Self-regulation of learning and preference for written versus audio-recorded feedback by distance education students

Distance Education

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 107-120

  Johnson, Genevieve Marie ^a   Cooke, Audrey ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Audio feedback; distance education; open university; self regulated learning; university students; written feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949203396     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081737     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. P.Afflerbach, P.D.Pearson, & S.G.Paris, (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
2. A.R.Artino, (2008). Promoting academic motivation and self-regulation:Practical guidelines for online instructors. TechTrends, 52, 37–45. doi:10.1007/s11528-008-0153-x
3. A.Artino, & J.Stephens, (2009). Academic motivation and self-regulation:A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 146–151. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001
4. A.Bird, & A.Spiers, (2009, April). Implementing Wimba:A few words in your ear. Paper presented at Wimba Connect 2009:Adventures in Collaboration, Scottsdale, AZ. Retrieved from http://www.wimba.com/connect09/agenda/descriptions/index.php
5. R.A.Bjork, J.Dunlosky, & N.Kornell, (2013). Self-regulated learning:Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
6. A.M.Bourgault, C.Mundy, & T.Joshua, (2013). Comparison of audio vs. written feedback on clinical assignments of nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34, 43–46. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org10.5480/1536-5026-34.1.43
7. M.-H.Cho, & J.Summers, (2012). Factor validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23, 5–28. Retrieved from http://www.aace.org/pubs/jilr
8. C.Coll, M.J.Rochera, & I.de Gispert, (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups:Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
9. M.Credé, & L.A.Phillips, (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
10. K.Cuthrell, E.Fogarty, & P.Anderson, (2009). Is this thing on:University student preferences regarding audio feedback. In I.Gibson, R.Weber, K.McFerrin, R.Carlsen, & D.A.Wills (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 32–35). Waynesville, NC:AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/d/30556
11. C.Evans, & M.Waring, (2011). Student teacher assessment feedback preferences:The influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.011
12. D.R.Garrison, (2011). E-learning in the 21st century:A framework for research and practice. New York, NY:Taylor & Francis.
13. G.Gibbs, & C.Simpson, (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3–31. Retrieved from http://insight.glos.ac.uk/tli/resources/lathe
14. J.A.Green, D.C.Moos, & R.Azevedo, (2011). Self-regulation of learning with computer- based learning environments. In H.Bembenutty (Ed.), Self-regulated learning (pp. 107–116). San Francisco, CA:Wiley.
15. P.Ice, R.Curtis, P.Phillips, & J.Wells, (2007). Using asynchronous feedback to enhance teaching presence and student sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Leaning Networks, 11, 3–25. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/journal-issues/
16. T.Issa, P.Isaias, & T.Issa, (2014). Does MP3 audio feedback enhance students’ learning skills? An international case study. The International Journal of Learning, 19, 15–28. Retrieved from http://ijl.cgpublisher.com
17. G.M.Johnson, & S.M.Davies, (2014). Self-regulated learning in digital environments:Theory, research, praxis. British Journal of Research, 1, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.britishjr.org/index.php/BJR
18. G.M.Johnson, & A.Kupla, (2007). Dimensions of online behavior:Toward a user typology. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 773–780. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0043
19. G.M.Johnson, & R.Oliver, (2014). Small screen technology use among indigenous boarding school adolescents from remote regions of Western Australia. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43, 75–84. doi:10.1017/jie.2014.1510.1017/jie.2014.15
20. T.-H.Lee, P.-D.Shen, & C.-W.Tsai, (2010). Enhance low-achieving students’ learning involvement in Taiwan's higher education:An approach via e-learning with problem-based learning and self-regulated learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 553–565. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.50699910.1080/13562517.2010.506999
21. G.Macgregor, A.Spiers, & C.Taylor, (2011). Exploratory evaluation of audio email technology in formative assessment feedback. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 39–59. doi:10.1080/09687769.2010.547930
22. C.McCormack, & M.J.Taylor, (2006). Electronic delivery of oral feedback on graphic design projects. In L.Markauskaite, P.Goodyear, & P.Belmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 525–528). Sydney:Sydney University Press. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p72.pdf
23. S.Merry, & P.Orsmond, (2008). Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education, 11. Retrieved from www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol11/beej
24. A.M.Morra, & M.I.Asís, (2009). The effect of audio and written teacher responses on EFL student revision. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39, 68–81. Retrieved from http://www.crla.net10.1080/10790195.2009.10850319
25. A.Nortcliffe, & A.Middleton, (2007). Audio feedback for the iPod generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal:International Network for Engineering Education & Research. Retrieved from http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/489.pdf
26. P.Pintrich, (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
27. P.R.Pintrich, D.A.Smith, T.Garcia, & W.J.McKeachie, (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI:National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
28. P.Pintrich, D.Smith, T.Garcia, & W.Mckeachie, (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
29. S.E.Rodway-Dyer, E.Dunne, & M.Newcombe, (2009). Audio and screen visual feedback to support student learning. In H.Davies & L.Creanor (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th ALT-C International Conference (pp. 61–69). Oxford:Association for Learning. Retrieved from repository.alt.ac.uk/641/1/ALT-C_09_proceedings_090806_web_0207.pdf
30. I.Roll, V.Aleven, B.McLaren, & K.Koedinger, (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21, 267–280. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004
31. B.Rotheram, (2009). Sounds good:Quicker, better assessment using audio feedback (Final report). Leeds:Leeds Metropolitan University. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2009/soundsgoodfinalreport.aspx
32. A.D.Rowe, & L.N.Wood, (2008). Student perceptions and preferences for feedback. Asian Social Science, 4, 78–88. doi:10.5539/ass.v4n3p78
33. V.J.Shute, (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
34. K.Swan, & L.F.Shih, (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9, 115–136. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/
35. J.Tang, & C.Harrison, (2011). Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback:Three types of tutor beliefs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 583–604. doi:10.1080/02602931003632340
36. T.-H.Wang, (2011). Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 57, 1801–1812. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.003
37. C.Weld, (2014). Listen to this! Utilizing audio recordings to improve instructor feedback on writing in mathematics. PRIMUS:Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 24, 513–528. doi:10.1080/10511970.2013.876474
38. P.Zhao, & G.Johnson, (2012). A theoretical framework of self-regulated learning with web-based technologies. In P.Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Global TIME 2012 (pp. 163–168). Waynesville, NC:AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/39417
39. C.Zhu, (2012). Providing formative feedback to students via emails and feedback strategies based on student metacognition. Reflecting Education, 8, 78–93. Retrieved from http://www.reflectingeducation.net