Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration

Organization Science

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 612-629

  Nicolini, Davide ^a   Mengis, Jeanne ^b   Swan, Jacky ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Activity theory; Artifacts; Boundaries; Boundary object; cross disciplinary collaboration; Epistemic object; Ethnography; Infrastructure; Practice based studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863108403     PISSN: 10477039     EISSN: 15265455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0664     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alvesson, M. 1996. Communication, Power and Organization. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
2. Bartel, C. A., R. Garud. 2003. Narrative knowledge in action: Adaptive abduction as a mechanism for knowledge creation and exchange in organizations. M. Eastery-Smith, M. A. Lyles, eds. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Blackwell, Malden, MA, 324-342.
3. Bechky, B. A. 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3) 312-330.
4. Bechky, B. A. 2006. Talking about machines, thick description, and knowledge work. Organ. Stud. 27(12) 1757-1768.
5. Boland, R. J., Jr., R. V. Tenkasi. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4) 350-372.
6. Carlile, P. R. 2002. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4) 442-455.
7. Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5) 555-568.
8. Carlile, P. R., E. S. Rebentisch. 2003. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. 49(9) 1180-1195.
9. Clegg, C. W., T. D. Wall, K. Pepper, C. Stride, D. Woods, D. Morrison, J. Cordery et al. 2002. An international survey of the use and effectiveness of modern manufacturing practices. Human Factors Ergonomics Manufacturing 12(2) 171-191.
10. Corlett, W. S. 1989. Community Without Unity: A Politics of Derridian Extravagance. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
11. Dougherty, D. 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2) 179-202.
12. Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta Konsultit, Helsinki, Finland.
13. Engeström, Y. 1995. Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence Medicine 7(5) 395-412.
14. Engeström, Y., F. Blackler. 2005. On the life of the object. Organization 12(3) 307-330.
15. Ewenstein, B., J. Whyte. 2009. Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as epistemic objects. Organ. Stud. 30(1) 7-30.
16. Gubrium, J. F., J. A. Holstein. 2007. The construction mosaic. J. A. Holstein, J. F. Gubrium, eds. Handbook of Constructionist Research. Guilford Press, New York, 3-12.
17. Hanseth, O., N. Lundberg. 2001. Designing work oriented infrastructures. J. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 10(3-4) 347-372.
18. Henderson, K. 1991. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci., Tech. Human Values 16(4) 448-473.
19. Kaptelinin, V., B. A. Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Knorr Cetina, K. 1997. Sociality with objects. Theory, Culture Soc. 14(4) 1-30.
21. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Koskinen, K. U. 2005. Metaphoric boundary objects as co-ordinating mechanisms in the knowledge sharing of innovation processes. Eur. J. Innovation Management 8(3) 323-335.
23. Latour, B. 1996. On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, Activity 3(4) 228-245.
24. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor- Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
25. Law, J. 2002. On hidden heterogeneities: Complexity, formalism, and aircraft design. J. Law, A. Mol, eds. Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 116-141.
26. Lawler, E. E., S. Mohrman, G. Ledford. 1992. Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
27. Leont'ev, A. N. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
28. Levina, N. 2005. Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2) 109-130.
29. Levina, N., E. Vaast. 2005. The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2) 335-363.
30. Miettinen, R. 2005. Object of activity and individual motivation. Mind, Culture, Activity 12(1) 53-69
31. Miettinen, R., J. Virkkunen. 2005. Epistemic objects, artefacts, and organizational change. Organization 12(3) 437-456.
32. Nicolini, D. 2009. Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30(12) 1391-1418.
33. Nicolini, D. 2011. Practice as the site of knowing: Insights from the field of telemedicine. Organ. Sci. 22(3) 602-620.
34. Okhuysen, G., B. Bechky. 2009. Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective. Ann. Acad. Management 3(1) 463-502.
35. Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3) 249-273.
36. Orlikowski, W. J. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9) 1435-1448.
37. Orlikowski, W. J. 2010. The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge J. Econom. 34(1) 125-141.
38. Orr, J. E. 1996. Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
39. Osterlund, C., P. Carlile. 2003. How practice matters: A relational view of knowledge sharing. M. Huysman, E. Wenger, V. Wulf, eds. Communities and Technologies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1-22.
40. Oswick, C., M. Robertson. 2009. Boundary objects reconsidered: From bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. J. Change Management 9(2) 179-193.
41. Pawlowski, S. D., D. Robey. 2004. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. 28(4) 645-672.
42. Rafaeli, A., M. G. Pratt. 2006. Artifacts and Organization: Beyond Mere Symbolism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
43. Rheinberger, H. 2005. A reply to David Bloor: "Toward a sociology of epistemic things." Perspect. Sci. 13(3) 406-410.
44. Rheinberger, H.-J. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
45. Silverman, B. S. 2007. A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book About Qualitative Research. Sage, London.
46. Spradley, J. P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
47. Star, S. L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. Amer. Behav. Sci. 43(3) 377-391.
48. Star, S. L. 2010. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci., Tech. Human Values 35(5) 601-617.
49. Star, S. L., J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3) 389-420.
50. Star, S. L., K. Ruhleder. 1996. Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1) 111-134.
51. Strauss, A. L. 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. Columbia University Press, New York.
52. Suchman, L. A. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, New York.
53. Swan, J. 2006. Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's "Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability." Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(5) 467-469.
54. Swan, J., M. Bresnen, S. Newell, M. Robertson. 2007. The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations 60(12) 1809-1837.
55. Taylor, J. R., D. Robichaud. 2004. Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organization 11(3) 395-413.
56. Trist, E., K. Bamforth. 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations 4(1) 3-38.
57. Trompette, P., D. Vinck. 2009. Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 3(1) 3-25.
58. Wartofsky, M. W. 1979. Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding. Riedel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
59. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, New York.
60. Yanow, D., P. Schwartz-Shea, eds. 2006. Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
61. Zeiss, R., P. Groenewegen. 2009. Engaging boundary objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the subtleties of layered engagement. Organization 16(1) 81-100.