Editor's comments: Why review? Because reviewing is a professional responsibility

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 8-10

  Treviño, Linda K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38049165271     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.27744831     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
2. Harrison, D. 2002. Obligations and obfuscations in the review process. Academy of Management Journal. 46: 1079-1084.
3. Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. 2007. What causes a management article to be cited - Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50: 491-506.
4. Laine, C., & Mulrow, C. 2003. Peer review: Integral to science and indispensable to Annals. Annals of Internal Medicine. 39: 1038-1040.
5. Weller, A. C. 2001. Editorial peer review: Its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today.