Male association preference for conspecifics in the redband darter, Etheostoma luteovinctum (Teleostei: Percidae) based on visual cues

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 1, 2013, Pages 154-159

  Ciccotto, Patrick J ^a   Gumm, Jennifer M ^b   Mendelson, Tamra C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BODY SHAPE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MALE; PERCID; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SPAWNING; VISUAL CUE;

ANHINGIDAE; ETHEOSTOMA; ETHEOSTOMA HOPKINSI; ETHEOSTOMA LUTEOVINCTUM; PERCIDAE; PISCES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 84876391369     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CE-12-056     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and D. Schluter. 2004. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: Reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58: 1099-1107.
2. Amundsen, T., and E. Forsgren. 2001. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:13155-13160.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
4. Aspbury, A. S., and A. L. Basolo. 2002. Repeatable female preferences, mating order and mating success in the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosa. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:238-244.
5. Aspbury, A. S., and C. R. Gabor. 2004. Discriminating males alter sperm production between species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:15970-15973.
6. Basolo, A. L. 2004. Variation between and within the sexes in body size preferences. Animal Behaviour 68:75-82.
7. Basolo, A. L., and B. C. Trainor. 2002. The conformation of a female preference for a composite male trait in green swordtails. Animal Behaviour 63:469-474.
8. Bizazza, A., G. Vaccari, and A. Pilastro. 2000. Female mate choice in a mating system dominated by male coercion. Behavioral Ecology 12:59-64.
9. Blumstein, D. T., C. S. Evans, and J. C. Daniels. 2000. JWatcher 1.0. http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu/. Accessed February 2011.
10. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Female guppies agree to differ: Phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55:1644-1655.
11. Couldridge, V. C. K., and G. J. Alexander. 2002. Color patterns and species recognition in four closely related species of Lake Malawi cichlid. Behavioral Ecology 13:59-64.
12. Coyne, J. A., A. P. Crittenden, and K. Mah. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.
13. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts. Crapon de Caprona, M. D., and M. J. Ryan. 1990. Conspecific mate recognition in swordtails, Xiphophorus nigrensis and X. pigmaeus (Poeciliidae): Olfactory and visual cues. Animal Behaviour 39:290-296.
14. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
15. Edward, D. A., and T. Chapman. 2011. The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:647-654.
16. Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223.
17. Espinedo, C. M., C. R. Gabor, and A. S. Aspbury. 2010. Males, but not females, contribute to sexual isolation between two sympatric species of Gambusia. Evolutionary Ecology 24:865-878.
18. Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The Fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.
19. Fuller, R. C. 2003. Disentangling female mate choice and male competition in the Rainbow Darter, Etheostoma caeruleum. Copeia 2003:138-148.
20. Hankison, S. J., and M. R. Morris. 2003. Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: Female swordtail fish assess multiple speciesspecific cues. Behavioral Ecology 14:282-287.
21. Houde, A. E. 1987. Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1-10.
22. Jeswiet, S. B., and J. J. Godin. 2011. Validation of a method for quantifying male mating preferences in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ethology 117:422-429.
23. Johnston, C. E., and D. L. Johnson. 2000. Sound production during the spawning season in cavity-nesting darters of the subgenus Catonotus (Percidae: Etheostoma). Copeia 2000:475-481.
24. Kodric-Brown, A., and U. Strecker. 2001. Responses of Cyprinodon maya and C. labiosus females to visual and olfactory cues of conspecific and heterospecific males. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 73:541-548.
25. Kozak, G. M., M. Reisland, and J. W. Boughmann. 2009. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Evolution 63:353-365.
26. Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
27. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78:3721-3725.
28. Lang, N. J., and R. L. Mayden. 2007. Systematics of the subgenus Oligocephalus (Teleostei: Percidae: Etheostoma) with complete subgeneric sampling of the genus Etheostoma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43:605-615.
29. Lehtonen, T. K., and K. Lindström. 2008. Repeatability of mating preferences in the sand goby. Animal Behaviour 75:55-61.
30. Marcy, B. C., Jr., D. E. Fletcher, F. D. Martin, M. H. Paller, and M. J. M. Reichert. 2005. Fishes of the Middle Savannah River Basin; with emphasis on the Savannah River site. The University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.
31. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
32. McLennan, D. A. 1995. Male mate choice based upon female nuptial coloration in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Animal Behaviour 50:213-221.
33. Mendelson, T. C. 2003. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57: 317-327.
34. Mendelson, T. C., V. E. Imhoff, and J. J. Venditti. 2007. The accumulation of reproductive barriers during speciation: Postmating barriers in two behaviorally isolated species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 61: 2596-2606.
35. Near, T. J., C. M. Bossu, G. S. Bradburd, R. L. Carlson, R. C. Harrington, P. R. Hollingsworth, Jr., B. P. Keck, and D. A. Etnier. 2011. Phylogeny and temporal diversification of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Systematic Biology 60:565-595.
36. O"Rourke, C. F., and T. C. Mendelson. 2010. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus). Behavioural Processes 85:157-162.
37. Page, L. M. 1983. Handbook of Darters. TFH Publications, New Jersey.
38. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.
39. Parker, G. A. 1983. Mate quality and mating decisions, p. 141-166. In: Mate Choice. P. Bateson (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
40. Plenderleith, M., C. Van Oosterhout, R. L. Robinson, and G. F. Turner. 2005. Female preferences for conspecific males based on olfactory cues in a Lake Malawi cichlid fish. Biology Letters 1:411-414.
41. Ptacek, M. B. 2000. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behavioural Processes 51:111-134.
42. Pyron, M. 1995. Mating patterns and a test for female mate choice in Etheostoma spectabile (Pisces, Percidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36:407-412.
43. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
44. Seehausen, O., J. J. M. Van Alphen, and R. Lande. 1999. Color polymorphism and sex-ratio distortion in a cichlid fish as a transient stage in sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Ecology Letters 2:367-378.
45. Speares, P., D. Holt, and C. Johnston. 2011. The relationship between ambient noise and dominant frequency of vocalizations in two species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Environmental Biology of Fishes 90:103-110.
46. Svensson, E. I., K. Karlsson, M. Friberg, and F. Eroukhmanoff. 2007. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Current Biology 17:1943-1947.
47. Trivers, R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection, p. 136-179. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. B. Campbell (ed.). Aldine Press, Chicago.
48. Wagner, W. E., Jr. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Animal Behaviour 55:1029-1042.
49. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Quarterly Review of Biology 58: 155-183.
50. Williams, T. H., and T. C. Mendelson. 2010. Behavioral isolation based on visual cues in a sympatric pair of darter species. Ethology 116:1038-1049.
51. Williams, T. H., and T. C. Mendelson. 2011. Female preference for male coloration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. Animal Behaviour 82: 683-689.
52. Wong, B. B. M., H. S. Fisher, and G. G. Rosenthal. 2005. Species recognition by male swordtails via chemical cues. Behavioral Ecology 16:818-822.
53. Wong, B. B. M., J. S. Keogh, and M. D. Jennions. 2004. Mate recognition in a freshwater fish: Geographical distance, genetic differentiation, and variation in female preference for local over foreign males. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17:701-708.