Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  McKinnon, Jeffrey S ^a   Hamele, Nick ^b   Frey, Nicole ^b   Chou, Jennifer ^b   McAleavey, Leia ^b   Greene, Jess ^b   Paulson, Windi ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; COURTSHIP; ECOTYPE; FEMALE; FISH; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES COMPARISON; STREAM (RIVER); ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; JAPAN; PHYSIOLOGY; SMEGMAMORPHA; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; BRITISH COLUMBIA; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; JAPAN; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SMEGMAMORPHA;

EID: 84862196876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037951     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Schluter D, (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
2. Coyne JA, Orr HA, (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
3. Rundle HD, Nosil P, (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8: 336 352.
4. Gray SM, McKinnon JS, (2007) Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 71 79.
5. Hendry AP, (2009) Ecological speciation! Or the lack thereof? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66: 1383 1398.
6. McKinnon JS, Pierotti MER, (2010) Colour polymorphism and correlated characters: genetic mechanisms and evolution. Mol Ecol 19: 5101 5125.
7. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P, (2011) Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? Trends Ecol Evol 26: 389 397.
8. Servedio MR, Lande R, (2006) Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice. Evolution 60: 674 685.
9. Rowell JT, Servedio MR, (2009) Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males. Am Nat 173: 12 25.
10. Edward DA, Chapman T, (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 647 654.
11. Baube CL, (2008) Body size and the maintenance of reproductive isolation in stickleback, genus Gasterosteus. Ethology 114: 1122 1134.
12. Delcourt M, Rasanen K, Hendry AP, (2008) Genetic and plastic components of divergent male intersexual behavior in Misty lake/stream stickleback. Behav Ecol 19: 1217 1224.
13. Rick IP, Bakker TCM, (2008) UV wavelengths make female three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) more attractive for males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62: 439 445.
14. Kozak GM, Reisland M, Boughman JW, (2009) Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice. Evolution 63: 353 365.
15. Raeymaekers JAM, Boisjoly M, Delaire L, Berner D, Rasanen K, (2010) Testing for mating isolation between ecotypes: laboratory experiments with lake, stream and hybrid stickleback. J Evol Biol 23: 2694 2708.
16. Trivers RL, (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editors. pp. 136 179 editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971. Chicago: Aldine.
17. Bell MA, Foster SA, editors (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. McPhail JD, (1994) Speciation and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the sticklebacks (Gasterosteus) of southwestern British Columbia. In: Bell MA, Foster SA, editors. pp. 399 437 editors. The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. McKinnon JS, Rundle HD, (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 480 488.
20. Boughman JW, (2007) Divergence and speciation in sticklebacks. In: Ostlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA, editors. pp. 83 126 editors. The biology of the threespine stickleback. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
21. Hendry AP, Bolnick DI, Berner D, Peichel CL, (2009) Along the speciation continuum in sticklebacks. J Fish Biol 75: 2000 2036.
22. Ostlund-Nilsson S, Mayer I, Huntingford FA, editors (2007) Biology of the three-spined stickleback. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
23. Hagen DW, (1967) Isolating mechanisms in threespine sticklebacks sticklebacks (Gasterosteus). J Fish Res Bd Can 24: 1637 1692.
24. Jones FC, Brown C, Pemberton JM, Braithwaite VA, (2006) Reproductive isolation in a threespine stickleback hybrid zone. J Evol Biol 19: 1531 1544.
25. Jones FC, Brown C, Braithwaite VA, (2008) Lack of assortative mating between incipient species of stickleback from a hybrid zone. Behaviour 145: 463 484.
26. Karve AJ, von Hippel FA, Bell MA, (2008) Isolation between sympatric anadromous and resident threespine stickleback species in Mud Lake, Alaska. Environm Biol Fish 81: 287 296.
27. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsley DM, (2004) Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429: 294 298.
28. Rundle HD, Schluter D, (1998) Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sSympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200 208.
29. Albert AYK, Schluter D, (2004) Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: Reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58: 1099 1107.
30. Wooton (1976) Biology of the Sticklebacks. London: Academic Press.
31. Rice WR, Gaines SD, (1994) The ordered-heterogeneity family of tests. Biometrics 50: 746 752.
32. Albert AYK, (2005) Mate choice, sexual imprinting, and speciation: A test of a one-allele isolating mechanism in sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 59: 927 931.
33. Kozak GM, Head ML, Boughman JW, (2011) Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278: 2604 2610.
34. Sargent RC, Gross MR, Vandenberghe EP, (1986) Male mate choice in fishes. Anim Behav 34: 545 550.
35. Rowland WJ, (1989) The ethological basis of mate choice in male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 38: 112 120.
36. McPhail JD, Hay DE, (1983) Differences in male courtship in fresh-water and marine male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Can J Zool 61: 292 297.
37. Head ML, Price EA, Boughman JW, (2009) Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback. Biol Lett 5: 517 520.
38. Borland MA, (1986) Size-assortative mating in threespine sticklebacks from two sites on the Salmon River, British Columbia [M.Sc.]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
39. Foster SA, Shaw KA, Robert KL, Baker JA, (2008) Benthic, limnetic and oceanic threespine stickleback: profiles of reproductive behaviour. Behaviour 145: 485 508.
40. Gow JL, Peichel CL, Taylor EB, (2007) Ecological selection against hybrids in natural populations of sympatric threespine sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 20: 2173 2180.
41. Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Etter PD, Stiffler N, Johnson EA, (2010) Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags. PLoS Genet 6: e1000862.
42. Schluter D, Marchinko KB, Barrett RD, Rogers SM, (2010) Natural selection and the genetics of adaptation in threespine stickleback. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 2479 2486.
43. Kozak GM, Boughman JW, (2009) Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks. Behav Ecol 20: 1282 1288.