Our future scientists: A review of stereotype threat in girls from early elementary school to middle school

Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale

Volumn 27, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 13-51

  Régner, Isabelle ^a   Steele, Jennifer R ^b   Ambady, Nalini ^c   Thinus Blanc, Catherine ^a   Huguet, Pascal ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Gender; Math; Science; Stereotype threat

Indexed keywords

EID: 84953402791     PISSN: 0992986X     EISSN: 21194130     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00127.x
3. Akshoomoff, N. A., & Stiles, J. (1995). Developmental trends in visuospatial analysis and planning: 1. Copying a complex figure. Neuropsychology, 9, 364-377. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.9.3.378
4. Ambady, N., Paik, S. K., Steele, J., Owen-Smith, A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.003
5. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12(5), 385-390. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00371
6. Appel, M., & Kronberger, N. (2012). Stereotypes and the achievement gap: Stereotype threat prior to test taking. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 609-635. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9200-4
7. Appel, M., Kronberger, N., & Aaronson, A. (2011). Stereotype threat impairs ability building: Effects on test preparation among women in science and technology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 904-913. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.835
8. Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 83-103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Bagès, C., & Martinot, D. (2011). What is the best model for girls and boys faced with a standardized mathematics evaluation situation: A hardworking role model or a gifted role model? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 536-543. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02017.x.
10. Barres, B. A. (2006). Does Gender Matter? Nature, 442, 133-136. doi: 10.1038/442133a
11. Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320-335. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.103.2.320
12. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264. doi: 10.1126/science.7434028
13. Benokraitis, N. V., & Feagin, J. R. (1995). Modern Sexism (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Blanton, H., Crocker, J., & Miller, D. T. (2000). The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 519-530. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1425
15. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., & Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 267-285. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.145
16. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16, 572-578. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x
17. Cadinu, M., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.661
18. Chan, N. H. W., & Rosenthal, H. E. S. (2014). Working memory moderates stereotype threat effects for adolescents in Hong Kong. International Review of Social Psychology / Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27, 103-118.
19. Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of "model minority" status. Psychological Science, 11, 399-402. doi:10.1111/ 1467-9280.00277
20. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307-1310. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317
21. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap. Science, 324, 400-403. doi: 10.1126/science.1170769
22. Croizet, J. C., & Després, G. (2003, February). How does stereotype threat undermine performance? Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology's Annual Meeting, Los Angeles.
23. Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math- gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child development, 82, 766-779. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
24. Davies, P. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2005). The gender-gap artifact: Women's underperformance in quantitative domains through the lens of stereotype threat. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 172-188). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628. doi: 10.1177/014616702237644 del
26. Río, M. F., & Strasser, K. (2013). Preschool children's beliefs about gender differences in academic skills. Sex Roles, 68, 231-238. doi: 10.1007/s11199-012-0195-6
27. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
28. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139-1150. doi:10.1177/ 01461672952111002
29. Dovidio, J. F., Glick, P., & Rudman, L. (Eds.). (2005). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
30. Enea-Drapeau, C., Carlier, M., & Huguet, P. (2012). Tracking subtle stereotypes of children with Trisomy 21: From facial-feature- based to implicit stereotyping. PLoS ONE, 7(4). doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0034369
31. Dumas, F., Huguet, P., Monteil, J-M., Rastoul, C., & Nezlek, J. B. (2005). Social comparison in the classroom: Is there a tendency to compare upward in elementary school? Current Research in Social Psychology, 10, 166-187.
32. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
33. Eisenberg, N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (1996). Gender development and gender effects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 358-396). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
34. Entwistle, D. R., Alexander, K. L., Pallas, A. M., & Cardigan, D. (1987). The emergent academic self-image of first graders: Its response to social structure. Child Development, 58, 1190-1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1987.tb01451.x
35. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 77-94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.77
36. Galdi, S., Cadinu, M., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). The roots of stereotype threat: When automatic associations disrupt girls' math performance. Child Development, 85, 250-263. doi: 10.1111/ cdev.12128
37. Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: What we know and what we need to know. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 316-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Ganley, C. M., Mingle, L. A., Ryan, A. M., Ryan, K., Vasilyeva, M., & Perry, M. (2013). An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls' mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1886-1897. doi: 10.1037/a0031412
39. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
40. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464
41. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
42. Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Huguet, P., Brunot, S., & Monteil, J-M. (2001). Geometry versus drawing: Changing the meaning of the task as a means to change performance. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 219-234. doi: 10.1023/a:1011374700020
44. Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Régner, I., Wheeler, L., Suls, J., ... Nezlek, J. (2009). Clarifying the Relationships Between the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect (BFLPE) and Social Comparison: An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 156-170. doi: 10.1037/a0015558
45. Huguet, P., & Monteil, J. M. (1995). The influence of social comparison with less fortunate others on task performance: The role of gender motivations or appropriate norms. Sex Roles, 33, 753-765.
46. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2007). Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 545-560. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545
47. Huguet, P., & Régner, I. (2009). Counter-stereotypic beliefs in math do not protect school girls from stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1024-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.029
48. Huston, A. C. (1987). The development of sex typing: Themes from recent research. In S. Chess & A. Thomas (Eds.), Annual progress in child psychiatry and child development (pp. 168-186). New York: Brunner/ Mazel.
49. Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual review of psychology, 65, 373-398. doi: 10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115057
50. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-145. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139
51. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494-495. doi: 10.1126/science.1160364
52. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314, 599-600. doi: 10.1126/ science.1132154
53. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00272
54. Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2012). Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.932
56. Jacobs, J. E., Davis-Kean, P., Bleeker, M., Eccles, J. S., & Malanchuk, O. (2005). I can but I don't want to: The impact of parents, interests, and activities on gender differences in math. In. A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 246-263). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child development, 73(2), 509-527. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00421
58. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle. Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175-179. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.x
59. Kaminski, D., & Sheridan, M. E. (1984). Children's perception of sex stereotyping: A five-year study. International Journal of Women's Studies, 7, 24-36.
60. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007a). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18(1), 13-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01841.x
61. Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007b). Implicit stereotypes and women's math performance: How implicit math-gender stereotypes influence women's susceptibility to stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 825-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.08.004
62. Kirkwood, M. W., Weiler, M. D., Bernstein, J. H., Forbes, P. W., & Waber, D. P. (2001). Sources of poor performance on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test among children with learning difficulties: A dynamic assessment approach. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 345-356. doi: 10.1076/clin.15.3.345.10268
63. Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A metaanalysis. Psychological bulletin, 136, 1123-1135. doi: 10.1037/ a0021276
64. Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1990). Gender differences in beliefs and achievement in mathematics: A cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 26, 254-263. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254
65. Martin, C. L., Wood, C. H., & Little, J. K. (1990). The development of gender stereotype components. Child Development, 61, 1891-1904. doi: 10.2307/1130845
66. Martinot, D., Bagès, C., & Désert, M. (2012). French children's awareness of gender stereotypes about mathematics and reading: When girls improve their reputation in math. Sex Roles, 66, 210-219. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0032-3
67. Martinot, D., & Désert, M. (2007). Awareness of a gender stereotype, personal beliefs and self-perceptions regarding math ability: When boys do not surpass girls. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 455-471. doi:10.1007/s11218-007-9028-9
68. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting female students' math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1185-1197. doi: 10.1177/01461672022812004
69. Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Reducing adolescent girls' concerns about STEM stereotypes: When do female teachers matter? International Review of Social Psychology / Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27, 79-102.
70. McIntyre, R. B., Lord, C. G., Gresky, D. M., Ten Eyck, L. L., Frye, G. D. J., & Bond, C. F. (2005). A social impact trend in the effects of role models on alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat. Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(9), 116-136. Retrieved February 9, from http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/ crisp/crisp.10.9.html
71. McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. M., & Lord, C. G. (2003). Alleviating women's mathematics stereotype through salience of group achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 83-90. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00513-9
72. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in cognitive sciences, 18(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
73. Mugny, G., & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
74. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). The "relative self ": Informational and judgmental consequences of comparative self-evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 23-38. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.23
75. Muzzatti, B., & Agnoli, F. (2007). Gender and mathematics: Attitudes and stereotype threat susceptibility in Italian children. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 747-759. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.747
76. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Gender differences in participation and completion of undergraduate education and how they have changed over time (NCES Publication No. NCES 2005169). Peter, K & Horn, L: Authors.
77. National Science Foundation (2013). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 (Special Report NSF 13-304). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/nsf13304-digest.pdf
78. Neuville, E., & Croizet, J. (2007). Can salience of gender identity impair math performance among 7-8 year old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 307-316. doi: 10.1007/bf03173428
79. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me= female, therefore math #me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44-59. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
80. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., ...Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593-10597. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.0809921106
81. OECD (2012). Program for international student assessment 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/ keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
82. Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a Minimal Group Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1399
83. Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students' performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1042-1072. doi: 10.1037/a0035740
84. Passolunghi, M. C., Ferreira, T. I. R., & Tomasetto, C. (2014). Math-gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.005
85. Powlishta, K. K. (1995). Intergroup processes in childhood: Social categorization and sex role development. Developmental Psychology, 31, 781-788. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.781
86. Régner, I., Smeding, A., Gimmig, D., Thinus-Blanc, C., Monteil, J.-M., & Huguet, P. (2010). Individual differences in working memory moderate stereotype threat effects. Psychological Science, 21, 1646-1648. doi: 10.1177/0956797610386619
87. Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans le cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. [Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286-340. doi: 10.3917/lcp.082.0020
88. Rydell, R. J., Rydell, M. T., & Boucher, K. (2010). The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 883-896. doi: 10.1037/ a0021139
89. Rydell, R. J., Shiffrin, R. M., Boucher, K. L., Van Loo, K., & Rydell, M. T. (2010). Stereotype threat prevents perceptual learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 14042-14047. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002815107
90. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201. doi: 10.1006/ jesp.2001.1500
91. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
92. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women's experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835-850. doi:10.1023/b:sers.0000029101.74557.a0
93. Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336-356. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
94. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68-74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00508-5
95. Shenouda, C. K., & Danovitch, J. H. (2014). Effects of gender stereotypes and stereotype threat on children's performance on a spatial task. International Review of Social Psychology / Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 27, 53-77.
96. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111
97. Siy, J. O., & Cheryan, S. (2013). When compliments fail to flatter: American individualism and responses to positive stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 87-102. doi: 10.1037/a0030183
98. Smeding, A., Dumas, F., Loose, F., & Régner, I. (2013). Order of administration of math and verbal tests: An ecological intervention to reduce stereotype threat on girls' math performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 850-860. doi: 10.1037/ a0032094
99. Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 177-206.
100. Souchal, C., Toczek, M. C., Darnon, C., Smeding, A., Butera, F., & Martinot, D. (2014). Assessing does not mean threatening: The purpose of assessment as a key determinant of girls and boys performance in a science class. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 125-136. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12012
101. Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist, 60, 950-958. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.60.9.950
102. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., & Lomore, C. D. (2001). Maintaining one's self-image vis-à-vis others: The role of self-affirmation in the social evaluation of the self. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 41-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1010659805978
103. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
104. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.6.613
105. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.797
106. Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2003). Stereotype threat and employment testing: A commentary. Human Performance, 16, 311-326. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1603-7
107. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
108. Steele, J. R. (2003). Children's gender stereotypes about math: The role of stereotype stratification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2587-2606. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02782.x
109. Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). "Math is Hard!": The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 428-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003
110. Steele, J. R., & Barling, J. (1996). Influence of maternal genderrole beliefs and role satisfaction on daughters' vocational interests. Sex Roles, 34, 637-648. doi: 10.1007/bf01551499
111. Steele, J. R., James, J., & Barnett, R. (2002). Learning in a man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00042
112. Steele, J. R., Reisz, L., Williams, A., & Kawakami, K. (2007). Women in mathematics: Examining the hidden barriers that gender stereotypes can impose. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp.159-183). London: Edward Elgar.
113. Steele, J. R., Williams, A., & Mills, L. (2010, January). The development of math=male: Implicit academic stereotyping in young children. In J. Stout & N. Dasgupta (Chairs), Do I belong here? Identifying factors that fortify vs. attenuate women's sense of belonging in stereotypically masculine academic and professional domains. Symposium conducted at the 11th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Las Vegas, NE.
114. Steele, J. R., Williams, A., Reisz, L., Loi, A., & Shapiro, D. (2014). The development of math = male: Consequences for academic identification and performance. Unpublished manuscript.
115. Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324-335. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x
116. Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., & Noack, P. (2010). On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 947-963. doi: 10.1037/a0019920
117. Summers, L. (2005, January 14). Remarks at NBER conference on diversifying the science and engineering workforce. Retrieved March 25, 2006 from http://www.harvard.edu/president/speeches/ summers-2005/nber.php
118. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
119. Taylor, V. J., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Stereotype threat undermines academic learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1055-1067. doi: 10.1177/0146167211406506
120. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2003). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of inequities? Developmental Psychology, 39, 34-47. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.1.34
121. Tietjen, J. S. (2004). Why so few women, still? IEEE Spectrum, 41, 57-58. doi: 10.1109/mspec.2004.1338788
122. Tomasetto, C., Alparone, F. R., & Cadinu, M. (2011). Girls'math performance under stereotype threat: The moderating role of mothers' gender stereotypes. Developmental Psychology, 47, 943-949. doi: 10.1037/a0024047
123. Wang, M. T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770-775. doi: 10.1177/ 0956797612458937
124. Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2007). Assimilation in social comparison: Can we agree on what it is? International Review of Social Psychology / Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20, 31-51.
125. Yee, M., & Brown, R. (1994). The development of gender differentiation in young children. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 183-196. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01017.x