A DNA Mini-Barcoding System for Authentication of Processed Fish Products

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Shokralla, Shadi ^a,b   Hellberg, Rosalee S ^c   Handy, Sara M ^d   King, Ian ^a   Hajibabaei, Mehrdad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DNA; PRIMER DNA;

ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; DNA BARCODING; FISH PRODUCT; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; DNA PRIMERS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; FISH PRODUCTS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 84946107648     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep15894     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Woolfe, M. & Primrose, S. Food forensics: using DNA technology to combat misdescription and fraud. Trends Biotechnol 22, 222-226 (2004).
2. Marko, P. B. et al. Fisheries: mislabelling of a depleted reef fish. Nature 430, 309-310 (2004).
3. Hellberg, R. S. & Morrissey, M. T. Advances in DNA-based techniques for the detection of seafood species substitution on the commercial market. J Lab Autom 16, 308-321 (2011).
4. Wong, E. & Hanner, R. DNA barcoding detects market substitution in North American seafood. Food Res Int 41, 828-837 (2008).
5. Wallace, L. et al. DNA barcodes for everyday life: routine authentication of Natural Health Products. Food Res Int 49, 446-452 (2012).
6. Teletchea, F. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 19, 265e293 (2009).
7. Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & deWaard, J. R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270, 313-321 (2003).
8. Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G., Hebert, P. D. & Hickey, D. A. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends Genet 23, 167-172 (2007).
9. Ward, R. D., Zemlak, T. S., Innes, B. H., Last, P. R. & Hebert, P. D. DNA barcoding Australias fish species. Phil Trans R Soc B 360, 1847-1857 (2005).
10. Ward, R. D., Hanner, R. & Hebert, P. D. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74, 329-356 (2009).
11. Hubert, N. et al. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLOS One 3(6), e2490 (2008).
12. Steinke, D., Zemlak, T. S., Gavin, H. & Hebert, P. D. DNA barcoding of Pacific Canadas fishes. Mar Biol 156, 2641-2647 (2009).
13. Nicol S. et al. DNA barcoding as a reliable method for the authentication of commercial seafood products. Food Technol Biotech 50, 387-398 (2012).
14. Handy, S. M. et al. A single laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J AOAC Int 94, 201-210 (2011).
15. Baker, C. S., Lento, G. M., Cipriano, F. & Palumbi, S. R. Predicted decline of protected whales based on molecular genetic monitoring of Japanese and Korean markets. Proc R Soc Lond B 267, 1191-1199 (2000).
16. Shivji, M. et al. Genetic identification of pelagic shark body parts for conservation and trade monitoring. Conserv Biol 16, 1036-1047 (2002).
17. Dawnay, N., Ogden, R., McEwing, R., Carvalho, G. R. & Thorpe, R. S. Validation of the barcoding gene COI for use in forensic genetic species identification. Forensic Sci Int 173, 1-6 (2007).
18. Tanabe, S. et al. PCR method of detecting pork in foods for verifying allergen labeling and for identifying hidden pork ingredients in processed foods. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71, 1663-1667 (2007).
19. Chapela, M. J. et al. Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification. Food Control 18, 1211-5 (2007).
20. Shokralla, S., Singer, G. A. & Hajibabaei, M. Direct PCR amplification and sequencing of specimens DNA from preservative ethanol. Biotechniques 48, 233-234 (2010).
21. Shokralla, S. et al. Pyrosequencing for mini-barcoding of fresh and old museum specimens. PLOS One 6(7), e21252 (2011).
22. Civera, T. Species identification and safety of fish products. Vet Res Commun 27 Suppl 1, 481-489 (2003).
23. Rasmussen-Hellberg, R. S. et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of a real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction method for identification of salmon and trout species in commercial products. J Agric Food Chem 59, 876-884 (2011).
24. Hajibabaei, M. et al. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol Ecol Notes 6, 959-964 (2006).
25. Meusnier, I. et al. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics 9, 214 (2008).
26. Rasmussen, R. S., Morrissey, M. T. & Hebert, P. D. DNA barcoding of commercially important salmon and trout species (Oncorhynchus and Salmo) from North America. J Agric Food Chem 57, 8379-8385 (2009).
27. Ivanova, N., Zemlak, T. S., Hanner, R. H. & Hebert, P. D. Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Notes 7, 544-548 (2007).
28. Hajibabaei, M. et al. Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Phil Trans R Soc B 360, 1959-1967 (2005).
29. Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7, 355-364 (2007).
30. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460-2461 (2010).
31. Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731-2739 (2011).
32. Owczarzy, R. et al. IDT SciTools: a suite for analysis and design of nucleic acid oligomers. Nucleic Acids Res 36, W163-169 (2008).
33. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16, 111-120 (1980).
34. Virgilio, M., Backeljau, T., Nevado, B. & De Meyer, M. Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 206 (2010).
35. Nagy, Z. T., Sonet, G., Glaw, F. & Vences, M. First large-scale DNA barcoding assessment of reptiles in the biodiversity hotspot of Madagascar, based on newly designed COI primers. PLOS One 7(3), e34506 (2012).
36. Van Houdt, J. K., Breman, F. C., Virgilio, M. & De Meyer, M. Recovering full DNA barcodes from natural history collections of Tephritid fruitflies (Tephritidae, Diptera) using mini barcodes. Mol Ecol Resour 10, 459-465 (2010).
37. Gray, S. F. & Evans, R. Dose-response in an outbreak of non-bacterial food poisoning traced to a mixed seafood cocktail. Epidemiol Infect 110, 583-590 (1993).
38. Shokralla, S., Spall, J., Gibson, J. & Hajibabaei, M. Next-generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research. Mol Ecol 21, 1794-1805 (2012).
39. FDA 2013a. Requirements for specific standardized fish and shellfish:, canned tuna. Code of Federal Regulations, 21CFR161.190. Accessed on 12/01/2015. Available at (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr= 161.190)
40. FDA 2013b. Regulatory Fish Encyclopedia: Seafood Species Substitution and Economic Fraud. Accessed on 12/01/2015. Available at: (http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/RFE/ucm071528.htm).
41. FDA 2013c. The Seafood List. Accessed on 12/01/2015. Available at: (http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/ GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Seafood/ucm113260.htm).
42. Espiira, M., Vieites, J. M. & Santaclara, F. J. Development of a genetic method for the identification of salmon, trout, and bream in seafood products by means of PCR-RFLP and FINS methodologies. Eur Food Res Technol 229, 785e793 (2009).
43. Lowenstein, J. H., Amato, G. & Kolokotronis, S. O. The real maccoyii: identifying tuna sushi with DNA barcodes-contrasting characteristic attributes and genetic distances. PLOS One 4(11), e7866 (2009).
44. Rasmussen, R. S. & Morrissey, M. T. DNA-based methods to identify fish and seafood substitution on the commercial market. Compr Rev Food Sci F 8, 118-154 (2009).