Perceptions of peer-to-peer interprofessional feedback among students in the health professions

Academic Medicine

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 807-812

  Van Schaik, Sandrijn M ^a,b   Regehr, Glenn ^c,d   Eva, Kevin W ^c,d   Irby, David M ^b   O'Sullivan, Patricia S ^b  

^a Kanbar Center for Simulation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Centre for Health Education Scholarship JPPN3325   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; COOPERATION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH STUDENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PATIENT CARE; PEER GROUP; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC RELATIONS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK; HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PEER GROUP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAN FRANCISCO; STUDENTS, HEALTH OCCUPATIONS;

EID: 84946615575     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000981     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Vol 6. Washington, DC: National Academy Press 2000.
2. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel; 2011.
3. Learning together to work together for health. Report of a WHO study group on multiprofessional education of health personnel: The team approach. WHO Technical Report Series 1988. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1988; 769: 1-72.
4. Rasker PC, Post WM, Schraagen JM. Effects of two types of intra-Team feedback on developing a shared mental model in command & control teams. Ergonomics. 2000; 43: 1167-1189.
5. Willey K, Freeman M. Completing the learning cycle: The role of formative feedback when using self and peer assessment to improve teamwork and engagement. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Creativity, Challenge, Change. Auckland, New Zealand: Australasian Association for Engineering Education; 2006.
6. Blickensderfer E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. In: Beyerlein MM, Johnson DA, eds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. Vol 4. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press 1997: 249-279.
7. Burford B. Group processes in medical education: Learning from social identity theory. Med Educ. 2012; 46: 143-152.
8. Hudson B. Interprofessionality in health and social care: The Achilles? heel of partnership?. J Interprof Care. 2002; 16: 7-17.
9. Reeves S. Using the sociological imagination in the interprofessional field. J Interprof Care. 2011; 25: 317-318.
10. Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008; 50: 540-547.
11. Burke CS, Salas E, Wilson-Donnelly K, Priest H. How to turn a team of experts into an expert medical team: Guidance from the aviation and military communities. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13(suppl 1): i96-i104.
12. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S. Knowledge translation and interprofessional collaboration: Where the rubber of evidencebased care hits the road of teamwork. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26: 46-54.
13. Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach. 2006; 28: e185-e191.
14. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003; 23: 4-12.
15. Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med. 1993; 68: 680-687.
16. Lockyer J, Violato C, Fidler H. Likelihood of change: A study assessing surgeon use of multisource feedback data. Teach Learn Med. 2003; 15: 168-174.
17. Wamsley M, Staves J, Kroon L, et al. The impact of an interprofessional standardized patient exercise on attitudes toward working in interprofessional teams. J Interprof Care. 2012; 26: 28-35.
18. Hean S, Clark JM, Adams K, Humphris D, Lathlean J. Being seen by others as we see ourselves: The congruence between the ingroup and outgroup perceptions of health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care. 2006; 5: 10-22.
19. Tunstall-Pedoe S, Rink E, Hilton S. Student attitudes to undergraduate interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2003; 17: 161-172.
20. Stone N. Evaluating interprofessional education: The tautological need for interdisciplinary approaches. J Interprof Care. 2006; 20: 260-275.
21. Hoffman SJ, Harnish D. The merit of mandatory interprofessional education for pre-health professional students. Med Teach. 2007; 29: e235-e242.
22. Coster S, Norman I, Murrells T, et al. Interprofessional attitudes amongst undergraduate students in the health professions: A longitudinal questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45: 1667-1681.
23. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J. Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents? competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 2004; 79: 458-463.
24. Hesketh E, Anderson F, Bagnall G, et al. Using a 360 degrees diagnostic screening tool to provide an evidence trail of junior doctor performance throughout their first postgraduate year. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 219-233.
25. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, et al. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007; 161: 44.
26. Massagli TL, Carline JD. Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86: 845-852.
27. Ogunyemi D, Gonzalez G, Fong A, et al. From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009; 29: 105-110.
28. Murphy DJ, Bruce D, Eva KW. Workplacebased assessment for general practitioners: Using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 96-103.
29. Meng L, Metro DG, Patel RM. Evaluating professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills: Implementing a 360-degree evaluation instrument in an anesthesiology residency program. J Grad Med Educ. 2009; 1: 216-220.
30. Chandler N, Henderson G, Park B, Byerley J, Brown WD, Steiner MJ. Use of a 360-degree evaluation in the outpatient setting: The usefulness of nurse, faculty, patient/family, and resident self-evaluation. J Grad Med Educ. 2010; 2: 430-434.
31. Garra G, Wackett A, Thode H. Feasibility and reliability of a multisource feedback tool for emergency medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 3: 356-360.
32. Vesel T. Residents? perceptions of interprofessional feedback. Poster presented at: Association of American Medical Colleges Medical Education Meeting; November 6, 2014; Chicago, Ill
33. van Schaik S. Interprofessional feedback between nurses and physicians: In-group versus out-group bias. Talk presented at: Association of American Medical Colleges Medical Education Meeting; November 7, 2014; Chicago, Ill
34. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-Analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119: 254.
35. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007; 77: 81-112.
36. Bainbridge L, Wood VI. The power of prepositions: Learning with, from and about others in the context of interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2012; 26: 452-458.