Spatiotemporal patterns of brain activation during an action naming task using magnetoencephalography

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-12

  Breier, Joshua I ^a   Papanicolaou, Andrew C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Magnetoencephalography; Naming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOCARDIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 40049111054     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318163ccd5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Amunts K, Weiss PH, Mohlberg H, et al. Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space: the roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45. Neuroimage 2004;1:42-56.
2. Baciu M, Rubin C, Decorps M, Segebarth C. Hemispheric language dominance testing by means of fMRI. J Neuroimaging 1999;4:246-257.
3. Blacker D, Byrnes ML, Mastaglia FL, Thickbroom GW. Differential activation of frontal lobe areas by lexical and semantic language tasks: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Clin Neurosci 2006;1:91-95.
4. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002;151-188.
5. Bowyer SM, Moran JE, Mason KM, et al. MEG localization of language-specific cortex utilizing MR-FOCUSS. Neurology 2004;12:2247-2255.
6. Bright P, Moss H, Tyler LK. Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain Lang 2004;3:417-432.
7. Broca P. Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suives d'une observation d'aphemie. Bull Soc Anat 1861;330-357.
8. Costafreda SG, Fu CH, Lee L, et al. A systematic review and quantitative appraisal of fMRI studies of verbal fluency: role of the left inferior frontal gyrus. Hum Brain Mapp 2006;10:799-810.
9. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179-194.
10. Dale AM, Sereno MI. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci 1993;5:162-176.
11. Damasio H, Grabowski TJ, Tranel D, et al. Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations. Neuroimage 2001;6:1053-1064.
12. Gaillard WD, Hertz-Pannier L, Mott SH, et al. Functional anatomy of cognitive development: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults. Neurology 2000;1:180-185.
13. Hamalainen M. MNE Software Users Guide. Version 2.5 ed. Charlestown, MA: 2006.
14. Hamalainen MS, Ilmoniemi RJ. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994;1:35-42.
15. Harrington GS, Buonocore MH, Farias ST. Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;4:938-944.
16. Heim S, Opitz B, Friederici AD. Distributed cortical networks for syntax processing: Broca's area as the common denominator. Brain Lang 2003;3:402-408.
17. Holland SK, Plante E, Weber Byars A, et al. Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task. Neuroimage 2001;4:837-843.
18. Ilmoniemi RJ. Models of source currents in the brain. Brain Topogr 1993;4:331-336.
19. Kamada K, Sawamura Y, Takeuchi F, et al. Expressive and receptive language areas determined by a non-invasive reliable method using functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Neurosurgery 2007;2:296-305.
20. Kober H, Moller M, Nimsky C, et al. New approach to localize speech relevant brain areas and hemispheric dominance using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 2001;4:236-250.
21. Levelt WJ, Praamstra P, Meyer AS, et al. An MEG study of picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci 1998;5:553-567.
22. Moore CJ, Price CJ. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. Neuroimage 1999;2:181-192.
23. Obler LK, Albert ML. The Action Naming Test. Boston: VA Medical Center; 1979.
24. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;1:97-113.
25. Perani D, Schnur T, Tettamanti M, et al. Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia 1999;3:293-306.
26. Saccuman MC, Cappa SF, Bates EA, et al. The impact of semantic reference on word class: an fMRI study of action and object naming. Neuroimage 2006;4:1865-1878.
27. Salmelin R, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV, Sams M. Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming. Nature 1994;6470:463-465.
28. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987;1:11-22.
29. Soros P, Cornelissen K, Laine M, Salmelin R. Naming actions and objects: cortical dynamics in healthy adults and in an anomic patient with a dissociation in action/object naming. Neuroimage 2003;4:1787-1801.
30. Thierry G, Boulanouar K, Kherif F, et al. Temporal sorting of neural components underlying phonological processing. NeuroReport 1999;12:2599-2603.
31. Uutela K, Hamalainen M, Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. Neuroimage 1999;2:173-180.
32. Vihla M, Laine M, Salmelin R. Cortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs phonological analysis in picture confrontation. Neuroimage 2006;2:732-738.