Multisource feedback: A method of assessing surgical practice

British Medical Journal

Volumn 326, Issue 7388, 2003, Pages 546-548

  Violato, Claudio ^a   Lockyer, Jocelyn ^a   Fidler, Herta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SURGEON;

EID: 0037425998     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.546     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Southgate L, Hays RB, Norcini J, Mulholland H, Ayers B, Woolliscroft J, et al. Setting performance standards for medical practice: a theoretical framework. Med Educ 2001;35:474-81.
2. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287:226-35.
3. Maudsley RF, Wilson DR, Neufeld VR, Hennen BK, DeVillaer MR, Wakefield J. Educating future physicians for Ontario: phase II. Acad Med 2000;75:113-26.
4. Levine AM. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:243-6.
5. Wilson RM, Harrison BT, Gibberd RW, Hamilton JW. An analysis of adverse events from the quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aust 1999;170:411-5.
6. Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M, eds. To err is human: building a safer health care system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 1999.
7. Violato C, Marini A, Toews J, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Using peers, consulting physicians, patients, co-workers and self to assess physicians. Acad Med 1997;70:57-63.
8. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, Lockyer J, Fidler H, Toews J. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review project. CMAJ 1999;161:52-7.
9. Southgate L, Cox J, David T, Hatch D, Howes A, Johnson N, et al. The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's performance procedures. Med Educ 2001;35(suppl 1):2-8.
10. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. www.acgme.org/Outcome/ (accessed 30 Sept 2002).
11. Societal Needs Working Group. Skills for the new millennium: CanMEDS 2000 project. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 1996;29:206-16.
12. Lipner RS, Blank LL, Leas BF, Fortna GS. The value of patient and peer ratings in recertification. Acad Med 2002;77(10 suppl):S64-6.
13. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-60.
14. Wenrich MD, Carline ID, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 1993;68:680-7.
15. Griffin E, Sanders C, Craven D, King J. A computerized 360° feedback tool for personal and organizational development in general practice. Health Informatics Journal 2000;6:71-80.
16. Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH, eds. The handbook of multisource feedback: the comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
17. Tornow WW, London M, CCL Associates. Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
18. Fidler H, Lockyer J, Toews J, Violato C. Changing physicians' practices: the effect of individual feedback. Acad Med 1999:74:702-14.
19. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. PAR Program. www.par-program.org (accessed 30 Sept 2002).