Workplace-based assessment in radiology-where to now?

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 325-332

  Augustine, K ^a   McCoubrie, P ^a   Wilkinson, J R ^b   McKnight, L ^c  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MORRISTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGIST; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDITY; WORKPLACE; WORKPLACE ASSESSMENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; RADIOLOGY; WORKPLACE;

EID: 77949568345     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. Standards for curricula and assessment systems (2008), Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board, London
2. Davies H., Archer J., Southgate L., et al. Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme. Med Educ 43 (2009) 74-81
3. Wilkinson J.R., Crossley J.G.M., Wragg A., et al. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 42 (2008) 364-373
4. Jolly B.C., Ayers B., Macdonald M.M., et al. The reproducibility of assessing radiological reporting: studies from the development of the General Medical Council's Performance Procedures. Med Educ 35 (2001) 36-44
5. Campbell J.L., Richards S.H., Dickens A., et al. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Qual Saf Health Care 17 (2008) 187-193
6. Burkill G.J.C. Work-based assessment for trainees-more than just a few new tools. Clin Radiol 63 (2008) 12-14
7. Tweed M., and Miola J. Legal vulnerability of assessment tools. Med Teach 23 (2001) 312-314
8. Norcini J.J., and McKinley D.W. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teacher Educ 23 (2007) 239-250
9. van der Vleuten C.P.M., and Schuwirth L.W.T. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 39 (2005) 309-317
10. Norcini J., and Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29 (2007) 855-871
11. Rethans J.J., Norcini J.J., Baron-Maldonado M., et al. The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. Med Educ 36 (2002) 901-909
12. Miller G.E. The assessment of clinical skills competence performance. Acad Med 65 (1990) S63-S67
13. Wilkinson J., and Wade W. New methods of performance assessment for trainees. RCPath Bull 132 (2005) 12-15
14. Downing S.M. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ 38 (2004) 1006-1012
15. McCoubrie P. Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review. Med Teach 26 (2004) 709-712
16. Wass V., Van der Vleuten C., Shatzer J., et al. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357 (2001) 945-949
17. Fish D., and Coles C. Medical education: developing a curriculum for practice (2005), OUP, Maidenhead
18. Schuwirth L.W.T., Southgate L., Page G.G., et al. When enough is enough: a conceptual basis for fair and defensible practice performance assessment. Med Educ 36 (2002) 925-930
19. Davies H., and Howells R. How to assess your specialist registrar. Arch Dis Child 89 (2004) 1089-1093
20. Epstein R.M. Medical education-assessment in medical education. New Engl J Med 356 (2007) 387-396
21. Harding J., and McCoubrie P. Competency-based training versus traditional experience in radiology; how best to educate the radiologists of the future?. Clin Radiol 64 (2009) 569-573
22. Lew S.R., Page G.G., Schuwirth L.W.T., et al. Procedures for establishing defensible programmes for assessing practice performance. Med Educ 36 (2002) 936-941
23. Rowley D.I. The surgeon's job: how should we assess the trainee?. J Roy Soc Med 97 (2004) 363-365
24. Evans R., Elwyn G., and Edwards A. Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. BMJ 328 (2004) 1240-1243
25. Ramsey P.G., Wenrich M.D., Carline J.D., et al. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 269 (1993) 1655-1660
26. Archer J.C., Norcini J., and Davies H.A. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training. BMJ 330 (2005) 1251-1253
27. Archer J., Norcini J., Southgate L., et al. Mini-PAT (peer assessment tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?. Adv Health Sci Educ 13 (2008) 181-192
28. Davies H., Archer J., Bateman A., et al. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training. Med Educ 42 (2008) 1014-1020
29. Murphy D., Bruce D., Mercer S., et al. The reliability of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate medical education and training: a national evaluation in general practice in the United Kingdom. Adv Health Sci Educ 14 (2009) 219-232
30. Crossley J.G.M., Howe A., Newble D., et al. Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL): performance assessment using outpatient letters. Med Educ 35 (2001) 1115-1124
31. Jennett P., and Affleck L. Chart audit and chart stimulated recall as methods of needs assessment in continuing professional health education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 18 (1998) 163-171
32. Norcini J.J. Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work. Med Educ 39 (2005) 880-889
33. Wallis A.G., Isaac A., and McCoubrie P. The Bristol Radiology Report Assessment tool (BRAAT): developing a workplace based assessment tool for radiology reporting skills. BJR Congress Series (2009) 106
34. Driessen E. Are learning portfolios worth the effort? Yes. BMJ 337 (2008) a513
35. Brown N., and Doshi M. Assessing professional and clinical competence: the way forward. Adv Psychiatr Treat 12 (2006) 81-89
36. Norman G. Are learning portfolios worth the effort? No. BMJ 337 (2008) a514
37. Pitts J., Coles C., and Thomas P. Educational portfolios in the assessment of general practice trainers: reliability of assessors. Med Educ 33 (1999) 515-520
38. The Royal College of Radiologists. Standards for radiology discrepancy meetings (2007), The Royal College of Radiologists, London
39. Melvin C., Bodley R., Booth A., et al. Managing errors in radiology: a working model-a reply. Clin Radiol 60 (2005) 275-276
40. McKay J., Murphy D.J., Bowie P., et al. Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses. Qual Saf Health Care 16 (2007) 150-153
41. McCreadie G., and Oliver T.B. Eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol 64 (2009) 491-499
42. Adam J.E. Commentary on eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT. Clin Radiol 64 (2009) 500-501
43. ten Cate O., and Scheele F. Viewpoint: competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice?. Acad Med 82 (2007) 542-547
44. Finucane P.M., Barron S.R., Davies H.A., et al. Towards an acceptance of performance assessment. Med Educ 36 (2002) 959-964
45. Wragg A., Wade W., Fuller G., et al. Assessing the performance of specialist registrars. Clin Med 3 (2003) 131-134
46. Wood J., Collins J., Burnside E.S., et al. Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: a 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills. Acad Radiol 11 (2004) 931-939
47. Williamson K.B., Steele J.L., Gunderman R.B., et al. Assessing radiology resident reporting skills. Radiology 225 (2002) 719-722