Conformational Selection in a Protein-Protein Interaction Revealed by Dynamic Pathway Analysis

Cell Reports

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 32-42

  Chakrabarti, Kalyan S ^a,d   Agafonov, Roman V ^a   Pontiggia, Francesco ^a   Otten, Renee ^a   Higgins, Matthew K ^b   Schertler, Gebhard F X ^c   Oprian, Daniel D ^a   Kern, Dorothee ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conformational ensemble; Conformational selection; Energy landscape; Molecular recognition dynamics; Protein protein interaction; Recoverin

Indexed keywords

RECOVERIN; RHODOPSIN KINASE; PROTEIN BINDING; RCVRN PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; BINDING SITE; HYDROPHOBICITY; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATIONAL SELECTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STOPPED FLOW KINETICS; CHEMISTRY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 1; HUMANS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; RECOVERIN;

EID: 84952978925     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agafonov R.V., Wilson C., Otten R., Buosi V., Kern D. Energetic dissection of Gleevec's selectivity toward human tyrosine kinases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:848-853.
2. Al-Hashimi H.M. NMR studies of nucleic acid dynamics. J. Magn. Reson. 2013, 237:191-204.
3. Ames J.B., Tanaka T., Stryer L., Ikura M. Secondary structure of myristoylated recoverin determined by three-dimensional heteronuclear NMR: implications for the calcium-myristoyl switch. Biochemistry 1994, 33:10743-10753.
4. Ames J.B., Tanaka T., Ikura M., Stryer L. Nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for Ca(2+)-induced extrusion of the myristoyl group of recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:30909-30913.
5. Ames J.B., Ishima R., Tanaka T., Gordon J.I., Stryer L., Ikura M. Molecular mechanics of calcium-myristoyl switches. Nature 1997, 389:198-202.
6. Ames J.B., Levay K., Wingard J.N., Lusin J.D., Slepak V.Z. Structural basis for calcium-induced inhibition of rhodopsin kinase by recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:37237-37245.
7. Baker B.M., Murphy K.P. Dissecting the energetics of a protein-protein interaction: the binding of ovomucoid third domain to elastase. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 268:557-569.
8. Bezsonova I., Bruce M.C., Wiesner S., Lin H., Rotin D., Forman-Kay J.D. Interactions between the three CIN85 SH3 domains and ubiquitin: implications for CIN85 ubiquitination. Biochemistry 2008, 47:8937-8949.
9. Boehr D.D., McElheny D., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science 2006, 313:1638-1642.
10. Boehr D.D., Nussinov R., Wright P.E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:789-796.
11. Bouvignies G., Vallurupalli P., Hansen D.F., Correia B.E., Lange O., Bah A., Vernon R.M., Dahlquist F.W., Baker D., Kay L.E. Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant. Nature 2011, 477:111-114.
12. Burgoyne R.D., Weiss J.L. The neuronal calcium sensor family of Ca2+-binding proteins. Biochem. J. 2001, 353:1-12.
13. Carver J.P., Richards R.E. General 2-site solution for chemical exchange produced dependence of T2 upon Carr-Purcell pulse separation. J. Magn. Reson. 1972, 6:89-96.
14. Cavanagh J., Fairbrother W.J., Palmer A.G., Skelton N.J. Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice 1995, Elsevier Science.
15. Changeux J.P., Edelstein S. Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved. F1000 Biol. Rep. 2011, 3:19.
16. Chen C.K., Inglese J., Lefkowitz R.J., Hurley J.B. Ca(2+)-dependent interaction of recoverin with rhodopsin kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:18060-18066.
17. Clore G.M. Interplay between conformational selection and induced fit in multidomain protein-ligand binding probed by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:3-12.
18. Copeland R.A. Conformational adaptation in drug-target interactions and residence time. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 3:1491-1501.
19. Cornish-Bowden A. Understanding allosteric and cooperative interactions in enzymes. FEBS J. 2014, 281:621-632.
20. Daniels K.G., Tonthat N.K., McClure D.R., Chang Y.C., Liu X., Schumacher M.A., Fierke C.A., Schmidler S.C., Oas T.G. Ligand concentration regulates the pathways of coupled protein folding and binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136:822-825.
21. Datta K., LiCata V.J. Thermodynamics of the binding of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase to primed-template DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:5590-5597.
22. Davis D.G., Perlman M.E., London R.E. Direct measurements of the dissociation-rate constant for inhibitor-enzyme complexes via the T1 rho and T2 (CPMG) methods. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1994, 104:266-275.
23. Delaglio F., Grzesiek S., Vuister G.W., Zhu G., Pfeifer J., Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 6:277-293.
24. Di Cera E. Special issue on conformational selection. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:1-2.
25. Feixas F., Lindert S., Sinko W., McCammon J.A. Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:31-45.
26. Fenwick R.B., Esteban-Martín S., Richter B., Lee D., Walter K.F., Milovanovic D., Becker S., Lakomek N.A., Griesinger C., Salvatella X. Weak long-range correlated motions in a surface patch of ubiquitin involved in molecular recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133:10336-10339.
27. Fersht A. Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding 1999, W.H. Freeman.
28. Foote J., Milstein C. Conformational isomerism and the diversity of antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:10370-10374.
29. Gill S.J., Wadsö I. An equation of state describing hydrophobic interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73:2955-2958.
30. Greives N., Zhou H.X. Both protein dynamics and ligand concentration can shift the binding mechanism between conformational selection and induced fit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:10197-10202.
31. Grishaev A., Guo L., Irving T., Bax A. Improved fitting of solution X-ray scattering data to macromolecular structures and structural ensembles by explicit water modeling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132:15484-15486.
32. Hammes G.G., Chang Y.C., Oas T.G. Conformational selection or induced fit: a flux description of reaction mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:13737-13741.
33. Hatzakis N.S. Single molecule insights on conformational selection and induced fit mechanism. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:46-54.
34. Henzler-Wildman K., Kern D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 2007, 450:964-972.
35. Higgins M.K., Oprian D.D., Schertler G.F. Recoverin binds exclusively to an amphipathic peptide at the N terminus of rhodopsin kinase, inhibiting rhodopsin phosphorylation without affecting catalytic activity of the kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:19426-19432.
36. James L.C., Tawfik D.S. Structure and kinetics of a transient antibody binding intermediate reveal a kinetic discrimination mechanism in antigen recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:12730-12735.
37. James L.C., Roversi P., Tawfik D.S. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 2003, 299:1362-1367.
38. Jen J. Chemical exchange and Nmr T2 relaxation- multisite case. J. Magn. Reson. 1978, 30:111-128.
39. Johnson B.A. Using NMRView to visualize and analyze the NMR spectra of macromolecules. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 278:313-352.
40. Johnson K.A. Fitting enzyme kinetic data with KinTek Global Kinetic Explorer. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 467:601-626.
41. Johnson K.A., Simpson Z.B., Blom T. Global kinetic explorer: a new computer program for dynamic simulation and fitting of kinetic data. Anal. Biochem. 2009, 387:20-29.
42. Klenchin V.A., Calvert P.D., Bownds M.D. Inhibition of rhodopsin kinase by recoverin. Further evidence for a negative feedback system in phototransduction. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:16147-16152.
43. Korzhnev D.M., Salvatella X., Vendruscolo M., Di Nardo A.A., Davidson A.R., Dobson C.M., Kay L.E. Low-populated folding intermediates of Fyn SH3 characterized by relaxation dispersion NMR. Nature 2004, 430:586-590.
44. Korzhnev D.M., Bezsonova I., Lee S., Chalikian T.V., Kay L.E. Alternate binding modes for a ubiquitin-SH3 domain interaction studied by NMR spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386:391-405.
45. Koshland D.E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1958, 44:98-104.
46. Lakowicz J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy 2007, Springer. Third Edition.
47. Lancet D., Pecht I. Kinetic evidence for hapten-induced conformational transition in immunoglobin MOPC 460. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73:3549-3553.
48. Lange O.F., Lakomek N.A., Farès C., Schröder G.F., Walter K.F., Becker S., Meiler J., Grubmüller H., Griesinger C., de Groot B.L. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 2008, 320:1471-1475.
49. Loria J.P., Rance M., Palmer A.G. Transverse-relaxation-optimized (TROSY) gradient-enhanced triple-resonance NMR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 1999, 141:180-184.
50. Loria J.P., Rance M., Palmer A.G. A TROSY CPMG sequence for characterizing chemical exchange in large proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 1999, 15:151-155.
51. Maltsev A.S., Grishaev A., Roche J., Zasloff M., Bax A. Improved cross validation of a static ubiquitin structure derived from high precision residual dipolar couplings measured in a drug-based liquid crystalline phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136:3752-3755.
52. Matulis D. Thermodynamics of the hydrophobic effect. III. Condensation and aggregation of alkanes, alcohols, and alkylamines. Biophys. Chem. 2001, 93:67-82.
53. Michielssens S., Peters J.H., Ban D., Pratihar S., Seeliger D., Sharma M., Giller K., Sabo T.M., Becker S., Lee D., et al. A designed conformational shift to control protein binding specificity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53:10367-10371.
54. Monod J., Wyman J., Changeux J.P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 1965, 12:88-118.
55. Mulder F.A., Skrynnikov N.R., Hon B., Dahlquist F.W., Kay L.E. Measurement of slow (micros-ms) time scale dynamics in protein side chains by (15)N relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: application to Asn and Gln residues in a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123:967-975.
56. Nussinov R., Ma B., Tsai C.J. Multiple conformational selection and induced fit events take place in allosteric propagation. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:22-30.
57. Palczewski K., Buczyłko J., Lebioda L., Crabb J.W., Polans A.S. Identification of the N-terminal region in rhodopsin kinase involved in its interaction with rhodopsin. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268:6004-6013.
58. Palmer A.G. NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104:3623-3640.
59. Palmer A.G. Chemical exchange in biomacromolecules: past, present, and future. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 241:3-17.
60. Palmer A.G., Kroenke C.D., Loria J.P. Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for quantifying microsecond-to-millisecond motions in biological macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 339:204-238.
61. Phillips A.H., Zhang Y., Cunningham C.N., Zhou L., Forrest W.F., Liu P.S., Steffek M., Lee J., Tam C., Helgason E., et al. Conformational dynamics control ubiquitin-deubiquitinase interactions and influence in vivo signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:11379-11384.
62. Ranaghan M.J., Kumar R.P., Chakrabarti K.S., Buosi V., Kern D., Oprian D.D. A highly conserved cysteine of neuronal calcium-sensing proteins controls cooperative binding of Ca2+ to recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:36160-36167.
63. Singh P., Wang B., Maeda T., Palczewski K., Tesmer J.J. Structures of rhodopsin kinase in different ligand states reveal key elements involved in G protein-coupled receptor kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:14053-14062.
64. Skrynnikov N.R., Dahlquist F.W., Kay L.E. Reconstructing NMR spectra of "invisible" excited protein states using HSQC and HMQC experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124:12352-12360.
65. Strickland S., Palmer G., Massey V. Determination of dissociation constants and specific rate constants of enzyme-substrate (or protein-ligand) interactions from rapid reaction kinetic data. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250:4048-4052.
66. Takeda Y., Ross P.D., Mudd C.P. Thermodynamics of Cro protein-DNA interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89:8180-8184.
67. Tang C., Schwieters C.D., Clore G.M. Open-to-closed transition in apo maltose-binding protein observed by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 2007, 449:1078-1082.
68. Tzeng S.R., Kalodimos C.G. Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein. Nature 2009, 462:368-372.
69. Vogt A.D., Pozzi N., Chen Z., Di Cera E. Essential role of conformational selection in ligand binding. Biophys. Chem. 2014, 186:13-21.
70. Weiergräber O.H., Senin I.I., Philippov P.P., Granzin J., Koch K.W. Impact of N-terminal myristoylation on the Ca2+-dependent conformational transition in recoverin. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:22972-22979.
71. Weikl T.R., Paul F. Conformational selection in protein binding and function. Prot. Sci. 2014, 23:1508-1518.
72. Weiss J.L., Burgoyne R.D. Sense and sensibility in the regulation of voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels. Trends Neurosci. 2002, 25:489-491.
73. Zhou H.X. From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:L15-L17.