Male behaviour predicts trait divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma)

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 112, Issue , 2016, Pages 179-186

  Martin, Michael D ^a   Mendelson, Tamra C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Etheostoma; Female mate choice; Male competition; Male mate choice; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DIVERGENCE; MALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; PERCIFORM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANHINGIDAE; ANIMALIA; ETHEOSTOMA; PERCIDAE; PISCES;

EID: 84953385395     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson C.N., Grether G.F. Character displacement in the fighting colours of Hetaerina damselflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 277:3669-3675.
2. Anderson C.N., Grether G.F. Interspecific aggression and character displacement of competitor recognition in Hetaerina damselflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 277:549-555.
3. Arnegard M.E., McIntyre P.B., Harmon L.J., Zelditch M.L., Crampton W.G., Davis J.K., et al. Sexual signal evolution outpaces ecological divergence during electric fish species radiation. American Naturalist 2010, 176:335-356. 10.1086/655221.
4. Berglund A., Bisazza A., Pilastro A. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1996, 58:385-399. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x.
5. Berglund A., Rosenqvist G. Sex role reversal in pipefish. Advances in the Study of Behavior 2003, 32:131-167. 10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01003-9.
6. Bossu C.M., Near T.J. Ecological constraint and the evolution of sexual dichromatism in darters. Evolution 2015, 69(5):1219-1231. 10.1111/evo.12655.
7. Boughman J.W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 2001, 411:944-948.
8. Boughman J.W. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2002, 17:571-577. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02595-8.
9. Ciccotto P.J., Gumm J.M., Mendelson T.C. Male association preference for conspecifics in the redband darter, Etheostoma luteovinctum (Teleostei: Percidae) based on visual cues. Copeia 2013, 2013:154-159. 10.1643/CE-12-056.
10. Ciccotto P.J., Gumm J.M., Mendelson T.C. No evidence for color or size preference in either sex of a dichromatic stream fish, Percina roanoka. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2014, 97(2):187-195. 10.1007/s10641-013-0140-8.
11. Ciccotto P.J., Mendelson T.C. The ecological drivers of nuptial color evolution in darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) 2015, Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Clotfelter E.D., Ardia D.R., McGraw K.J. Red fish, blue fish: trade-offs between pigmentation and immunity in Betta splendens. Behavioral Ecology 2007, 18:1139-1145.
13. Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex 1871, J. Murray, London, U.K.
14. Edward D.A., Chapman T. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2011, 26:647-654. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.012.
15. Endler J.A. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 1992, 139(Suppl.):S125-S153. 10.1086/285308.
16. Etnier D.A., Starnes W.C. The fishes of Tennessee 1993, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN. 1st ed.
17. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 1985, 125:1-15.
18. Fisher R.A. The genetical theory of natural selection 1930, Clarendon, Oxford, U.K.
19. Forsgren E., Amundsen T., Borg A.A., Bjelvenmark J. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 2004, 429:551-554.
20. Fuller R.C. Disentangling female mate choice and male competition in the rainbow darter, Etheostoma caeruleum. Copeia 2003, 2003:138-148.
21. Godin J.-G.J., Auld H.L. Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish. Ecology and Evolution 2013, 3:2020-2029. 10.1002/ece3.607.
22. Gregorio O., Berdan E., Kozak G., Fuller R. Reinforcement of male mate preferences in sympatric killifish species Lucania goodei and Lucania parva. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2012, 66:1429-1436. 10.1007/s00265-012-1398-0.
23. Grether G.F. The neuroecology of competitor recognition. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2011, 51(5):807-818. 10.1093/icb/icr060.
24. Grether G.F., Losin N., Anderson C.N., Okamoto K. The role of interspecific interference competition in character displacement and the evolution of competitor recognition. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2009, 84:617-635. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00089.x.
25. Hunt J., Breuker C.J., Sadowski J.A., Moore A.J. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2009, 22:13-26. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01633.x.
26. Jiggins C.D., Naisbit R.E., Coe R.L., Mallet J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 2001, 411:302-305.
27. Johannesson K., Havenhand J.N., Jonsson P.R., Lindegarth M., Sundin A., Hollander J. Male discrimination of female mucous trails permits assortative mating in a marine snail species. Evolution 2008, 62:3178-3184. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00510.x.
28. Johnston C.E., Johnson D.L. Sound production during the spawning season in cavity-nesting darters of the subgenus Catonotus (Percidae: Etheostoma). Copeia 2000, 2000:475-481. 10.2307/1448195.
29. Kokko H., Monaghan P. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:159-165. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00212.x.
30. Kozak G.M., Roland G., Rankhorn C., Falater A., Berdan E.L., Fuller R.C. Behavioral isolation due to cascade reinforcement in Lucania killifish. American Naturalist 2015, 185(4):491-506. 10.1086/680023.
31. Lackey A.C.R., Boughman J.W. Divergent sexual selection via male competition: ecology is key. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2013, 26:1611-1624. 10.1111/jeb.12173.
32. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1981, 78:3721-3725.
33. Leal M., Fleishman L.J. Differences in visual signal design and detectability between allopatric populations of Anolis lizards. American Naturalist 2004, 163:26-39. 10.1086/379794.
34. Martin M.D., Mendelson T.C. Signal divergence is correlated with genetic distance and not environmental differences in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolutionary Biology 2012, 39:231-241. 10.1007/s11692-012-9179-2.
35. Martin M.D., Mendelson T.C. Incomplete behavioural isolation and asymmetric female preference in darter sister species (Percidae: Etheostoma). Journal of Fish Biology 2013, 83(5):1371-1380. 10.1111/jfb.12239.
36. Martin M.D., Mendelson T.C. Changes in sexual signals are greater than changes in ecological traits in a dichromatic group of fishes. Evolution 2014, 68(12):3618-3628. 10.1111/evo.12509.
37. McKinnon J.S., Hamele N., Frey N., Chou J., McAleavey L., Greene J., et al. Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex. PLoS One 2012, 7:e37951. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037951.
38. McLennan D.A., Ryan M.J. Responses to conspecific and heterospecific olfactory cues in the swordtail Xiphophorus cortezi. Animal Behaviour 1997, 54:1077-1088. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0504.
39. Mendelson T.C. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 2003, 57:317-327.
40. Mendelson T.C., Wong M.K. AFLP phylogeny of the snubnose darters and allies (Percidae: Etheostoma) provides resolution across multiple levels of divergence. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2010, 57:1253-1259. 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.10.007.
41. Moodie G.E.E. Predation, natural selection and adaptation in an unusual threespine stickleback. Heredity 1972, 28:155-167.
42. Moran R.L., von Ende C.N., King B.H. Mate choice copying in two species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Behaviour 2013, 150(11):1255-1274. 10.1163/1568539X-00003092.
43. Ninnes C.E., Andersson S. Male receiver bias for red agonistic signalling in a yellow-signalling widowbird: a field experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2014, 281:20140971. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0971.
44. O'Rourke C.F., Mendelson T.C. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus). Behavioural Processes 2010, 85:157-162. 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.005.
45. O'Rourke C.F., Mendelson T.C. Behavioural responses to season and adult sex ratio in the fantail darter Etheostoma flabellare. Animal Behaviour 2013, 85:43-49. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.004.
46. O'Rourke C.F., Mendelson T.C. The fitness consequences of plastic responses to adult sex ratio in a paternal care fish. Animal Behaviour 2014, 87:77-83. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.012.
47. Olsson M. Nuptial coloration and predation risk in model sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Animal Behaviour 1993, 46:410-412. 10.1006/anbe.1993.1207.
48. Ortiz-Barrientos D., Grealy A., Nosil P. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1168:156-182. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04919.x.
49. Page L.M., Burr B. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes 2011, Houghton Mifflin, New York, NY. 2nd ed.
50. Panhuis T.M., Butlin R., Zuk M., Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2001, 16:364-371.
51. Persons M.H., Fleishman L.J., Frye M.A., Stimphil M.E. Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 1999, 184:585-607. 10.1007/s003590050358.
52. Pfennig K.S., Rice A.M. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2014, 281(1789):20140949. 10.1098/rspb.2014.0949.
53. Pfennig K.S., Ryan M.J. Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273:1361-1368.
54. Porter B.A., Fiumera A.C., Avise J.C. Egg mimicry and allopaternal care: two mate-attracting tactics by which nesting striped darter (Etheostoma virgatum) males enhance reproductive success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2002, 51:350-359. 10.1007/s00265-002-0456-4.
55. Pyron M. Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1995, 36(6):407-412.
56. Qvarnström A., Vallin N., Rudh A. The role of male contest competition over mates in speciation. Current Zoology 2012, 58:493-509.
57. R Core Development Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
58. Seddon N. Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in Neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 2005, 59:200-215. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00906.x.
59. Seehausen O., Schluter D. Male-male competition and nuptial-colour displacement as a diversifying force in Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2004, 271:1345-1353.
60. Smith R.J.F. Alarm reaction of Iowa and johnny darters (Etheostoma, Percidae, Pisces) to chemicals from injured conspecifics. Canadian Journal of Zoology 1979, 57:1278-1282. 10.1139/z79-164.
61. Stalker H.D. Sexual isolation studies in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 1942, 27:238-257.
62. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1972, 136-179. Aldine, Chicago, IL. B.G. Campbell (Ed.).
63. Vallin N., Rice A.M., Bailey R.I., Husby A., Qvarnström A. Positive feedback between ecological and reproductive character displacement in a young avian hybrid zone. Evolution 2012, 66:1167-1179. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01518.x.
64. Weddle G.K., Burr B.M. Fecundity and the dynamics of multiple spawning in darters: an in-stream study of Etheostoma rafinesquei. Copeia 1991, 1991:419-433.
65. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology 1983, 58:155-183.
66. Williams T.H., Gumm J.M., Mendelson T.C. Sexual selection acting on a speciation trait in darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Behavioral Ecology 2013, 24:1407-1414.
67. Williams T.H., Mendelson T.C. Behavioral isolation based on visual signals in a sympatric pair of darter species. Ethology 2010, 116:1038-1049.
68. Williams T.H., Mendelson T.C. Female preference for male coloration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. Animal Behaviour 2011, 82:683-689. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.06.023.
69. Wong B.B.M., Candolin U. How is female mate choice affected by male competition?. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2005, 80:559-571. 10.1017/S1464793105006809.
70. Zhou M., Loew E.R., Fuller R.C. Sexually asymmetric colour-based species discrimination in orangethroat darters. Animal Behaviour 2015, 106:171-179. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.05.016.