Mate choice copying in two species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma)

Behaviour

Volumn 150, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1255-1274

  King, Bethia H ^a   Moran, Rachel L ^a   Von Ende, Carl N ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

darters; Etheostoma flabellare; Etheostoma zonale; mate choice copying; non independent mate choice; sexual selection; social learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893146156     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003092     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alho, J.S., Teplitsky, C., Mills, J.A., Yarrall, J.W. & Merila, J. (2012). No evidence for inbreeding avoidance through active mate choice in red-billed gulls. - Behav. Ecol. 23: 672-675.
2. Alonzo, S.H. (2008). Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse. - Anim. Behav. 75: 1715-1723.
3. Amundsen, T. (2003). Fishes as models in studies of sexual selection and parental care. - J. Fish. Biol. 63: 17-52.
4. Bierbach, D., Kronmarck, C., Hennige-Schulz, C., Stadler, S. & Plath, M. (2011). Sperm competition risk affects male mate choice copying. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65: 1699-1707.
5. Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. & White, J.S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. - Trends Evol. Ecol. 24: 127-135.
6. Bonnie, K.E. & Earley, R.L. (2007). Expanding the scope for social information use. - Anim. Behav. 74: 171-181.
7. Constantz, G.D. (1985). Allopaternal care in the tessellated darter, Etheostoma olmstedi (Pisces: Percidae). - Environ. Biol. Fish. 14: 175-183.
8. Dosen, L.D. & Montgomerie, R. (2004). Female size influences mate preferences of male guppies. - Ethology 110: 245-255.
9. Dugatkin, L.A. (1992). Sexual selection and imitation: Females copy the mate choice of others. - Am. Nat. 139: 1384-1389.
10. Dugatkin, L.A. (1996). The interface between culturally-based preferences and genetic preferences: Female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 2770-2773.
11. Dugatkin, L.A. (1998). Genes, copying, and female mate choice: Shifting thresholds. - Behav. Ecol. 9: 323-327.
12. Dugatkin, L.A. (2005). Mistakes and the evolution of copying. - Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 17: 327-333.
13. Eens, M. & Pinxten, R. (2000). Sex-role reversal in vertebrates: Behavioural and endocrinological accounts. - Behav. Process. 51: 135-147.
14. Fisher, R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. - Oxford University Press, Oxford.
15. Forsgren, E., Karlsson, A. & Kvarnemo, C. (1996). Female sand gobies gain direct benefits by choosing males with eggs in their nests. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 91-96.
16. Fowler-Finn, K.D. & Hebets, E.A. (2011). More ornamented males exhibit increased predation risk and antipredatory escapes, but not greater mortality. - Ethology 117: 102-114.
17. Frommen, J.G., Rahn, A.K., Schroth, S.H., Waltschyk, N. & Bakker, T.C.M. (2009). Matechoice copying when both sexes face high costs of reproduction. - Evol. Ecol. 23: 435-446.
18. Fuller, R.C. (2003). Disentangling female mate choice and male competition in the rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum. - Copeia 2003: 138-148.
19. Galef, B.G. (2008). Social influences on the mate choices of male and female Japanese quail. - Comp. Cogn. Behav. Rev. 3: 1-12.
20. Goldschmidt, T., Bakker, T.C.M. & Feuth-De Bruijn, E. (1993). Selective copying in mate choice of female sticklebacks. - Anim. Behav. 45: 541-547.
21. Goncalves, D.M. & Oliveira, R.F. (2003). Time spent close to a sexual partner as a measure of female mate preference in a sex-role-reversed population of the blenny Salaria pavo (Risso) (Pisces: Blenniidae). - Acta Ethol. 6: 1-5.
22. Goulet, D.&Goulet, T.L. (2006). Nonindependent mating in a coral reef damselfish: Evidence of mate choice copying in the wild. - Behav. Ecol. 17: 998-1003.
23. Gumm, J.M. & Mendelson, T.C. (2011). The evolution of multi-component visual signals in darters (genus Etheostoma). - Curr. Zool. 57: 125-139.
24. Gumm, J.M., Feller, K.D. & Mendelson, T.C. (2011). Spectral characteristics of male nuptial coloration in darters (Etheostoma). - Copeia 2011: 31-326.
25. Hoysak, D.J. & Godin, J.-G.J. (2007). Repeatability of male mate choice in the mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki. - Ethology 113: 1007-1018.
26. Jamieson, I.G. & Colgan, P.W. (1989). Eggs in the nests of males and their effect on mate choice in the three-spined stickleback. - Anim. Behav. 38: 859-865.
27. Jones, A.G. & Ratterman, N.L. (2009). Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(Suppl.): 10001-10008.
28. Kokko, H. & Johnstone, R.A. (2002). Why is mutual mate choice not the norm Operational sex ratios, sex roles, and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. - Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 357: 319-330.
29. Knapp, R.A. & Sargent, R.C. (1989). Egg-mimicry as a mating strategy in the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare: Females prefer males with eggs. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 321-326.
30. Kraak, S.B.M. & Groothuis, T.G.G. (1994). Female preference for nests with eggs is based on the presence of the eggs themselves. - Behaviour 131: 189-206.
31. Laland, K.N., Atton, N. & Webster, M.M. (2011). From fish to fashion: Experimental and theoretical insights into the evolution of culture. - Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 366: 958-968.
32. Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
33. Lee, Y., Nelder, J.A. & Pawitan, Y. (2006). Generalised linear models with random effects: Unified analysis via h-likelihood. - Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
34. Lill, A. (1974). Sexual Behaviour of the lek-forming white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus trinitatis Hartert). - Z. Tierpsychol. 36: 1-36.
35. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. - Chapman & Hall, London.
36. Mendelson, T.C. (2003). Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). - Evolution 57: 317-327.
37. Moretz, J.A. & Rogers,W. (2004). An ethological analysis of breeding behavior of the fantail darter, Etheostoma flabellare. - Am. Midl. Nat. 152: 140-144.
38. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., Vining, G.G. & Robinson, T.J. (2010). Generalized linear models, with applications in engineering and science. - Wiley, New York, NY, p. 496.
39. O'Rourke, C.F. & Mendelson, T.C. (2010). Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus). - Behav. Process. 85: 157-162.
40. Page, L.M. & Burr, B.M. (2011). A field guide to the freshwater fishes of North America North of Mexico. - Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.
41. Page, L.M. & Swofford, D.L. (1984). Morphological correlates of ecological specialization in darters. - Environ. Biol. Fish. 11: 139-159.
42. Patriquin-Meldrum, K.J. & Godin, J.G.J. (1998). Do female three-spined sticklebacks copy the mate choice of others - Am. Nat. 151: 570-577.
43. Plath, M., Makowicz, A.M., Schlupp, I. & Toblera, M. (2007). Sexual harassment in livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae): Comparing courting and noncourting species. - Behav. Ecol. 18: 680-688.
44. Pomiankowski, A. (1987). The costs of choice in sexual selection. - J. Theor. Biol. 128: 195-218.
45. Pruett-Jones, S.G. (1992). Independent versus non-independent mate choice: Do females copy each other - Am. Nat. 140: 1000-1009.
46. Ridley, M. & Rechten, C. (1981). Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. - Behaviour 76: 152-161.
47. Rung, R.C. & Pescitelli, S.M. (2004). Biological surveys of Big Rock Creek and tributaries: August, 2002 and July, 2003. - Illinois Department of Natural Resources' Region II Streams Office, Bartlett, IL.
48. Schlupp, I. & Ryan, M.J. (1997). Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. - Behav. Ecol. 8: 104-107.
49. Stiver, K.A. & Alonzo, S.H. (2010). Large males have a mating advantage in a species of darter with smaller, allopaternal males Etheostoma olmstedi. - Curr. Zool. 56: 1-5.
50. Stiver, K.A. & Alonzo, S.H. (2011). Alloparental care increases mating success. - Behav. Ecol. 22: 206-211.
51. Swanbrow Becker, L.J. & Gabor, C.R. (2012). Effects of turbidity and visual vs. chemical cues on anti-predator response in the endangered fountain darter (Etheostoma fonticola). - Ethology 118: 994-1000.
52. Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. - In: Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (Campbell, B., ed.). Aldine Press, Chicago, IL, p. 136-179.
53. Vakirtzis, A. (2011).Mate choice copying and nonindependent mate choice: A critical review. - Ann. Zool. Fennici 48: 91-107.
54. Watson, K.K., Ghodasra, J., Furlong, M.A. & Platt, M.L. (2012). Visual preferences for sex and status in female rhesus macaques. - Anim. Cogn. 15: 401-407.
55. Webb, P.W. (1980). Does schooling reduce fast-start response latencies in teleosts - Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 65A: 231-234.
56. Westneat, D.F., Walters, A., McCarthy, T.M., Hatch, M.I. & Hein, W.K. (2000). Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. - Anim. Behav. 59: 467-476.
57. Widemo, M.S. (2006). Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice. - Behav. Ecol. 17: 255-259.
58. Wiley, R.H. (1973). Territoriality and non-random mating in sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus. - Anim. Behav. Monogr. 6: 87-169.
59. Williams, T.H. & Mendelson, T.C. (2010). Behavioural isolation based on visual signals in a sympatric pair of darter species. - Ethology 116: 1038-1049.
60. Williams, T.H.&Mendelson, T.C. (2011). Female preference for male coloration may explain behavioural isolation in sympatric darters. - Anim. Behav. 82: 683-689.
61. Winn, H.E. (1958). Observation on the reproductive habits of darters (Pisces-Percidae). - Am. Midl. Nat. 59: 190-212.
62. Witte, K. (2006). Learning and mate choice. - In: Fish cognition and behaviour (Brown, C., Laland, K. & Krause, J., eds). Blackwell, Oxford, p. 70-95.
63. Witte, K. & Massman, R. (2003). Female sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna, remember males and copy the choice of others after 1 day. - Anim. Behav. 65: 1151-1159.
64. Witte, K. & Ryan, M.J. (1998). Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna. - Behav. Ecol. 9: 534-539.
65. Zoller, C. (1999). Fooling fish with light. - Am. Curr. 25: 9-11.