Early parallel activation of semantics and phonology in picture naming: Evidence from a multiple linear regression MEG study

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 3343-3355

  Miozzo, Michele ^a   Pulvermüller, Friedemann ^b,c   Hauk, Olaf ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Language production; Lexical access; MEG

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PHONETICS; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; SEMANTICS; BRAIN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84948671658     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu137     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Alario F-X, Ferrand L, Laganaro M, New B, Frauenfelder UH, Segui J. 2004. Predictors of picture naming speed. Behav Res Method Instrum Comput. 36:140-155.
2. Baayen R. 2004. Psycholinguistics: a critique of some current gold standards. In: Libben G, Nault K, editors. Mental lexicon working papers. Vol. 1. Edmonton (CA): p. 1-45.
3. Baayen R, Piepenbrock R, Van Rijin H. 1993. The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia (PA): Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Balota DA, Yap MJ, Cortese MJ, Hutchison KA, Kessler B, Loftis B, Neely JH, Nelson DL, Simpson GB, Treiman R. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods. 39:445-459.
5. Barry C, Morris CM, Ellis AW. 1997. Naming the Snodgrass and Vander-wart pictures: effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Q J Exp Psychol. 50a:560-585.
6. Barsalou LW, Kyle Simmons W, Barbey AK, Wilson CD. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn Sci. 7:84-91.
7. Bates E, DAmico S, Jacobsen T, Szekely A, Andonova E, Devescovi A, Herron D, Lu CC, Pechmann T, Pléh C et al. 2003. Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychon Bull Rev. 10:344-380.
8. Bedney M, Caramazza A. 2011. Perception, action and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1224:81-95.
9. Beuchanp H, Martin A. 2007. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex. 43:461-468.
10. Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL. 2009. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex. 19:2767-2796.
11. Bookheimer S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci. 25:151-188.
12. Boronat C, Baxbaum L, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran E, Kimberg D, Detre JA. 2005. Distinctions between manipulation and functional knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Brain Res. 23:361-373.
13. Breier JI, Papanicolaou AC. 2008. Spatiotemporal patterns of brain activation during an action naming task using magnetoencephalogra-phy. J Clin Neurophys. 25:7-112.
14. Butterworth B. 1989. Lexical access in speech production. In: Marslen-Wilson W, editor. Lexical representation and process. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
15. Caramazza A, Miozzo M. 1997. The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: evidence from the 'tip-of-the-tongue' phenomenon. Cognition. 64:309-343.
16. Chao LL, Martin A. 2000. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage. 12:478-484.
17. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Ziegler J, Langdon R. 2001. DRC: a dual route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 108:204-256.
18. Costa A, Strijkers K, Martin C, Thierry G. 2009. The time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 10650:21442-21446.
19. Cree GS, McNorgan C, McRae K. 2006. Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: implications for theories of semantic memory. J Exp Psychol. 32:643-658.
20. Cree GS, McRae K. 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello and many other such concrete nouns. J Exp Psychol. 132:163-201.
21. Damasio H, Tranel D, Grabowski T, Adolphs R, Damasio A Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval 2004. Neural Systems behind Word and Concept Retrieval. Cognition. 92:179-229.
22. Dell GS. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol Rev. 93:283-321.
23. Dell GS, Gordon JK. 2003. Neighbors in the lexicon: friends or foes? In: Schiller NO, Meyer AS, editors. Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: differences and similarities. New York: Mouton.
24. Desimone R. 1996. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:13494-13499.
25. Fischl B, Liu A, Dale AM. 2001. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 20:70-80.
26. Friese U, Supp GG, Hipp JF, Engel AK, Griber T. 2012. Oscillatory MEG gamma band activity dissociates perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual object processing: a combined repetition/conceptual priming study. NeuroImage. 59:861-871.
27. Glaser WR. 1992. Picture naming. Cognition. 42:61-106.
28. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G. 1997. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuro-image. 6:231-236.
29. Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann DA, Strohmeier D, Brod-beck C, Parkkonen L, Hämäläinen MS. 2014. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 86:446-460.
30. Graves WW, Grabowski TJ, Mehta S, Gordon JK. 2007. A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci. 19:617-631.
31. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
32. Hämäläinen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. 1994. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimate. Med Biol Eng Comput. 32:35-42.
33. Harley TA, Brown HE. 1998. What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighborhood effects in speech production. Br J Psychol. 89:151-174.
34. Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermuller F, Marslen-Wilson WD. 2006. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage. 30:1383-1400.
35. Hauk O, Pulvermuller F. 2004. Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 21:191-201.
36. Hauk O, Pulvermuller F, Ford M, Marslen-Wilson WD, Davis MH. 2009. Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG. Biol Psychol. 80:64-74.
37. Hauk O, Wakeman DG, Henson R. 2011. Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics. Neuroinage. 54:1966-1974.
38. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 4:131-138.
39. Hickok G, Poeppel D. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition. 92:67-99.
40. Hulten A, Vihla M, Laine M, Salmelin R. 2009. Accessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language. Hum Brain Mapp. 30:976-989.
41. Indefrey P. 2011. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update. Front Psychol. 2:255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255.
42. Indefrey P, Levelt WJ. 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition. 92:101-144.
43. Jescheniak JD, Schriefers H, Garrett MF, Friederici AD. 2002. Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:951-964.
44. Levelt WJ, Praamstra P, Meyer AS, Helenius P, Salmelin R. 1998. An MEG study of picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci. 10:553-567.
45. Levelt WJ, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci. 22:1-38.
46. Liljestrom M, Hulten A, Parkkonen L, Salmelin R. 2009. Comparing MEG and fMRI views to naming actions and objects. Hum Brain Mapp. 30:1845-1856.
47. Llorens A, Trébuchon A, Liégeois-Chauvel C, Alario F-X. 2011. Intracra-nial recordings of brain activity during language production. Front Psychol. 2:375, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00375.
48. Magnie MN, Besson M, Poncet M, Dolisi C. 2003. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 25:521-560.
49. Martin A. 2007. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu Rev Psychol. 58:25-45.
50. Matsumoto A, Iidaka T. 2008. Gamma band synchronization and the formation of representations in visual word processing: evidence from repetition and homophone priming. J Cogn Neurosc. 20:2088-2096.
51. McRae K, Cree GS, Seidenberg MS, McNorgan C. 2005. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Methods. 37:547-559.
52. Mechelli A, Jospeph O, Lambon Ralph M, McClelland JL, Price CJ. 2007. Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effect during reading and naming. Hum Brain Mapp. 28:205-217.
53. Molins A, Stufflebeam S, Brown E, Hämäläinen M. 2008. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. NeuroImage. 42:1069-1077.
54. Oldfield RC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edimburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:97-113.
55. Pang EW, MacDonald MJ. 2012. A MEG study of the spatiotemporal dynamics of bilinguals verb generation. Brain Res. 1467:56-66.
56. Patterson K, Nestor PJ, Rogers TT. 2007. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 8:976-987.
57. Peramunage D, Blumstein SE, Myers EB, Goldrick M, Baese-Berk M. 2010. Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word production: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 23:593-603.
58. Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard SA, Johnson R Jr, Miller GA, Ritter W, Ruchkin DS, Rugg MD, Taylor MJ. 2000. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 37:127-152.
59. Pulvermuller F, Fadiga L. 2010. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nat Rev Neurosci. 11:351-360.
60. Pulvermuller F, Shtyrov Y, Hauk O. 2009. Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain. Brain Lang. 110:81-94.
61. Pulvermuller F, Shtyrov Y, Ilmoniemi R. 2005. Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:884-892.
62. Rahman RA, Sommer W. 2003. Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence of parallel processing. Cogn Brain Res. 16:372-382.
63. Rapp B, Goldrick M. 2000. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychol Rev. 107:460-499.
64. Rizzolatti G, Sinigaglia C. 2010. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 11:264-274.
65. Rodriguez-Fornells A, Schmitt BM, Kutas M, Munte TF. 2002. Electro-physiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during listening and naming. Neuropsychologia. 40:778-787.
66. Rueschemeyer SA, van Rooij D, Lindemann O, Willems RM, Bekkering H. 2010. The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. J Cogn Neurosci. 22:1844-1851.
67. Saccuman MC, Cappa SF, Bates EA, Arevalo A, Della Rosa P, Danna M, Perani D. 2006. The impact of semantic reference on word class: an fMRI study of action and object naming. Neuroimage. 32:1865-1878.
68. Sahin NT, Pinker S, Cash SS, Schomer D, Halgren E. 2009. Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science. 3265951:445-449.
69. Salmelin R, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Sams M. 1994. Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature. 368:463-465.
70. Schacter DL, Wig GS, Stevens WD. 2007. Reduction in cortical activity during priming. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 17:171-176.
71. Schmitt BM, Munte TF, Kutas M. 2000. Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. Psychophysiology. 37:473-484.
72. Scott SK, Wise RJ. 2004. The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition. 92:13-45.
73. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 6:174-215.
74. Strijkers K, Costa A, Thierry G. 2010. Tracking lexical access in speech produciton: Electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebreal Cortex. 20:912-928.
75. Strijkers K, Holcomb PJ, Costa A. 2011. Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming. J Mem and Lang. 65:345-362.
76. Thorpe S, Delorme A, Marlot C, Thorpe S. 2001. A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. J Cogn Neurosci. 13:171-180.
77. Thorpe S, Fize S, Marlot C. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature. 381:520-522.
78. Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM. 1997. Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. J Exp Psychol. 23:787-806.
79. Turennout M, Hagoort P, Brown CM. 1998. Brain activity during speaking: from syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science. 280:572-574.
80. Tversky A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychol Rev. 84:327-352.
81. Uppenkamp S, Johnsrude IS, Norris D, Marslen-Wilson W, Patterson RD. 2006. Locating the initial stages of speech-sound processing in human temporal cortex. Neuroimage. 31:1284-1296.
82. Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Herve PY, Duffau H, Crivello F, Houde O, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. 2006. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage. 30:1414-1432.
83. Vihla M, Laine M, Salmelin R. 2006. Cortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs. phonological analysis in picture confrontation. Neuroimage. 33:732-738.
84. Vitevitch M. 2002. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. J Exp Psychol. 28:735-747.
85. Wilson SM, Isenberg AL, Hickok G. 2009. Neural correlates of word production stages delineated by parametric modulation of psycho-linguistic variables. Hum Brain Mapp. 30:3596-3608.