Rational design of α-helical tandem repeat proteins with closed architectures

Nature

Volumn 528, Issue 7583, 2015, Pages 585-588

  Doyle, Lindsey ^a   Hallinan, Jazmine ^a   Bolduc, Jill ^a   Parmeggiani, Fabio ^b,c   Baker, David ^b,c   Stoddard, Barry L ^a   Bradley, Philip ^a,c  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; TANDEM REPEAT PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DESIGN METHOD; DNA; ENZYME; GEOMETRY; PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COMPUTER MODEL; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; BIOENGINEERING; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN MOTIF; REPRODUCIBILITY;

SOLENOIDEA;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; BIOENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84951325903     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature16191     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Marcotte, E. M., Pellegrini, M., Yeates, T. O. & Eisenberg, D. A census of protein repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 151-160 (1999).
2. Kajava, A. V. Tandem repeats in proteins: from sequence to structure. J. Struct. Biol. 179, 279-288 (2012).
3. Andrade, M. A., Perez-Iratxeta, C. & Ponting, C. P. Protein repeats: structures, functions, and evolution. J. Struct. Biol. 134, 117-131 (2001).
4. Grove, T. Z., Cortajarena, A. L. & Regan, L. Ligand binding by repeat proteins: natural and designed. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 507-515 (2008).
5. Wang, X., McLachlan, J., Zamore, P. D. & Hall, T. M. Modular recognition of RNA by a human pumilio-homology domain. Cell 110, 501-512 (2002).
6. Mak, A. N., Bradley, P., Cernadas, R. A., Bogdanove, A. J. & Stoddard, B. L. The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 335, 716-719 (2012).
7. Deng, D. et al. Structural basis for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 335, 720-723 (2012).
8. Barkan, A. et al. A combinatorial amino acid code for RNA recognition by pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002910 (2012).
9. Reichen, C., Hansen, S. & Plückthun, A. Modular peptide binding: from a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 185, 147-162 (2014).
10. Wierenga, R. K. The TIM-barrel fold: a versatile framework for efficient enzymes. FEBS Lett. 492, 193-198 (2001).
11. Kobe, B. & Kajava, A. V. When protein folding is simplified to protein coiling: the continuum of solenoid protein structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 509-515 (2000).
12. Main, E. R., Xiong, Y., Cocco, M. J., D'Andrea, L. & Regan, L. Design of stable alpha-helical arrays from an idealized TPR motif. Structure 11, 497-508 (2003).
13. Binz, H. K. et al. High-affinity binders selected from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 575-582 (2004).
14. Parmeggiani, F. et al. Designed armadillo repeat proteins as general peptide-binding scaffolds: consensus design and computational optimization of the hydrophobic core. J. Mol. Biol. 376, 1282-1304 (2008).
15. Urvoas, A. et al. Design, production and molecular structure of a new family of artificial alpha-helicoidal repeat proteins (αRep) based on thermostable HEAT-like repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 404, 307-327 (2010).
16. Boersma, Y. L. & Plückthun, A. DARPins and other repeat protein scaffolds: advances in engineering and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 849-857 (2011).
17. Rämisch, S., Weininger, U., Martinsson, J., Akke, M. & André, I. Computational design of a leucine-rich repeat protein with a predefined geometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17875-17880 (2014).
18. Voet, A. R. et al. Computational design of a self-assembling symmetrical β-propeller protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15102-15107 (2014).
19. Park, K. et al. Control of repeat-protein curvature by computational protein design. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 167-174 (2015).
20. Parmeggiani, F. et al. A general computational approach for repeat protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 563-575 (2015).
21. Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242 (2000).
22. Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 487, 545-574 (2011).
23. Koga, N. et al. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491, 222-227 (2012).
24. Kajander, T., Cortajarena, A. L., Mochrie, S. & Regan, L. Structure and stability of designed TPR protein superhelices: unusual crystal packing and implications for natural TPR proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D 63, 800-811 (2007).
25. Jiménez-Menéndez, N. et al. Human mitochondrial mTERF wraps around DNA through a left-handed superhelical tandem repeat. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 891-893 (2010).
26. Aurora, R. & Rose, G. D. Helix capping. Protein Sci. 7, 21-38 (1998).
27. Wintjens, R. T., Rooman, M. J. & Wodak, S. J. Automatic classification and analysis of alpha alpha-turn motifs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 235-253 (1996).
28. Grove, T. Z., Regan, L. & Cortajarena, A. L. Nanostructured functional films from engineered repeat proteins. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0051 (2013).
29. Lanci, C. J. et al. Computational design of a protein crystal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7304-7309 (2012).
30. Abe, S. & Ueno, T. Design of protein crystals in the development of solid biomaterials. RSC Adv. 5, 21366-21375 (2015).
31. Simons, K. T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E. & Baker, D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 209-225 (1997).
32. Dantas, G. et al. High-resolution structural and thermodynamic analysis of extreme stabilization of human procarboxypeptidase by computational protein design. J. Mol. Biol. 366, 1209-1221 (2007).
33. Holm, L. & Sander, C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 478-480 (1995).
34. Sillitoe, I. et al. CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D376-D381 (2015).
35. Fox, N. K., Brenner, S. E. & Chandonia, J. M. SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins-extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D304-D309 (2014).
36. Cheng, H. et al. ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003926 (2014).
37. Mak, A. N., Lambert, A. R. & Stoddard, B. L. Folding, DNA recognition, and function of GIY-YIG endonucleases: crystal structures of R.Eco29kI. Structure 18, 1321-1331 (2010).
38. Walden, H. Selenium incorporation using recombinant techniques. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 352-357 (2010).
39. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
40. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 (2007).
41. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235-242 (2011).
42. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486-501 (2010).
43. Skubák, P., Murshudov, G. N. & Pannu, N. S. Direct incorporation of experimental phase information in model refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2196-2201 (2004).
44. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213-221 (2010).
45. Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 352-367 (2012).
46. He, J. et al. The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric α-helical rings. Structure 20, 513-521 (2012).