Dissecting complex traits using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 488-495

  Long, Anthony D ^a   Macdonald, Stuart J ^b   King, Elizabeth G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex traits; Drosophila melanogaster; Missing heritability; Multi parental population; Multiallelism

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED INTERCROSS LINE; ALLELE; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; DROSOPHILA SYNTHETIC POPULATION RESOURCE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; HEREDITY; HERITABILITY; INDEL MUTATION; MULTI PARENTAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TRANSPOSON; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; MALE; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOMICS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84927509365     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.009     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Longman. 4th edn.
2. Roff D.A. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Paterson A.H., et al. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 1988, 335:721-726.
4. Lander E.S., Botstein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989, 121:185-199.
5. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 2007, 447:661-678. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium.
6. Welter D., et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D1001-D1006. 10.1093/nar/gkt1229.
7. Manolio T.A., et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009, 461:747-753.
8. Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:234-244. DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium.
9. Spencer C.C.A., et al. Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000477.
10. Mackay T.F.C., et al. The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature 2012, 482:173-178.
11. Risch N., Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 1996, 273:1516-1517.
12. Huang W., et al. Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1193-1208.
13. Kover P.X., et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000551.
14. King E.G., et al. Genetic dissection of a model complex trait using the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1558-1566.
15. King E.G., et al. Properties and power of the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource for the routine dissection of complex traits. Genetics 2012, 191:935-949.
16. Valdar W., et al. Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:879-887.
17. Rat Genome Sequencing and Mapping Consortium, et al. Combined sequence-based and genetic mapping analysis of complex traits in outbred rats. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45:767-775.
18. Fu Y.X. Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1995, 48:172-197.
19. Nelson M.R., et al. An abundance of rare functional variants in 202 drug target genes sequenced in 14,002 people. Science 2012, 337:100-104.
20. Tennessen J.A., et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes. Science 2012, 337:64-69.
21. Pritchard J.K. Are rare variants responsible for susceptibility to complex diseases?. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001, 69:124-137.
22. Thornton K.R., et al. Properties and modeling of GWAS when complex disease risk is due to non-complementing, deleterious mutations in genes of large effect. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003258.
23. Madsen B.E., Browning S.R. A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000384.
24. Wu M.C., et al. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 89:82-93.
25. Park J-H., et al. Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:570-575.
26. Laurie C.C., et al. Associations between DNA sequence variation and variation in expression of the Adh gene in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1991, 129:489-499.
27. Laurie C.C., Stam L.F. The effect of an intronic polymorphism on alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1994, 138:379-385.
28. Stam L.F., Laurie C.C. Molecular dissection of a major gene effect on a quantitative trait: the level of alcohol dehydrogenase expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1996, 144:1559-1564.
29. King J.J., McDonald J.F. Post-translational control of alcohol dehydrogenase levels in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1987, 115:693-699.
30. Marriage T., et al. Fine-mapping nicotine resistance loci in Drosophila using a multiparent advanced generation intercross population. Genetics 2014, 198. 10.1534/genetics.114.162107.
31. Kislukhin G., et al. The genetic architecture of methotrexate toxicity is similar in Drosophila melanogaster and humans. G3 2013, 3:1301-1310.
32. King E.G., et al. Using Drosophila melanogaster to identify chemotherapy toxicity genes. Genetics 2014, 198. 10.1534/genetics.114.161968.
33. King E.G., et al. Genetic dissection of the Drosophila melanogaster female head transcriptome reveals widespread allelic heterogeneity. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10:e1004322.
34. Gruber J.D., Long A.D. Cis-regulatory variation is typically polyallelic in Drosophila. Genetics 2008, 181:661-670.
35. Zhang X., et al. Genetic architecture of regulatory variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Res. 2011, 21:725-733.
36. Lappalainen T., et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 2013, 501:506-511.
37. Powell J.E., et al. Congruence of additive and non-additive effects on gene expression estimated from pedigree and SNP data. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003502.
38. Macdonald S.J., Long A.D. Joint estimates of quantitative trait locus effect and frequency using synthetic recombinant populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2006, 176:1261-1281.
39. Aylor D.L., et al. Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging collaborative cross. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1213-1222.
40. Duffy J.B. GAL4 system in Drosophila: a fly geneticist's swiss army knife. Genesis 2002, 34:1-15.
41. Gratz S.J., et al. Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila. Genetics 2014, 196:961-971.
42. King M.C., Wilson A.C. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 1975, 188:107-116.
43. Gibson G., Weir B. The quantitative genetics of transcription. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:616-623.
44. Gilad Y., et al. Revealing the architecture of gene regulation: the promise of eQTL studies. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:408-415.
45. Degner J.F., et al. DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature 2012, 482:390-394.
46. Gaffney D.J., et al. Dissecting the regulatory architecture of gene expression QTLs. Genome Biol. 2012, 13:R7.
47. McClellan J., King M-C. Genetic heterogeneity in human disease. Cell 2010, 141:210-217.
48. Huang X., et al. Analysis of natural allelic variation in Arabidopsis using a multiparent recombinant inbred line population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:4488-4493.
49. Threadgill D.W., Churchill G.A. Ten years of the Collaborative Cross. Genetics 2012, 190:291-294.
50. Cubillos F.A., et al. High-resolution mapping of complex traits with a four-parent advanced intercross yeast population. Genetics 2013, 195:1141-1155.
51. McMullen M.D., et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 2009, 325:737-740.
52. Cridland J.M., et al. Abundance and distribution of transposable elements in two Drosophila QTL mapping resources. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30:2311-2327.
53. Baird N.A., et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3376.
54. The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 2012, 190:389-401. Collaborative Cross Consortium.