Comparison of audio vs. written feedback on clinical assignments of nursing students

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 43-46

  Bourgault, Annette M ^a   Mundy, Cynthia ^b   Joshua, Thomas ^a  

^a AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Georgia Health Sciences Health System   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio commentary; Audio feedback; Clinical teaching; Nursing education research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PILOT STUDY; SENSORY FEEDBACK; WRITING;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PILOT PROJECTS; WRITING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875451531     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.1.43     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alkhasawneh, I. M., Mrayyan, M. T., Docherty, C., Alashram, S., & Yousef, H. Y. (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students' learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Education Today, 28, 572-579.
2. Baard, P. P., & Neville, S. M. (1996). The intrinsically motivated nurse: Help and hindrance from evaluation feedback sessions. Journal of Nursing Administration, 26(7-8), 19-26.
3. Begley, C. M., & White, P. (2003). Irish nursing students' changing self-esteem and fear of negative evaluation during their preregistration program, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(4), 390-401.
4. Glover, P. A. (2000). "Feedback. I listened, reflected, and utilized": Third year nursing students' perceptions and use of feedback in the clinical setting. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 6, 247-252.
5. Hanson, K. J., & Stenvig. T. E. (2008). The good clinical nursing educator and the baccalaureate nursing clinical experience: Attributes and praxis. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(1), 38-42.
6. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, R., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25.
7. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Introduction. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation. Retrieved from http://neteducause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101 a.pdf
8. Sipple, S., & Sommers, J. (2005). A heterotopic space. Retrieved from www.users.muohio.edu/sommerjd/index.htm
9. Still, B. (2006). Talking to students: Embedded voice commenting as a tool for critiquing student writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(4), 460-475.
10. Tornøe, K. A. (2007). Logging the clinical learning experience: Creating a dynamic teaching and learning environment through log-based supervision and student self-assessment. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6(2), 94-103.
11. Research randomizer [Computer software]. Columbia, SC: G. C. Urbaniak & S. Pious.
12. VARK questionnaire (Version 7) [Computer software]. Christchurch, New Zealand and Green Mountain Falls, CO: N. Fleming, & C. Bonwell, C.
13. Veloski. J., Boex. J. R., Grasberger, M. J., Evans. A., & Wolfson, D. B. (2006). Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physician's clinical performance (BME guide No. 7). Medical Teacher, 28(2), 117-128.
14. Wavepad [Computer software]. Canberra, Australia: NCH Switch Sound.