Workplace-based assessment; Applications and educational impact

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 5-10

  Guraya, Salman Yousuf ^a  

^a TAIBAH UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Facebook; Linkedin; Medical education; Myspace; Social networking sites social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; COWORKER; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER GROUP; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SKILL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDITY; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE; WORKPLACE BASED ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84946568391     PISSN: 1394195X     EISSN: 21804303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teach Educ. 2007;23(3):239-250.
2. Swanwick T, Chana N. Workplace assessment for licensing in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(515):461-467.
3. Swanwick T, Chana N. Workplace-based assessment. BrJ Hosp Med (17508460). 2009;70(5):290-293.
4. Nesbitt A, Baird F, Canning B, Griffin A, Sturrock A. Student perception of workplace-based assessment. Clin teach. 2013;10(6):399-404. doi:10.1111/tct.12057.
5. Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341: c5064. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5064.
6. Boursicot K, Etheridge L, Setna Z, Sturrock A, Ker J, Smee S, et al. Performance in assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):370-383. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.565831.
7. Franche R-L, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607-631. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8.
8. Augustine K, McCoubrie P, Wilkinson J, McKnight L. Workplace-based assessment in radiology—where to now? Clin Radiol. 2010;65(4):325-332. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.
9. Hawkins RE, Margolis MJ, Durning SJ, Norcini JJ. Constructing a validity argument for the mini-clinical evaluation exercise: A review of the research. Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1453-1461. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eac3e6.
10. Nair BR, Alexander HG, McGrath BP, Parvathy MS, Kilsby EC, Wenzel J, et al. The mini clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) for assessing clinical performance of international medical graduates. Med J Aust. 2008;189(3):159-161.
11. Weller J, Jolly B, Misur M, Merry A, Jones A, Crossley JM, et al. Mini-clinical evaluation exercise in anaesthesia training. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(5):633-641. doi:10.1093/bja/aep055.
12. Bindal N, Goodyear H, Bindal T, Wall D. DOPS assessment: A study to evaluate the experience and opinions of trainees and assessors. Med Teach. 2013;35(6):e1230-e1234. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.746447.
13. Pelgrim E, Kramer A, Mokkink H, Van den Elsen L, Grol R, Van der Vleuten C. In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: a literature review. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(1):131-142.
14. Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ. 2008;42(4):364-373. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03010.x.
15. Morris A, Hewitt J, Roberts C. Practical experience of using directly observed procedures, mini clinical evaluation examinations, and peer observation in pre-registration house officer (FY1) trainees. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(966):285-288. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.040477.
16. Pereira EA, Dean BJ. British surgeons’ experiences of mandatory online workplace-based assessment. J R Soc Med. 2009;102(7):287-293. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2009.080398.
17. Brown N, Holsgrove G, Teeluckdharry S. Case-based discussion. Adv Psych Treat. 2011;17(2):85-90.
18. Guraya S, Alzobydi A, Salman S. Objective structured clinical examination: Examiners’ bias and recommendations to improve its reliability. J Med Med Sci. 2010;1:269-272.
19. Jennett PA, Scott SM, Atkinson MA, Crutcher RA, Hogan DB, Elford RW, et al. Patient charts and physician office management decisions: chart audit and chart stimulated recall. J Continuing Educ Health Professions. 1995;15(1):31-39.
20. Norman GR, Davis DA, Lamb S, Hanna E, Caulford P, Kaigas T. Competency assessment of primary care physicians as part of a peer review program. JAMA. 1993;270(9):1046-1051. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510090030007.
21. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226-235. doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
22. Burkill G. Work-based assessment for trainees— more than just a few new tools? Clin Radiol. 2008;63(1):12-14. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.07.014.
23. Archer J, Norcini J, Southgate L, Heard S, Davies H. mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13(2):181-192. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9033-3.
24. Wall D, Singh D, Whitehouse A, Hassell A, Howes J. Self-assessment by trainees using self-TAB as part of the team assessment of behaviour multisource feedback tool. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):165-167. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.644840.
25. Bullock AD, Hassell A, Markham WA, Wall DW, Whitehouse AB. How ratings vary by staff group in multi source feedback assessment of junior doctors. Med Educ. 2009;43(6):516-520. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03333.x.
26. Campbell J, Richards S, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A, Brearley S. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Qualy Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):187-193. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.024679.
27. Wright C, Richards SH, Hill JJ, Roberts MJ, Norman GR, Greco M, et al. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Acad Med. 2012;87(12):1668-1678. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182724cc0.
28. Woods SE, Bivins R, Oteng K, Engel A. The influence of ethnicity on patient satisfaction. Ethn Health. 2005;10(3):235-242.
29. Campbell JL, Roberts M, Wright C, Hill J, Greco M, Taylor M, et al. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors’ professionalism: analysis of survey results. BMJ. 2011;343: d6212. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6212.
30. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 Suppl):S64-S66.
31. Mackillop LH, Crossley J, Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Wade W, Armitage M. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: Does one size fit all? Med Teach. 2011;33(2):e75-e83. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.535870.
32. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Multisource feedback: a method of assessing surgical practice. BMJ. 2003;326(7388):546-548. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7388.546.
33. Brown, C. Multi-source feedback. in: A. Malik, D. Bhugra, A. Brittlebank (Eds.) Workplace-Based Assessments in Psychiatry. The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London; 2011:68-75.
34. Archer J, McGraw M, Davies H. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme. Arch Dis Childd. 2010;95(5):330-335. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.146209.
35. Campbell J, Narayanan A, Burford B, Greco M. Validation of a multi-source feedback tool for use in general practice. Educ Prim Care. 2010;21(3):165-179.
36. Richards SH, Campbell JL, Walshaw E, Dickens A, Greco M. A multi method analysis of free text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires. Med Educ. 2009;43(8):757-766. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03416.x.
37. Archer JC, McAvoy P. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi source feedback. Med Educ. 2011;45(9):886-893. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04023.x.
38. Sabey A, Harris M. Training in hospitals: what do GP specialist trainees think of workplace-based assessments? Educ Prim Care. 2011;22(2):90-99.
39. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):101-108. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x.
40. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29(9-10):855-871.doi:10.1080/01421590701775453.
41. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians’ clinical performance*: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):117-128.doi:10.1080/01421590600622665.
42. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR. Does Performance Improve Following Multisource Feedback? A Theoretical Model, Meta Analysis, And Review Of Empirical Findings. Personnel psychology. 2005;58(1):33-66. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x.
43. Fidler H, Lockyer JM, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians’ practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med. 1999;74(6):702-714.
44. Singh T, Modi JN. Workplace-based assessment: A step to promote competency based postgraduate training. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50(6):553-559.
45. Hill F, Kendall K, Galbraith K, Crossley J. Implementing the undergraduate miniCEX: a tailored approach at Southampton University. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):326-334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03275.x.