012) Making advanced analytics work for you: A practical guide to capitalizing on big data. Harvard Business Review90(10): 73–83.
15. A.Berthoz (2012) Simplexity: Simplifying Principles for a Complex World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. K.BjørkengS.CleggT.Pitsis (2009) Becoming (a) practice. Management Learning40(2): 145–159.
17. M.BoisotB.McKelvey (2010) Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. Academy of Management Review35(3): 415–433.
18. E.BoxenbaumL.Rouleau (2011) New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organization theory. Academy of Management Review36(2): 272–296.
19. D.BoydK.Crawford (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 662–679.
20. G.D.Brewer (1999) The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences32(4): 327–337.
21. A.D.BrownY.GabrielS.Gherardi (2009) Storytelling and change: An unfolding story. Organization16(3): 323–333.
22. B.BrownM.ChuiJ.Manyika (2011) Are you ready for the era of “big data”? Report, McKinsey Global Institute, October, San Francisco, CA.
23. J.M.Bryant (2004) An evolutionary social science? A skeptic’s brief, theoretical and substantive. Philosophy of the Social Sciences34(4): 451–492.
24. B.Burnes (2005) Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews7(2): 73–90.
25. J.M.CaltonS.L.Payne (2003) Coping with paradox: Multi-stakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems. Business & Society42(1): 7–42.
26. M.ChanJ.RobertsonM.Milian (2014) Saving the world? How big data is tackling everything from cancer to slavery. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2014-06-03/saving-the-world-how-big-data-is-tackling-everything-from-cancer-to-slavery.html#slide8 (accessed 1 October 2014).
27. S.R.CleggM.KornbergerC.Rhodes (2005) Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization12(2): 147–167.
28. I.D.ColvilleA.D.BrownA.Pye (2012) Simplexity: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. Human Relations65(1): 5–15.
29. I.D.ColvilleB.HennestadK.Thoner (2013a) Organizing, changing and learning: A sensemaking perspective on an ongoing “soap story.”Management Learning45(2): 216–234.
30. I.D.ColvilleA.PyeM.Carter (2013b) Organizing to counter terrorism: Sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity. Human Relations66(9): 1201–1223.
31. K.G.CorleyD.A.Gioia (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review36(1): 12–32.
32. M.P.CunhaA.Rego (2010) Complexity, simplicity, simplexity. European Management Journal28(2): 85–94.
33. A.L.Cunliffe (2002) Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning33(1): 35–61.
34. A.L.CunliffeC.Coupland (2012) From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations65(1): 63–88.
35. B.Czarniawska (2006) A golden braid_ Allport, Goffman, Weick. Organization Studies27(11): 1661–1674.
36. T.H.Davenport (2013) Analytics 3.0. Harvard Business Review91(12): 64–72.
37. T.H.DavenportD.J.Patil (2012) Data scientist: The sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review90(10): 70–76.
38. T.H.DavenportP.BarthR.Bean (2012) How “big data” is different. MIT Sloan Management Review54(1): 22–24.
39. T.H.DavenportJ.HarrisJ.Shapiro (2010) Competing on talent analytics. Harvard Business Review88(10): 52–58.
40. A.DaviesD.FidlerM.Gorbis (2011) Future work skills 2020. Report, Institute for the Future, Palo Alto, CA, April.
41. D.DeanM.LouisonH.Shoji. (2013) Through the mobile looking glass: The transformative potential of mobile technologies. Report, The Boston Consulting Group, April, Boston, MA.
42. M.Easterby-SmithM.CrossanD.Nicolini (2000) Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies37(6): 783–796.
43. B.Elkjaer (2004) Organizational learning: The “third way.”Management Learning35(4): 419–434.
44. P.EvansT.Wurster (1997) Strategy and the new economics of information. Harvard Business Review75(5): 70–82.
45. J.Fendt (2013) Lost in translation? On mind and matter in management research. SAGE Open3(2): 1–13.
46. C.M.FiolM.A.Lyles (1985) Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review10(4): 803–813.
47. M.Foucault (2002) The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
48. P.FoxJ.Hendler (2011) Changing the equation on scientific data visualization. Science331:705–708.
49. D.A.Garvin (2013) How Google sold its engineers on management. Harvard Business Review91(12): 74–82.
50. G.GeorgeM.R.HaasA.Pentland (2014) Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal57(2): 321–326.
51. A.GrandoriB.Kogut (2002) Dialogue on organization and knowledge. Organization Science13(3): 224–231.
52. T.L.Griffith (1999) Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review24(3): 472–488.
53. T.HernesE.J.Irgens (2013) Keeping things mindfully on track: Organizational learning under continuity. Management Learning44(3): 253–266.
54. T.HernesS.Maitlis (2010) Process, sensemaking, and organizing: An introduction. In: (eds) Process, Sensemaking, and Organizing. New York: Oxford University Press, 27–37.
55. L.K.HesselsH.Van Lente (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy37(4): 740–760.
56. B.G.Hoffman (2013) American Icon: Alan Mulally and the Fight to Save Ford Motor Company. New York: Crown Publishing.
57. R.Holland (1999) Reflexivity. Human Relations52(4): 463–484.
58. D.HoweM.ConstanzoP.Fey. (2008) The future of biocuration. Nature455(7209): 47–50.
59. D.Huff (1991) How to Lie With Statistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
60. J.HurwitzA.NugentF.Halper. (2013) Big Data for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
61. P.JohnsonJ.Duberley (2003) Reflexivity in management research. Journal of Management Studies40(5): 1279–1303.
62. S.Jordan (2010) Learning to be surprised: How to foster reflective practice in a high-reliability context. Management Learning41(4): 391–413.
63. P.KaipaM.Kriger (2010) Empowerment, vision, and positive leadership: An interview with Alan Mulally, former CEO, Boeing Commercial—current CEO, Ford Motor Company. Journal of Management Inquiry19(2): 110–115.
64. M.KilduffA.MehraM.B.Dunn (2011) From blue sky research to problem solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production. Academy of Management Review36(2): 297–317.
65. I.King (2014) Big data is really about small things. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-04/big-data-is-really-about-small-things.html (accessed 1 October 2014).
66. R.Kitchin (2014) Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society1(1): 1–12.
67. G.KleinB.MoonR.R.Hoffman (2006) Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems21(4): 70–73.
68. J.T.Klein (2004) Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. Emergence: Complexity & Organization6(1/2): 2–10.
69. J.Kluger (2008) Simplexity: The Simple Rules of a Complex World. London: John Murray.
70. N.Lazar (2013) The big picture: The arts—Digitized, quantified, and analyzed. CHANCE26(4): 42–45.
71. D.LazerR.KennedyG.King. (2014) The parable of Google Flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science343(6176): 1203–1205.
72. M.Learmonth (2008) Evidence-based management: A backlash against pluralism in organizational studies?Organization15(2): 283–291.
73. P.M.LeonardiS.R.Barley (2007) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals4(1): 1–51.
74. L.Lessig (1999) Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
75. A.McAfeeE.Brynjolfsson (2012) Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review90(10): 60–68.
76. M.W.McElroy (2000) Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management4(3): 195–203.
77. R.B.MacKay (2009) Counterfactual and prospective sensemaking in enacted environments. In: (eds) Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 90–112.
78. S.McKenna (1999) Learning through complexity. Management Learning30(3): 301–320.
79. S.MaitlisM.Christianson (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals8(1): 57–125.
80. S.MaitlisS.Sonenshein (2010) Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies47(3): 551–580.
81. S.M.Manson (2001) Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum32(3): 405–414.
82. J.ManyikaM.ChuiP.Groves. (2013) Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. Report, McKinsey Global Institute, October, San Francisco, CA.
83. V.Mayer-SchönbergerK.Cukier (2013) Big Data: R revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.
84. D.Miller (1993) The architecture of simplicity. Academy of Management Review18(1): 116–138.
85. J.Moran (2010) Interdisciplinarity. New York: Routledge.
86. K.Morrell (2008) The narrative of “evidence based” management: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies45(3): 613–635.
87. T.Nagel (1986) The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88. D.NicoliniM.B.Meznar (1995) The social construction of organizational learning: Conceptual and practical issues in the field. Human Relations48(7): 727–746.
89. D.NicoliniJ.MengisJ.Swan (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science23(3): 612–629.
90. A.Örtenblad (2007) Senge’s many faces: Problem or opportunity?The Learning Organization14(2): 108–122.
91. M.A.ParsonsØ.GodøyE.LeDrew. (2011) A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science. Journal of Information Science37(6): 555–569.
92. M.PedlerK.Trehan (2008) Action learning, organisational research and the “wicked” problems. Action Learning: Research and Practice5(3): 203–205.
93. A.Pentland (2014) Social Physics. New York: Penguin.
94. C.Rudder (2014) Dataclysm: Who We Are When We Think No One’s Looking. London: Fourth Estate.
95. R.D.Sack (1988) The consumer’s world: Place as context. Annals of the Association of American Geographers78(4): 642–664.
96. J.SandbergH.Tsoukas (2014) Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior 36(S1): S6–S32.
97. D.R.Schwandt (2005) When managers become philosophers: Integrating learning with sensemaking. Academy of Management Learning & Education4(2): 176–192.
98. P.M.Senge (1990) The Fifth Discipline. London: Century Business.
99. M.Serres (1995) Genesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
100. S.K.ShahK.G.Corley (2006) Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. Journal of Management Studies43(8): 1821–1835.
101. C.ShepherdR.Challenger (2013) Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: A rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews15(2): 225–244.
102. P.M.Shields (1998) Pragmatism as a philosophy of science: A tool for public administration. In: (ed.) Research in Public Administration, vol. 4. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 195–226.
103. F.SiedlokP.Hibbert (2014) The organization of interdisciplinary research: Modes, drivers and barriers. International Journal of Management Reviews16(2): 194–210.
104. A.SiegelI.Etzkorn (2013) Simple: Conquering the Crisis of Complexity. London: Random House.
105. D.SkyrmeD.Amidon (1997) The knowledge agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management1(1): 27–37.
106. W.K.SmithM.W.Lewis (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review36(2): 381–403.
107. I.StiglianiD.Ravasi (2012) Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1232–1259.
108. A.SwidlerJ.Arditi (1996) The new sociology of knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology20: 305–329.
109. J.SyedJ.MingersP.A.Murray (2009) Beyond rigour and relevance: A critical realist approach to business education. Management Learning41(1): 71–85.
110. Á.Takács (2004) Between theory and history: On the interdisciplinary practice in Michel Foucault’s work. Modern Language Notes119(4): 869–884.
111. D.Tourish (2013) “Evidence based management” or “evidence oriented organizing”? A critical realist perspective. Organization20(20): 173–192.
112. M.Van Rijmenam (2014) Think Bigger: Developing a Successful Big Data Strategy for Your Business. New York: Amacom.
113. K.WeberM.A.Glynn (2006) Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies27(11): 1639–1660.
114. K.E.Weick (1969) The Social Psychology of Organizing. 1st edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
115. K.E.Weick (1992) Agenda setting in organizational behavior: A theory-focused approach. Journal of Management Inquiry1(3): 171–182.
116. K.E.Weick (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
117. K.E.Weick (2012) Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations65(1): 141–153.
118. K.E.WeickK.H.Roberts (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 357–381.
119. K.E.WeickF.Westley (1999) Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In: (eds) The Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 440–458.
120. K.E.WeickK.M.SutcliffeD.Obstfeld (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science16(4): 409–421.
121. A.C.WicksR.E.Freeman (1998) Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science9(2): 123–140.
122. N.A.WorrenK.MooreR.Elliott (2002) When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity. Human Relations55(10): 1227–1250.
123. A.Wright (2005) The role of scenarios as prospective sensemaking devices. Management Decision43(1): 86–101.
124. C.Zins (2007) Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58(4): 479–493.
125. D.Zolo (1990) Reflexive epistemology and social complexity: The philosophical legacy of Otto Neurath. Philosophy of the Social Sciences20(2): 149–169.