Sapere Aude

Organization Studies

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1587-1600

  Holt, Robin ^a   den Hond, Frank ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886634923     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840613502293     Document Type: Editorial

References (81)

1. Abbott A.Methods of discovery: Heuristics for the social sciences. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2004:.
2. Ahrne G.,Brunsson N.Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization.Organization. 2011;18:83-104.
3. Alvesson M.Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research.Academy of Management Review. 2003;28:13-33.
4. Alvesson M.,Sandberg J.Generating research questions through problematization.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:247-271.
5. Bakken T.,Hernes T.Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead.Organization Studies. 2006;27:1599-1616.
6. Barley S. R.When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:16-20.
7. Barley S. R.Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies.Organization Studies. 2010;31:777-805.
8. Battilana J.,Anteby M.,Sengul M.The circulation of ideas across academic communities: When locals re-import exported ideas.Organization Studies. 2010;31:695-713.
9. Baum J. A. C.Cultural group selection in organization studies.Organization Studies. 2007;28 (1): 37-47.
10. Baum J. A. C.European and North American approaches to organizations and strategy research: An Atlantic divide? Not.Organization Science. 2011;22:1663-1679.
11. Boxenbaum E.,Rouleau L.New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:272-296.
12. Butler J.Critique, dissent, disciplinarity.Critical Inquiry. 2009;35:773-795.
13. Cavell S.Disowning knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987:.
14. Chia R.Time, duration and simultaneity: Rethinking process and change in organizational analysis.Organization Studies. 2002;23:863-868.
15. Cooper R.Organs of process: Rethinking human organization.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1547-1573.
16. Corley K. G.,Gioia D. A.Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:12-32.
17. Cornelissen J.,Durand R.More than just novelty: Conceptual blending and causality.Academy of Management Review. 2012;37:152-154.
18. What is theory? Answers from the social and cultural sciences. Corvellec H., ed. Malmö: Liber/Copenhagen Business Press; 2013:.
19. Courpasson D.,Arellano-Gault D.,Brown A. D.,Lounsbury M.Organization studies on the look-out? Being read, being listened to.Organization Studies. 2008;29:1383-1390.
20. Davis M.That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 1971;1:309-344.
21. Driver M.Struggling with lack: A Lacanian perspective on organizational identity.Organization Studies. 2009;30:55-72.
22. Drori G. S.,Meyer J. W.,Hwang H.Globalization and organization. World society and organizational change. Drori G. S.Meyer J. W.Hwang H., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006:1-22.
23. Fligstein N.The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
24. Flyvbjerg B.Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
25. Furedi F.On tolerance: A defense of moral independence. London: Continuum; 2011:.
26. Gabriel Y.Organizations: A space for ideas, identities and agonies.Organization Studies. 2010;31:757-775.
27. Grey C.Organizing studies: Publications, politics and polemic.Organization Studies. 2010;31:677-694.
28. Guba E. G.,Lincoln Y. S.Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:191-215.
29. Gulati R.Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:775-782.
30. Hambrick D. C.The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:1346-1352.
31. Hannan M. T.,Pólos L.,Carroll G. R.Logics of organization theory: Audiences, codes, and ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:.
32. Hassard J.Organizational time: Modern, symbolic and postmodern reflections.Organization Studies. 2002;23:885-892.
33. Haug C.Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as social movement infrastructure between organization, network and institution.Organization Studies. 2013;34:705-732.
34. Henrich J,Heine S. J.,Norenzayan A.The weirdest people in the world?.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2010;33:61-83.
35. Hickson D. J.,Agersnap F.,Ferraresi F.,Hofstede G.,Kieser A.,Lammers C. J.,Thoenig J-C.Editorial.Organization Studies. 1980;1:1-2.
36. Hinings C. R.Thirty years of Organization Studies: Enduring themes in a changing institutional field.Organization Studies. 2010;31:659-675.
37. Hirsch P. M.,Lounsbury M. D.Putting the organization back into organization theory. Action, change, and the 'new' institutionalism.Journal of Management Inquiry. 1997;6:79-88.
38. Hodgkinson G. P.,Rousseau D.Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46:534-546.
39. KantI. (1784). What is Enlightenment? Available at: http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/CCREAD/etscc/kant.html (accessed 15 May 2013).
40. Konrad A. M.Opening the black box of editorship. Baruch Y.Konrad A. M.Aguinis H.Starbuck W. H., ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:3-15.
41. Kilduff M.,Mehra A.,Dunn M. B.From blue sky research to problem solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:297-317.
42. Kuhn T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
43. Lammers C. J.The organization of mass murder.Organization Studies. 1995;16:139-156.
44. Lammers C. J.Occupation regimes alike and unlike: British, Dutch and French patterns of inter-organizational control of foreign territories.Organization Studies. 2003;24:1379-1403.
45. Langley A.Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:691-710.
46. Levy D. L.,Scully M. A.The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields.Organization Studies. 2007;28:971-991.
47. Lincoln Y. S.,Guba E. G.Handbook of qualitative research. Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000:163-188.
48. Locke K.,Golden-Biddle K. A.Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and 'problematizing' in organizational studies.Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40:1023-1062.
49. Lounsbury M.,Carberry E.From king to court jester? Weber's fall from grace in organizational theory.Organization Studies. 2005;26:501-525.
50. MacIntyre A.After virtue: A study in moral theory, 3rd edn. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press; 2007 [1981]:.
51. March J. G.The study of organizations and organizing since 1945.Organization Studies. 2007;28:9-19.
52. McKinley W.,Mone M. A.,Moon G.Determinants and development of schools in organization theory.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:634-648.
53. Merton R. K.Social theory and social structure, revised and enlarged edn. Merton R. K., ed. New York: Free Press; 1968 [1957]:39-72.
54. Meyer J. W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83:340-363.
55. Meyer R. E.,Boxenbaum E.Exploring European-ness in organization research.Organization Studies. 2010;31:737-755.
56. Mutch A.Reflexivity and the institutional entrepreneur: A historical exploration.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1123-1140.
57. Oswick C.,Fleming P.,Hanlon G.From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:318-337.
58. Perrow C.A society of organizations.Theory and Society. 1991;20:725-762.
59. Phillips N.Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations.Organization Studies. 1995;16:625-649.
60. Popper K. R.The open society and its enemies, 5th revised edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1971 [1945]:.
61. Raelin J. A.Refereeing the game of peer review.Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2008;7:124-129.
62. Reay T.,Hinings C. R.Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics.Organization Studies. 2009;30:629-652.
63. Ritzer G.The McDonaldization of society. An investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life (rev. edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 2004:.
64. Schreyögg G.,Sydow J.Organizational path dependence: A process view.Organization Studies. 2011;32:321-335.
65. Schwartz-Shea P.,Yanow D.Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York: Routledge; 2012:.
66. Scott W. R.Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995:.
67. Selznick P.Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. Evanston, IL: Harper & Row; 1957:.
68. Spee P.,Jarzabkowski P.Strategic planning as communicative process.Organization Studies. 2011;39:1217-1245.
69. Starbuck W. H.Why I stopped trying to understand the real world.Organization Studies. 2004;25:1233-1254.
70. Starbuck W. H.Living in mythical spaces.Organization Studies. 2007;28:21-25.
71. Strati A.Putting people in the picture: Art and aesthetics in photography and in understanding organizational life.Organization Studies. 2000;21:53-69.
72. Suddaby R.,Hardy C.,Huy Q. N.Where are the new theories of organization? Introduction.Academy of Management Review. 2011;36:236-246.
73. Taylor C.Interpretation and the sciences of man.Review of Metaphysics. 1971;25:3-51.
74. Tsoukas H.,Garud R.,Hardy C.Continuity and change for.Organization Studies. Organization Studies. 2003;24:1003-1014.
75. Üsdiken B.Between contending perspectives and logics: Organizational studies in Europe.Organization Studies. 2010;31:715-735.
76. Van de Ven A. H.Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:486-489.
77. Vermeulen F.On rigour and relevance: Fostering dialectical progress in management research.Academy of Management Journal. 2005;48:978-982.
78. von Wright G. HExplanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1971:.
79. von Wright G. HProblems in the theory of knowledge. von Wright G. H., ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1972:.
80. Weber M.Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1968 [1922]:.
81. Zundel M.,Kokkalis P.Theorizing as engaged practice.Organization Studies. 2010;3:1029-1227.