Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Virgilio, Massimiliano ^a,b   Backeljau, Thierry ^b,c   Nevado, Bruno ^b   De Meyer, Marc ^a  

^a ROYAL MUSEUM FOR CENTRAL AFRICA   (Belgium)

^b ROYAL BELGIAN INSTITUTE OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE; CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE; DNA BARCODING; IDENTIFICATION CRITERION; LARGE DATABASE; REFERENCE DATABASE; TARGET SPECIES; TYPE II ERROR;

BAR CODES; ERRORS; QUERY LANGUAGES; QUERY PROCESSING;

DNA;

COLEOPTERA; DIPTERA; HEMIPTERA; HEXAPODA; HYMENOPTERA; LEPIDOPTERA; ORTHOPTERA;

DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INSECT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; INSECTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77951224779     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-206     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1994, 3:294-299.
2. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc B 2003, 270:313-321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218, 1691236, 12614582.
3. Ratnasingham S, Hebert P. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol Ecol Notes 2007, 7:355-364. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x, 1890991, 18784790., http://www.barcodinglife.org
4. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PKL. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol 2006, 55:715-728. 10.1080/10635150600969864, 17060194.
5. Meier R, Zhang G, Ali F. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the barcoding gap and leads to misidentification. Syst Biol 2008, 57:809-813. 10.1080/10635150802406343, 18853366.
6. Munch K, Boomsma W, Huelsenbeck JP, Willerslev E, Nielsen R. Statistical assignment of DNA sequences using Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst Biol 2008, 57:750-757. 10.1080/10635150802422316, 18853361.
7. Little DP, Stevenson DW. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics 2007, 23:1-21.
8. Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:14812-14817. 10.1073/pnas.0406166101, 522015, 15465915.
9. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e312. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312, 518999, 15455034.
10. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 2005, 54:852-859. 10.1080/10635150500354886, 16243770.
11. Smith MA, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Deans AR, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:12359-12364. 10.1073/pnas.0805319105, 2518452, 18716001.
12. Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:968-971. 10.1073/pnas.0510466103, 1327734, 16418261.
13. Funk DJ, Omland KE. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2003, 34:397-423.
14. Whitworth TL, Dawson RD, Magalon H, Baudry E. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc R Soc B 2007, 274:1731-1739. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0062, 2493573, 17472911.
15. Foottit RG, Adler PH, . Eds Insect biodiversity, science and society. 2009, Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, Eds.
16. Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butterflies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:6350-6355. 10.1073/pnas.0712181105, 2359806, 18436645.
17. Fisher BL, Smith MA. A revision of Malagasy species of Anochetus Mayr and Odontomachus Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1787. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001787, 2387237, 18509544.
18. Greenstone MH, Rowley DL, Heimbach U, Lundgren JG, Pfannenstiel RS, Rehner SA. Barcoding generalist predators by polymerase chain reaction: carabids and spiders. Mol Ecol 2005, 14:3247-3266. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02628.x, 16101789.
19. Smith MA, Wood DM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:4967-4972. 10.1073/pnas.0700050104, 1821123, 17360352.
20. Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:3657-3662. 10.1073/pnas.0511318103, 1383497, 16505365.
21. Elias M, Hill RI, Willmott KR, Dasmahapatra KK, Brower AVZ, Malllet J, Jiggins CD. Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proc R Soc B 2007, 274:2881-2889. 10.1098/rspb.2007.1035, 17785265.
22. Trewick SA. DNA Barcoding is not enough: mismatch of taxonomy and genealogy in New Zealand grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Cladistics 2007, 23:1-5.
23. Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 2009, 74:329-356.
24. Ross HA, Murugan S, Sibon Li WL. Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 2008, 57:216-230. 10.1080/10635150802032990, 18398767.
25. Hajibabaei M, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Hebert PDN. A minimalist barcode can identify a specimen whose DNA is degraded. Mol Ecol Notes 2006, 6:959-964.
26. Meusnier I, Singer G, Landry J-F, Hickey D, Hebert P, Hajibabaei M. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:214. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-214, 2396642, 18474098.
27. Cameron S, Rubinoff D, Will K. Who will actually use DNA barcoding and what will it cost?. Syst Biol 2006, 55:844-847. 10.1080/10635150600960079, 17060204.
28. Farris JS, Albert VA, Källersjö M, Lipscomb D, Klug AG. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms Neighbor-joining. Cladistics 1996, 12:99-124.
29. Backeljau T, De Bruyn L, De Wolf H, Jordaens K. Multiple UPGMA and Neighbor-joining trees and the performance of some computer packages. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:309-313.
30. Meier R. DNA sequences in taxonomy, opportunities and challenges. The new taxonomy 2008, 95-128. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Wheeler QD.
31. Aliabadian M, Kaboli M, Nijman V, Vences M. Molecular identification of birds: performance of distance-based DNA barcoding in three genes to delimit parapatric species. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4119. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004119, 2612741, 19127298.
32. Moritz C, Cicero C. DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e354. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354, 519004, 15486587.
33. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41:95-98.
34. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120. 10.1007/BF01731581, 7463489.
35. Swofford DL. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
36. Underwood AJ. Experiments in ecology 1997, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 1995, New York: Freeman Press.
38. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society series B-statistical methodology 1995, 57:289-300.