Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics

NeuroImage

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1966-1974

  Hauk, Olaf ^a   Wakeman, Daniel G ^a   Henson, Richard ^a  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amplitude; Inverse problem; Localization error; Source analysis; Spatial dispersion

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; NEUROIMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 78650210453     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.053     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Backus G.E., Gilbert J.F. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 1968, 16:169-205.
2. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2001, 18(6):14-30.
3. Bertero M., De Mol C., Pike E.R. Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: general formulation and singular system analysis. Inverse Prob. 1985, 1(4):301-330.
4. Dale A.M., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11(2):202-208.
5. Dale A.M., Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1993, 5(2):162-176.
6. Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999, 9(2):179-194.
7. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B.R., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J.W., Lewine J.D., et al. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 2000, 26(1):55-67.
8. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 1999, 9(2):195-207.
9. Fischl B., Liu A., Dale A.M. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2001, 20(1):70-80.
10. Fuchs M., Wagner M., Kohler T., Wischmann H.A. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 16(3):267-295.
11. Goldenholz D.M., Ahlfors S.P., Hamalainen M.S., Sharon D., Ishitobi M., Vaina L.M., et al. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(4):1077-1086.
12. Golub G.H., van Loan C.F. Matrix computations 1996, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. 3 ed.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S., Hauk O., Spinelli L., Michel C.M. A linear inverse solution with optimal resolution properties: WROP. Paper presented at the bv, Graz 1997.
14. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Hauk O., Gonzalez Andino S., Vogt H., Michel C. Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1997, 5(6):454-467.
15. Grave de Peralta R., Hauk O., Gonzalez S.L. The neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem and the zero dipole localization error. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2009, (659247). (Electronic publication ahead of print).
16. Grave de Peralta-Menendez R., Gonzalez-Andino S.L. A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 45:440-448.
17. Greenblatt R.E., Ossadtchi A., Pflieger M.E. Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2005, 53(9):3403-3412.
18. Hämäläinen M.S., Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates of current distributions. Helsinki University of Technology, Technical Report TKK-F-A559 1984.
19. Hämäläinen M.S., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65:413-497.
20. Hauk O. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 2004, 21(4):1612-1621.
21. Hillebrand A., Barnes G.R. A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 2002, 16(3 Pt 1):638-650.
22. Hillebrand A., Singh K.D., Holliday I.E., Furlong P.L., Barnes G.R. A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2005, 25(2):199-211.
23. Ioannides A.A., Muratore R., Balish M., Sato S. In vivo validation of distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem. Brain Topogr. 1993, 5(3):263-273.
24. Lin F.H., Witzel T., Ahlfors S.P., Stufflebeam S.M., Belliveau J.W., Hamalainen M.S. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 2006, 31(1):160-171.
25. Liu A.K., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2002, 16(1):47-62.
26. Lütkenhöner B., Grave de Peralta Menendez R. The resolution-field concept. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 102(4):326-334.
27. Menendez R.G.D.P., Andino S.L.G., Lutkenhoner B. Figures of merit to compare distributed linear inverse solutions. Brain Topogr. 1996, 9(2):117-124.
28. Menke W. Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory 1989, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.
29. Molins A., Stufflebeam S.M., Brown E.N., Hämäläinen M.S. Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation. Neuroimage 2008, 42(3):1069-1077.
30. Pascual-Marqui R.D. Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 24(Suppl D):5-12.
31. Pascual-Marqui R.D., Michel C.M., Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1994, 18(1):49-65.
32. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 1987, 32(1):11-22.
33. Sekihara K., Sahani M., Nagarajan S.S. Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction. Neuroimage 2005, 25(4):1056-1067.
34. Vrba J., Robinson S.E. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 2001, 25(2):249-271.