Control of repeat-protein curvature by computational protein design

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 167-174

  Park, Keunwan ^a   Shen, Betty W ^b   Parmeggiani, Fabio ^a   Huang, Po Ssu ^a   Stoddard, Barry L ^b   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEUCINE RICH REPEAT PROTEIN; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; PROTEIN; REPEAT PROTEIN SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; SURFACE PROPERTY; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84926289262     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2938     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Binz, H.K., Amstutz, P. & Pluckthun, A. Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1257-1268 (2005).
2. Skerra, A. Alternative non-antibody scaffolds for molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 295-304 (2007).
3. Gebauer, M. & Skerra, A. Engineered protein scaffolds as next-generation antibody therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 245-255 (2009).
4. Javadi, Y. & Itzhaki, L.S. Tandem-repeat proteins: regularity plus modularity equals design-ability. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 622-631 (2013).
5. Grove, T.Z., Regan, L. & Cortajarena, A.L. Nanostructured functional films from engineered repeat proteins. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130051 (2013).
6. Phillips, J.J., Millership, C. & Main, E.R. Fibrous nanostructures from the self-assembly of designed repeat protein modules. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 51, 13132-13135 (2012).
7. Han, S.H., Lee, M.K. & Lim, Y.B. Bioinspired self-assembled peptide nanofibers with thermostable multivalent α-helices. Biomacromolecules 14, 1594-1599 (2013).
8. Kobe, B. & Kajava, A.V. The leucine-rich repeat as a protein recognition motif. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 725-732 (2001).
9. Enkhbayar, P., Kamiya, M., Osaki, M., Matsumoto, T. & Matsushima, N. Structural principles of leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins. Proteins 54, 394-403 (2004).
10. Kim, H.M. et al. Crystal structure of the TLR4-MD-2 complex with bound endotoxin antagonist Eritoran. Cell 130, 906-917 (2007).
11. Parker, R., Mercedes-Camacho, A. & Grove, T.Z. Consensus design of a NOD receptor leucine rich repeat domain with binding affinity for a muramyl dipeptide, a bacterial cell wall fragment. Protein Sci. 23, 790-800 (2014).
12. Lee, S.C. et al. Design of a binding scaffold based on variable lymphocyte receptors of jawless vertebrates by module engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3299-3304 (2012).
13. Binz, H.K. et al. High-affinity binders selected from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 575-582 (2004).
14. Forrer, P., Stumpp, M.T., Binz, H.K. & Pluckthun, A. A novel strategy to design binding molecules harnessing the modular nature of repeat proteins. FEBS Lett. 539, 2-6 (2003).
15. Grove, T.Z., Cortajarena, A.L. & Regan, L. Ligand binding by repeat proteins: natural and designed. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 507-515 (2008).
16. Main, E.R., Xiong, Y., Cocco, M.J., D'Andrea, L. & Regan, L. Design of stable alpha-helical arrays from an idealized TPR motif. Structure 11, 497-508 (2003).
17. Filipovska, A. & Rackham, O. Modular recognition of nucleic acids by PUF, TALE and PPR proteins. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 699-708 (2012).
18. Reichen, C., Hansen, S. & Pluckthun, A. Modular peptide binding: from a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 185, 147-162 (2014).
19. Mak, A.N., Bradley, P., Cernadas, R.A., Bogdanove, A.J. & Stoddard, B.L. The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 335, 716-719 (2012).
20. Ryou, J.H., Park, K., Lee, J.J., Kim, D. & Kim, H.S. Soluble expression of human glycoprotein Ibα in Escherichia coli through replacement of the N-terminal capping domain. Protein Expr. Purif. 101, 21-27 (2014).
21. Jung, K. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 decoy, TOY, attenuates gram-negative bacterial sepsis. PLoS ONE 4, e7403 (2009).
22. Parmeggiani, F. et al. A general computational approach for repeat protein design. J. Mol. Biol. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.005.
23. Huang, P.S. et al. RosettaRemodel: a generalized framework for flexible backbone protein design. PLoS ONE 6, e24109 (2011).
24. Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735-1742 (2013).
25. Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 487, 545-574 (2011).
26. Sheffler, W. & Baker, D. RosettaHoles: rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation. Protein Sci. 18, 229-239 (2009).
27. Park, B.S. & Lee, J.O. Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. Exp. Mol. Med. 45, e66 (2013).
28. Matsushima, N. & Miyashita, H. Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains containing intervening motifs in plants. Biomolecules 2, 288-311 (2012).
29. Wei, T. et al. LRRML: a conformational database and an XML description of leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). BMC Struct. Biol. 8, 47 (2008).
30. Bell, J.K. et al. The molecular structure of the Toll-like receptor 3 ligand-binding domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10976-10980 (2005).
31. Park, B.S. et al. The structural basis of lipopolysaccharide recognition by the TLR4-MD-2 complex. Nature 458, 1191-1195 (2009).
32. Hothorn, M. et al. Structural basis of steroid hormone perception by the receptor kinase BRI1. Nature 474, 467-471 (2011).
33. Chen, R. & Weng, Z. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 51, 397-408 (2003).
34. Gabb, H.A., Jackson, R.M. & Sternberg, M.J. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 106-120 (1997).
35. Lawrence, M.C. & Colman, P.M. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 946-950 (1993).
36. Jones, S. & Thornton, J.M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13-20 (1996).
37. Fleishman, S.J. et al. Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332, 816-821 (2011).
38. Procko, E. et al. Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3563-3575 (2013).
39. Epa, V.C. et al. Structural model for the interaction of a designed Ankyrin Repeat Protein with the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. PLoS ONE 8, e59163 (2013).
40. Lee, J.J. et al. A high-affinity protein binder that blocks the IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway effectively suppresses non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Ther. 22, 1254-1265 (2014).
41. Nivón, L.G., Moretti, R. & Baker, D. A Pareto-optimal refinement method for protein design scaffolds. PLoS ONE 8, e59004 (2013).
42. Gibson, D.G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343-345 (2009).
43. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 (1997).
44. McCoy, A.J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658-674 (2007).
45. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
46. Winn, M.D., Murshudov, G.N. & Papiz, M.Z. Macromolecular TLS refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions. Methods Enzymol. 374, 300-321 (2003).