The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review: Stress and Coping With Manuscript Rejection

Journal of Management Inquiry

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 11-26

  Horn, Sierk A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

careers; disciplinary writing; peer review; scholarly publication; social identity; stress

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949239440     PISSN: 10564926     EISSN: 15526542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1056492615586597     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. M.S.AndersonE.A.RonningR.de VriesB.C.Martinson (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 437-461.
2. R.D.Arvey (1972). Task performance as a function of perceived effort performance and performance-reward contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 324-433.
3. B.E.AshfordF.Mael (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
4. S.J.AshfordR.BlattD.VandeWalle (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773-799.
5. S.J.Ball (2000). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society?The Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 1-23.
6. A.Bandura (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S.Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7. A.BanduraR.Wood (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 805-814.
8. T.BecherP.Towler (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9. A.G.Bedeian (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198-216.
10. A.G.BedeianS.G.TaylorA.N.Miller (2003). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 715-725.
11. C.Bergstrom (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of academic journals. Retrieved from http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publications/Bergstrom07.pdf
12. S.BerjotE.AltintasF.-X.LesageE.Grebot (2013). The impact of work stressors on identity threats and perceived stress: An exploration of sources of difficulty at work among French psychologists. SAGE Open, 3(3), 1-11.
13. S.BerjotN.Gillet (2011). Stress and coping with discrimination and stigmatization. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(33), 1-13.
14. S.BerjotN.Girault-LidvanN.Gillet (2012). Appraising stigmatization and discrimination: Construction and validation of a questionnaire assessing threat and challenge appraisals to personal and social identity. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 12, 191-216.
15. J.BlascovichW.B.MendesS.B.HunterB.Lickel (2000). Stigma, threat, and social interactions. In T.HeathertonR.KleckJ.G.Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 307-333). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. J.BlascovichJ.Tomaka (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M.P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. M.BongE.M.Skaalvik (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1-40.
18. E.L.Boyer (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professorate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. M.B.Brewer (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity and the self. In M.R.LearyJ.P.Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 480-491). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20. R.Brown (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
21. P.J.Burke (1991). Identity processes and stress. American Sociological Review, 56, 836-849.
22. P.J.BurkeD.C.Reitzes (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 83-92.
23. M.D.CannonA.C.Edmondson (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38, 299-319.
24. D.E.ChubinE.J.Hackett (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and US science policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25. S.Clegg (2008). Academic identities under threat?British Educational Research Journal, 34, 329-345.
26. C.H.Cooley (1956). Human nature and the social order. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
27. J.Cope (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 604-623.
28. J.Crocker (1999). Social stigma and self-esteem: Situational construction of self-worth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 89-107.
29. J.CrockerR.Luhtanen (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60-67.
30. J.CrockerB.Major (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
31. N.E.Day (2011). The silent majority: Manuscript rejection and its impact on scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 704-718.
32. M.De RondA.N.Miller (2005). Publish or perish. Bane or boon of academic life. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321-329.
33. K.De WitteN.Rogge (2010). To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance. Scientometrics, 85, 657-680.
34. S.S.DickersonM.E.Kemeny (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355-391.
35. D.EdenS.Rynes (2003). Publishing across borders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 679-683.
36. N.EllemersP.KortekaasJ.W.Ouwerkerk (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
37. C.G.Ellison (1993). Religious involvement and self perception among black Americans. Social Forces, 71, 1027-1055.
38. J.R.Faria (2005). The game academics play: Editors versus authors. Bulletin of Economic Research, 57, 1-12.
39. J.Flowerdew (2008). Scholarly writers who use English as an additional language: What can Goffman’s “stigma” tell us?Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 77-86.
40. S.FolkmanR.S.Lazarus (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 150-170.
41. S.FolkmanR.S.LazarusS.PimleyJ.Novacek (1987). Age differences in stress and coping processes. Psychological Aging, 2(2), 171-184.
42. D.D.FranksF.Marolla (1976). Efficacious action and social approval as interacting dimensions of self-esteem: A tentative formulation through construct validation. Sociometry, 39, 324-341.
43. N.Garmezy (1991). Resiliency and vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes associated with poverty. American Behavioral Scientist, 34, 416-430.
44. E.Goffman (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. J.W.GrahamR.E.Stablein (1995). A funny thing happened on the way to publication: Newcomers’ perspectives on publishing in the organizational sciences. In L.L.CummingsP.J.Frost (Eds.), Publishing in organizational sciences (pp. 113-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. B.Graue (2006). The transformative power of reviewing. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 36-41.
47. D.C.HambrickM.-J.Chen (2008). New academic fields as admittance seeking social movements: The case of strategic management. Academy of Management Review, 33, 32-54.
48. L.L.Hargens (1988). Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates. American Sociological Review, 53, 139-151.
49. C.HarveyA.KellyH.MorrisM.Rowlinson (2010). Academic journal quality guide. Retrieved from http://charteredabs.org
50. P.HegartyA.M.Golden (2008). Attributions about the controllability of stigmatized traits: Antecedents or justifications of prejudice?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1023-1044.
51. E.T.Higgins (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
52. S.Hirschauer (2010). Editorial judgments: A praxeology of “voting” in peer review. Social Studies of Science, 40, 71-103.
53. M.A.HoggD.J.Terry (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
54. C.S.Holling (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23.
55. R.HoltF.den Hond (2013). Sapere audere. Organization Studies, 34, 1587-1600.
56. S.HornA.Cross (2013, July). The disciplining forces of disciplines and their effects on interdisciplinarity: The case of international business studies. Paper presented at AIB Istanbul, Turkey.
57. D.F.Horrobin (1990). The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. Journal of the American Medical Association. Retrieved from http://www.fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/jama.pdf
58. E.K.Horwitz (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A.L.WendenJ.Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119-129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. L.HuangM.FridegerJ.L.Pearce (2013). Political skill: Explaining the effects of nonnative accent on managerial hiring and entrepreneurial investment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1005-1017.
60. C.HumphreyP.Moizer (1995). Questioning the value of the research selectivity process in British university accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 141-164.
61. L.Hurmerinta-PeltomäkiN.Nummela (2006). Mixed-methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46, 439-459.
62. K.Hyland (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
63. C.G.Jennings (2006). Quality and value: The true purpose of peer review. Nature Online Peer Review. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05032.html
64. L.JussimP.PalumboC.ChatmanS.MadonA.Smith (2000). Stigma and self-fulfilling prophecies. In T.HeathertonR.KleckJ.G.Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 374-418). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
65. A.N.KlugerA.DeNisi (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
66. R.S.LazarusS.Folkman (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
67. C.J.LeeC.R.SugimotoG.ZhangB.Cronin (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 2-17.
68. C.Leslie (1990). Scientific racism: Reflections on peer review, science and ideology. Social Science & Medicine, 31, 891-905.
69. T.LillisM.J.Curry (2010). Academic writing in a global context. London, England: Routledge.
70. S.S.Luthar (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
71. T.Luukonen (2012). Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review. Emerging ERC practices. Research Evaluation, 21, 48-60.
72. S.Macdonald (2014). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry. Advance online publication. 10.1177/ 1056492614554773
73. S.MacdonaldJ.Kam (2007). Ring a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 640-655.
74. J.M.Mahoney (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
75. B.MajorR.H.Gramzow (1999). Abortion as stigma: Cognitive and emotional implications of concealment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 735-745.
76. B.MajorL.T.O’Brian (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421.
77. M.R.McGrailC.M.RikardR.Jones (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 19-35.
78. A.N.MillerS.G.TaylorA.G.Bedeian (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16, 422-445.
79. J.B.Miner (2003). Commentary on Arthur Bedeian’s “The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors.”Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 339-343.
80. P.Moizer (2009). Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game?Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 285-304.
81. M.M.MorettiE.T.Higgins (1990). Relating self-discrepancy to self-esteem: The contribution of discrepancy beyond actual-self ratings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 108-123.
82. T.A.MortonS.A.HaslamT.PostmesM.K.Ryan (2006). We value what values us: The appeal of identity-affirming science. Political Psychology, 27, 823-838.
83. S.L.NeubergD.M.SmithT.Asher (2000). Why people stigmatise: Toward a biocultural framework. In T.F.HeathertonR.E.KleckM.R.HeblJ.G.Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 31-61). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
84. J.Newton (2000). Feeding the beast or improving quality? Academics’ perceptions of quality assurance and quality monitoring. Quality in Higher Education, 6, 153-163.
85. J.E.Pachankis (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328-345.
86. R.L.PaetzoldR.L.DipboyeK.D.Elsbach (2008). A new look at stigmatization in and of organisations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 186-193.
87. F.Pajares (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
88. J.A.Raelin (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 124-129.
89. B.R.Ragins (2008). Disclosure disconnects: Antecedents and consequences of disclosing invisible stigmas across life domains. Academy of Management Review, 33, 194-215.
90. A.RileyP.J.Burke (1995). Identities and self-verification in the small group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 61-73.
91. U.Römer (2009). English in academia: Does nativeness matter?Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20(2), 89-100.
92. M.Rosenberg (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
93. K.M.RuggieroD.M.Taylor (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 826-838.
94. M.D.Rutter (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598-611.
95. M.D.Rutter (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.
96. I.SarnoffP.Zimbardo (1961). Anxiety, fear, and social affiliation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 356-363.
97. R.SchwarzerM.Jerusalem (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J.WeinmanS.WrightM.Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: Nfer Nelson.
98. M.Shih (2004). Positive stigma: Examining resilience and empowerment in overcoming stigma. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 175-185.
99. J.S.ShraugherT.J.Schoeneman (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573.
100. L.SmartD.M.Wegner (2003). The hidden costs of hidden stigma. In T.F.HeathertonR.E.KleckM.R.HeblJ.G.Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 220-242). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
101. R.Spier (2002). The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology, 20, 357-358.
102. W.H.Starbuck (2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value of peer review?Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344-351.
103. W.H.Starbuck (2005). How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organization Science, 16, 180-200.
104. C.M.SteeleS.J.SpencerJ.Aronson (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
105. J.E.StetsP.J.Burke (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
106. J.G.StoutN.Dasgupta (2013). Mastering one’s destiny mastery goals promote challenge and success despite social identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 748-762.
107. Stress in the world of academia. (2013, July3). Occupational Health. Retrieved from http://www.personneltoday.com/hr/stress-in-the-world-of-academia
108. M.SverkeJ.HellgrenK.Näswall (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 242-264.
109. H.Tajfel (1978). Interindividual and intergroup behaviour. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-60). London, England: Academic Press.
110. H.TajfelJ.C.Turner (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S.WorchelW.G.Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
111. D.Tannen (2002). Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1651-1669.
112. J.W.ThibautL.Walker (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
113. P.A.Thoits (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 101-112.
114. E.J.Thorsen (1996). Stress in academe: What bothers professors?Higher Education, 31, 471-489.
115. S.Tietze (2008). The work of management academics: An English language perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 371-386.
116. S.TietzeP.Dick (2009). Hegemonic practices and knowledge production in the management academy: An English language perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25, 119-123.
117. J.B.TorresV.S.Solberg (2001). Role of self-efficacy, stress, social integration, and family support in Latino college student persistence and health. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 53-63.
118. L.Trevino (2008). Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 8-10.
119. M.Y.TytherleighC.WebbC.L.CooperC.Ricketts (2005). Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: A comparative study of all staff categories. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 41-61.
120. B.UzziS.MukherjeeM.StringerB.Jones (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 243, 468-472.
121. D.Van Knippenberg (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
122. A.Wallwork (2010). English for writing research papers. London, England: Springer.
123. D.WatsonR.Friend (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448-457.
124. A.Webb (1994). Two tales from a reluctant manager. In S.Weil (Ed.), Introducing change from the top in universities and colleges: 10 personal accounts (pp. 44-55). London, England: Kogan Page.
125. B.Weiner (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychology Review, 92, 548-573.
126. B.Weiner (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In P.Van LangeA.W.KruglanskiE.T.Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 135-155). London, England: Sage.
127. What’s wrong with science? (2013, December14). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21591549-and-nature-and-cell-nobel-prize-winner-attacks-elite-journals-whats-wrong
128. M.ZannaJ.Cooper (1976). Dissonance and the attribution process. In J.H.HarveyW.J.IckesR.F.Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (pp. 156-172). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum.