Erratum: Identifying Loci Contributing to Natural Variation in Xenobiotic Resistance in Drosophila (PLoS Genetics (2015) 11:11 (e1005663) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005663);Identifying Loci Contributing to Natural Variation in Xenobiotic Resistance in Drosophila

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2015, Pages

  Najarro, Michael A ^a   Hackett, Jennifer L ^a   Smith, Brittny R ^a   Highfill, Chad A ^a   King, Elizabeth G ^b   Long, Anthony D ^c   Macdonald, Stuart J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAFFEINE; CYTOCHROME P450; RNA; CYTOCHROME P-450 12D1, DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEIN; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CYP12D1 GENE; DETOXIFICATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RESISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAIN; RNA INTERFERENCE; RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TREND STUDY; UPREGULATION; XENOBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; DRUG INACTIVATION; DRUG RESISTANCE; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ANIMALS; CAFFEINE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CYTOCHROME P-450 ENZYME SYSTEM; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; DRUG RESISTANCE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INACTIVATION, METABOLIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; XENOBIOTICS;

EID: 84949257841     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1005830     Document Type: Erratum

References (76)

1. Glendinning JI, How do predators cope with chemically defended foods? Biol Bull. 2007;213(3):252–66. 18083965
2. Mithofer A, Boland W, Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:431–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854 22404468
3. Zhong W, Maradit-Kremers H, St Sauver JL, Yawn BP, Ebbert JO, Roger VL, et al. Age and sex patterns of drug prescribing in a defined American population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(7):697–707. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.04.021 23790544
4. Holzinger F, Frick C, Wink M, Molecular basis for the insensitivity of the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) to cardiac glycosides. FEBS Lett. 1992;314(3):477–80. 1334851
5. Zhen Y, Aardema ML, Medina EM, Schumer M, Andolfatto P, Parallel molecular evolution in an herbivore community. Science. 2012;337(6102):1634–7. 23019645
6. Li X, Schuler MA, Berenbaum MR, Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:231–53. 16925478
7. Xu C, Li CY, Kong AN, Induction of phase I, II and III drug metabolism/transport by xenobiotics. Arch Pharm Res. 2005;28(3):249–68. 15832810
8. Snyder MJ, Glendinning JI, Causal connection between detoxification enzyme activity and consumption of a toxic plant compound. J Comp Physiol A. 1996;179(2):255–61. 8765561
9. Wink M, Theile V, Alkaloid tolerance in Manduca sexta and phylogenetically related sphingids (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Chemoecology. 2002;12:29–46.
10. Chung H, Bogwitz MR, McCart C, Andrianopoulos A, Ffrench-Constant RH, Batterham P, et al. Cis-regulatory elements in the Accord retrotransposon result in tissue-specific expression of the Drosophila melanogaster insecticide resistance gene Cyp6g1. Genetics. 2007;175(3):1071–7. 17179088
11. Daborn PJ, Yen JL, Bogwitz MR, Le Goff G, Feil E, Jeffers S, et al. A single p450 allele associated with insecticide resistance in Drosophila. Science. 2002;297(5590):2253–6. 12351787
12. Schmidt JM, Good RT, Appleton B, Sherrard J, Raymant GC, Bogwitz MR, et al. Copy number variation and transposable elements feature in recent, ongoing adaptation at the Cyp6g1 locus. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(6):e1000998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000998 20585622
13. Carrillo R, Gibson G, Unusual genetic architecture of natural variation affecting drug resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 2002;80(3):205–13. 12688659
14. King EG, Kislukhin G, Walters KN, Long AD, Using Drosophila melanogaster to identify chemotherapy toxicity genes. Genetics. 2014;198(1):31–43. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.161968 25236447
15. Marriage TN, King EG, Long AD, Macdonald SJ, Fine-mapping nicotine resistance loci in Drosophila using a multiparent advanced generation inter-cross population. Genetics. 2014;198(1):45–57. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.162107 25236448
16. Ge D, Fellay J, Thompson AJ, Simon JS, Shianna KV, Urban TJ, et al. Genetic variation in IL28B predicts hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance. Nature. 2009;461(7262):399–401. doi: 10.1038/nature08309 19684573
17. Shuldiner AR, O'Connell JR, Bliden KP, Gandhi A, Ryan K, Horenstein RB, et al. Association of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype with the antiplatelet effect and clinical efficacy of clopidogrel therapy. JAMA. 2009;302(8):849–57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1232 19706858
18. Takeuchi F, McGinnis R, Bourgeois S, Barnes C, Eriksson N, Soranzo N, et al. A genome-wide association study confirms VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP4F2 as principal genetic determinants of warfarin dose. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(3):e1000433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000433 19300499
19. Bhaskara S, Dean ED, Lam V, Ganguly R, Induction of two cytochrome P450 genes, Cyp6a2 and Cyp6a8, of Drosophila melanogaster by caffeine in adult flies and in cell culture. Gene. 2006;377:56–64. 16713132
20. Misra JR, Horner MA, Lam G, Thummel CS, Transcriptional regulation of xenobiotic detoxification in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2011;25(17):1796–806. doi: 10.1101/gad.17280911 21896655
21. Morra R, Kuruganti S, Lam V, Lucchesi JC, Ganguly R, Functional analysis of the cis-acting elements responsible for the induction of the Cyp6a8 and Cyp6g1 genes of Drosophila melanogaster by DDT, phenobarbital and caffeine. Insect Mol Biol. 2010;19(1):121–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2009.00954.x 20002224
22. Willoughby L, Chung H, Lumb C, Robin C, Batterham P, Daborn PJ, A comparison of Drosophila melanogaster detoxification gene induction responses for six insecticides, caffeine and phenobarbital. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36(12):934–42. 17098168
23. Churchill GA, Airey DC, Allayee H, Angel JM, Attie AD, Beatty J, et al. The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits. Nat Genet. 2004;36(11):1133–7. 15514660
24. Kover PX, Valdar W, Trakalo J, Scarcelli N, Ehrenreich IM, Purugganan MD, et al. A Multiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(7):e1000551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000551 19593375
25. Macdonald SJ, Long AD, Joint estimates of quantitative trait locus effect and frequency using synthetic recombinant populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2007;176(2):1261–81. 17435224
26. Rat Genome S, Mapping C, Baud A, Hermsen R, Guryev V, Stridh P, et al. Combined sequence-based and genetic mapping analysis of complex traits in outbred rats. Nat Genet. 2013;45(7):767–75. doi: 10.1038/ng.2644 23708188
27. Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, Chesler EJ, et al. High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity outbred population. Genetics. 2012;190(2):437–47. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132597 22345611
28. Threadgill DW, Churchill GA, Ten years of the collaborative cross. G3 (Bethesda). 2012;2(2):153–6.
29. Valdar W, Flint J, Mott R, Simulating the collaborative cross: power of quantitative trait loci detection and mapping resolution in large sets of recombinant inbred strains of mice. Genetics. 2006;172(3):1783–97. 16361245
30. King EG, Macdonald SJ, Long AD, Properties and power of the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource for the routine dissection of complex traits. Genetics. 2012;191(3):935–49. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138537 22505626
31. King EG, Merkes CM, McNeil CL, Hoofer SR, Sen S, Broman KW, et al. Genetic dissection of a model complex trait using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource. Genome Res. 2012;22(8):1558–66. doi: 10.1101/gr.134031.111 22496517
32. Kislukhin G, King EG, Walters KN, Macdonald SJ, Long AD, The genetic architecture of methotrexate toxicity is similar in Drosophila melanogaster and humans. G3 (Bethesda). 2013;3(8):1301–10.
33. Huang W, Massouras A, Inoue Y, Peiffer J, Ramia M, Tarone AM, et al. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines. Genome Res. 2014;24(7):1193–208. doi: 10.1101/gr.171546.113 24714809
34. Mackay TF, Richards S, Stone EA, Barbadilla A, Ayroles JF, Zhu D, et al. The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature. 2012;482(7384):173–8. doi: 10.1038/nature10811 22318601
35. Ivanov DK, Escott-Price V, Ziehm M, Magwire MM, Mackay TF, Partridge L, et al. Longevity GWAS Using the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015.
36. King EG, Sanderson BJ, McNeil CL, Long AD, Macdonald SJ, Genetic dissection of the Drosophila melanogaster female head transcriptome reveals widespread allelic heterogeneity. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004322 24810915
37. Giraud H, Lehermeier C, Bauer E, Falque M, Segura V, Bauland C, et al. Linkage disequilibrium with linkage analysis of multiline crosses reveals different multiallelic QTL for hybrid performance in the flint and dent heterotic groups of maize. Genetics. 2014;198(4):1717–34. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169367 25271305
38. Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR, Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61:437–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-100708-204735 20059347
39. Weischenfeldt J, Symmons O, Spitz F, Korbel JO, Phenotypic impact of genomic structural variation: insights from and for human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(2):125–38. doi: 10.1038/nrg3373 23329113
40. Zichner T, Garfield DA, Rausch T, Stutz AM, Cannavo E, Braun M, et al. Impact of genomic structural variation in Drosophila melanogaster based on population-scale sequencing. Genome Res. 2013;23(3):568–79. doi: 10.1101/gr.142646.112 23222910
41. Good RT, Gramzow L, Battlay P, Sztal T, Batterham P, Robin C, The molecular evolution of cytochrome P450 genes within and between Drosophila species. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(5):1118–34. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu083 24751979
42. McDonnell CM, King D, Comeron JM, Li H, Sun W, Berenbaum MR, et al. Evolutionary toxicogenomics: diversification of the Cyp12d1 and Cyp12d3 genes in Drosophila species. J Mol Evol. 2012;74(5–6):281–96. doi: 10.1007/s00239-012-9506-3 22811321
43. Schrider DR, Begun DJ, Hahn MW, Detecting highly differentiated copy-number variants from pooled population sequencing. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2013:344–55. 23424139
44. Adams MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA, Evans CA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides PG, et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287(5461):2185–95. 10731132
45. St Pierre SE, Ponting L, Stefancsik R, McQuilton P, FlyBase C, FlyBase 102—advanced approaches to interrogating FlyBase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D780–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1092 24234449
46. Mitchell CL, Saul MC, Lei L, Wei H, Werner T, The mechanisms underlying alpha-amanitin resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: a microarray analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093489 24695618
47. Coelho A, Fraichard S, Le Goff G, Faure P, Artur Y, Ferveur JF, et al. Cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism of caffeine in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117328 25671424
48. Sztal T, Chung H, Berger S, Currie PD, Batterham P, Daborn PJ, A cytochrome p450 conserved in insects is involved in cuticle formation. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036544 22574182
49. Osterwalder T, Yoon KS, White BH, Keshishian H, A conditional tissue-specific transgene expression system using inducible GAL4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(22):12596–601. 11675495
50. Long AD, Macdonald SJ, King EG, Dissecting complex traits using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource. Trends Genet. 2014;30(11):488–95. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.009 25175100
51. Turner TL, Miller PM, Cochrane VA, Combining genome-wide methods to investigate the genetic complexity of courtship song variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(9):2113–20. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst111 23777628
52. Beavis W. The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Corn and Sorghum Industry Research Conference. Washington, DC: American Seed Trade Association; 1994. p. 250–66.
53. Xu S, Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. Genetics. 2003;165(4):2259–68. 14704201
54. Parker CC, Carbonetto P, Sokoloff G, Park YJ, Abney M, Palmer AA, High-resolution genetic mapping of complex traits from a combined analysis of F2 and advanced intercross mice. Genetics. 2014;198(1):103–16. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167056 25236452
55. Chung H, Sztal T, Pasricha S, Sridhar M, Batterham P, Daborn PJ, Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster cytochrome P450 genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(14):5731–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812141106 19289821
56. Harrop TW, Pearce SL, Daborn PJ, Batterham P, Whole-genome expression analysis in the third instar larval midgut of Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4(11):2197–205.
57. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, Ingle CE, Beazley C, Thorne N, et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science. 2007;315(5813):848–53. 17289997
58. Li X, Zhuo R, Tiong S, Di Cara F, King-Jones K, Hughes SC, et al. The Smc5/Smc6/MAGE complex confers resistance to caffeine and genotoxic stress in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059866 23555814
59. King-Jones K, Horner MA, Lam G, Thummel CS, The DHR96 nuclear receptor regulates xenobiotic responses in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2006;4(1):37–48. 16814731
60. Sun W, Valero MC, Seong KM, Steele LD, Huang IT, Lee CH, et al. A glycine insertion in the estrogen-related receptor (ERR) is associated with enhanced expression of three cytochrome P450 genes in transgenic Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118779 25761142
61. Lee Y, Moon SJ, Montell C, Multiple gustatory receptors required for the caffeine response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(11):4495–500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811744106 19246397
62. Moon SJ, Kottgen M, Jiao Y, Xu H, Montell C, A taste receptor required for the caffeine response in vivo. Curr Biol. 2006;16(18):1812–7. 16979558
63. Lynch M, Walsh B, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1998.
64. Pritchard JK, Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases? Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(1):124–37. 11404818
65. Thornton KR, Foran AJ, Long AD, Properties and modeling of GWAS when complex disease risk is due to non-complementing, deleterious mutations in genes of large effect. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003258 23437004
66. DIAbetes Genetics Replication Meta-analysiset al. Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):234–44. doi: 10.1038/ng.2897 24509480
67. Stone EA, Joint genotyping on the fly: identifying variation among a sequenced panel of inbred lines. Genome Res. 2012;22(5):966–74. doi: 10.1101/gr.129122.111 22367192
68. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RDC. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 31–101. 2011.
69. Churchill GA, Doerge RW, Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994;138(3):963–71. 7851788
70. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL, TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14(4):R36. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 23618408
71. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL, TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(9):1105–11. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 19289445
72. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L, Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(1):46–53. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2450 23222703
73. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621 20436464
74. Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, et al. A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature. 2007;448(7150):151–6. 17625558
75. Green EW, Fedele G, Giorgini F, Kyriacou CP, A Drosophila RNAi collection is subject to dominant phenotypic effects. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):222–3. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2856 24577271
76. Broman K, Sen S, A Guide to QTL Mapping with R/qtl. New York: Springer Dordrecht; 2009.