From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-110

  Ogunyemi, Dotun ^a   Gonzalez, Gustavo ^b   Fong, Alex ^b   Alexander, Carolyn ^b   Finke, David ^b   Donnon, Tyrone ^c   Azziz, Ricardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Continuing; Core competencies; Education; Graduate; Medical; Nurse's assessments; Three hundred sixty degree evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING STAFF; OBSERVATION; PATIENT CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OBSERVATION; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 70349566485     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.20019     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Outcome Project: enhancing residency education through outcomes assessment. www.acgme.org/outcome. Accessed January 2008.
2. Rodger KG, Manifold C. 360-degree feedback: possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency residents. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(11):1300-1304.
3. Higgins RSD, Bridges J, Burke JM, O'Donnell MA, Cohen NM, Wilkes SB. Implementing the ACGME general competencies, in a cardiothoracic residency program using 360-degree feedback. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:12-17.
4. Roark RM, Schaefer SD, Yu GP, Branovan DI, Peterson SJ, Lee WN. Assessing and documenting general competencies in otolaryngology resident training programs. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(5):682-695.
5. Goldstein MJ, Kim E, Widman WD, Hardy MA. A 360 evaluation of a night-float system for general surgery: a response to mandated work-hours reduction. Curr Surg. 2004;61:445-451.
6. Musick DW, McDowell SM, Clark N, Salcido R. Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(5):394-402.
7. Massagli TL, Carline JD. Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(10): 845-852.
8. Wood J, Collins J, Burnside ES, Albanese MA, Propeck PA, Kelcz F, Spilde JM, Schmaltz LM. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills. Acad Radiol. 2004;11(8):931-939.
9. Allerup P, Aspegren K, Ejlersen E, Jørgensen G, Malchow-Møller A, Møller MK, Pedersen KK, Rasmussen OB, Rohold A, Sørensen B. Use of 360-degree assessment of residents in internal medicine in a Danish setting: a feasibility study. Med Teach. 2007;29:166-170.
10. Weigelt JA, Brasel KJ, Bragg D, Simpson D. The 360-degree evaluation: increased work with little return? Curr Surg. 2004;61:616-628.
11. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J. Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 2004;79(5):458-463.
12. Coleman VH, Power ML, Williams S, et al. Continuing professional development: racial and gender differences in obstetrics and gynecology residents' perceptions of mentoring. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;25:268-277.
13. Mpofu DJS, Das M, Stewart T, et al. Perceptions of group dynamics in problem based learning. A time to reflect on issues. Med Teach. 1998;20: 421-427.
14. Wang-Cheng RM, Fulkersopn PK, Barnas GP, et al. Acad Med. 1995; 70:324-326.
15. Coulehan J, Williams PC. Vanquishing virtue: the impact of medical education. Acad Med. 2001;76:598-605.