Roe deer at risk: Teasing apart habitat selection and landscape constraints in risk exposure at multiple scales

Oikos

Volumn 124, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1536-1546

  Padié, Sophie ^a   Morellet, Nicolas ^b   Hewison, A J Mark ^b   Martin, Jean Louis ^a   Bonnot, Nadège ^b   Cargnelutti, Bruno ^b   Chamaillé Jammes, Simon ^a  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HABITAT SELECTION; HUNTING; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; PREDATOR; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; REFUGE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMALIA; CAPREOLUS;

EID: 84945453852     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.02115     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Abbas, F. et al. 2013. A typical browser, the roe deer, may consume substantial quantities of grasses in open landscapes. - Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 59: 69-75.
2. Andersen, R. et al. 1998. The european roe deer: a portrait of a successful species. - In: Andersen, R. et al. (eds), The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ. Press, pp. 11-22.
3. Basille, M. et al. 2013. Selecting habitat to survive: the impact of road density on survival in a large carnivore. - PLoS ONE 8: e65493.
4. Benhaiem, S. et al. 2008. Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. - Anim. Behav. 76: 611-618.
5. Benton, T. G. et al. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182-188.
6. Berger, J. et al. 2001. Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. - Science 291: 1036-1039.
7. Biro, P. A. et al. 2014. Individual and sex-specific differences in intrinsic growth rate covary with consistent individual differences in behaviour. - J. Anim. Ecol. 83: 1186-1195.
8. Bivand, R. and Rundel, C. 2013. Rgeos: interface to geometry engine - open source (GEOS). - < http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgeos>.
9. Bivand, R. et al. 2011. Rgdal: bindings for the geospatial data abstraction library. in - R package ver. 07.-4. < http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal>.
10. Bjørneraas, K. et al. 2010. Screening global positioning system location data for errors using animal movement characteristics. - J. Wildl. Manage. 74: 1361-1366.
11. Bonnot, N. et al. 2013. Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer. - Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 59: 185-193.
12. Bonnot, N. et al. 2015. Inter-individual variability in habitat use: evidence for a risk management syndrome in roe deer ? - Behav. Ecol. 26: 105-114.
13. Broseth, H. and Pedersen, H. C. 2000. Hunting effort and game vulnerability studies on a small scale: a new technique combining radio-telemetry, GPS and GIS. - J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 182-190.
14. Broström, G. et al. 2011. glmmML: generalized linear models with clustering. - R package ver. 0.82-1. < http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmmML>.
15. Brown, J. S. 1999. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection : foraging under predation risk. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 49-71.
16. Brown, J. S. and Kotler, B. P. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. - Ecol. Lett. 7: 999-1014.
17. Brown, J. S. et al. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory and trophic interactions. - J. Mammal. 80: 385-399.
18. Cagnacci, F. et al. 2011. Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioural gradient determined by ecological factors. - Oikos 120: 1790-1802.
19. Calenge, C. 2006. The package "adehabitat" for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. - Ecol. Modell. 197: 516-519.
20. Calenge, C. et al. 2005. K-select analysis: a new method to analyse habitat selection in radio-tracking studies. - Ecol. Modell. 186: 143-153.
21. Caro, T. 2005. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. - Univ. of Chicago Press.
22. Chamaillé-Jammes, S. and Blumstein, D. T. 2012. A case for quantile regression in behavioral ecology: getting more out of flight initiation distance data. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66: 985-992.
23. Ciuti, S. et al. 2012a. Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear. - PLoS ONE 7: e50611.
24. Ciuti, S. et al. 2012b. Human selection of elk behavioural traits in a landscape of fear. - Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 4407-4416.
25. Creel, S. et al. 2005. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. - Ecology 86: 3387-3397.
26. Cresswell, W. et al. 2010. Predator-hunting success and prey vulnerability: quantifying the spatial scale over which lethal and non-lethal effects of predation occur. - J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 556-562.
27. Cromsigt, J. P. G. M. et al. 2013. Hunting for fear: innovating management of human-wildlife conflicts. - J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 544-549.
28. Crooks, K. R. and Soulé, M. E. 1999. Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. - Nature 400: 563-566.
29. Davino, C. et al. 2013. Quantile regression: theory and applications. - Wiley.
30. De Naugle et al. 1997. Effects of hunting and loss of escape cover on movements and activity of female white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. - Can. Field-Nat. 111: 595-600.
31. Decesare, N. J. et al. 2014. Linking habitat selection and predation risk to spatial variation in survival. - J. Anim. Ecol. 83: 343-352.
32. Dussault, C. et al. 2005. Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors. - Ecography 28: 619-628.
33. Dussault, C. et al. 2012. Avoidance of roads and selection for recent cutovers by threatened caribou: fitness-rewarding or maladaptive behaviour? - Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 4481-4488.
34. Gaillard, J.-M. et al. 2010. Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2255-2265.
35. Geraci, M. 2014. Linear quantile mixed models: the lqmm package for Laplace quantile regression. - J. Stat. Softw. 57: 1-29.
36. Godvik, I. M. R. et al. 2009. Temporal scales, tradeoffs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. - Ecology 90: 699-710.
37. Grignolio, S. et al. 2011. Effects of hunting with hounds on a non-target species living on the edge of a protected area. - Biol. Conserv. 144: 641-649.
38. Ford, A. T. et al. 2014. Large carnivores make savanna tree community less thorny. - Science 346: 346-349.
39. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 1996. Annual variation in body composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in moderate environmental conditions. - Can. J. Zool. 74: 245-253.
40. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 1998. Social organization of European roe deer. - In: Andersen, R. et al. (eds), The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ. Press, pp. 189-219.
41. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 1999. Tests of estimation of age from tooth wear on roe deer of known age: variation within and among populations. - Can. J. Zool. 77: 58-67.
42. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 2001. The effects of woodland fragmentation and human activity on roe deer distribution in agricultural landscapes. - Can. J. Zool. 79: 679-689.
43. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 2007. Using radio-tracking and direct observation to estimate roe deer Capreolus capreolus density in a fragmented landscape: a pilot study. - Wildl. Biol. 13: 313-320.
44. Hewison, A. J. M. et al. 2009. Landscape fragmentation influences winter body mass of roe deer. - Ecography 32: 1062-1070.
45. Hof, A. R. et al. 2012. Food or fear? Predation risk mediates edge refuging in an insectivorous mammal. - Anim. Behav. 83: 1099-1106.
46. Jarnemo, A. and Wikenros, C. 2013. Movement pattern of red deer during drive hunts in Sweden. - Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 60: 77-84.
47. Kilgo, J. C. et al. 1998. Influences of hunting on the behavior of white-tailed deer: implications for conservation of the Florida panther. - Conserv. Biol. 12: 1359-1364.
48. Kufeld, R. C. et al. 1988. Influence of hunting on movements of female mule deer. - J. Range. Manage. 41: 70-72.
49. Lebel, F. et al. 2012. Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white-tailed deer harvest. - J. Wildl. Manage. 76: 1431-1440.
50. Le Saout, S. et al. 2014. Short-term effect of hunting on naïve black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis): behavioral response and consequences on vegetation growth. - Can. J. Zool. 92: 915-925.
51. Lima, S. L. and Dill, L. M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. - Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
52. Loehr, J. et al. 2005. Gender- and age-class-specific reactions to human disturbance in a sexually dimorphic ungulate. - Can. J. Zool. 83: 1602-1607.
53. Lone, K. et al. 2014. Living and dying in a multi-predator landscape of fear: roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans. - Oikos 123: 641-651.
54. McLoughlin, P. D. M. et al. 2005. Relating predation mortality to broad-scale habitat selection. - J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 701-707.
55. Mitchell, W. A. and Lima, S. L. 2002. Predator-prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey. - Oikos 99: 249-259.
56. Morellet, N. et al. 2011. Landscape composition influences roe deer habitat selection at both home range and landscape scales. - Landscape Ecol. 26: 999-1010.
57. Morellet, N. et al. 2013. Seasonality, weather and climate affect home range size in roe deer across a wide latitudinal gradient within Europe. - J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 1326-1339.
58. Mysterud, A. and Ims, R. A. 1998. Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in tradeoff situations. - Ecology 79: 1435-1441.
59. Pebesma, E. and Bivand, R. 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. - R News 5: 9-13.
60. Preisser, E. L. et al. 2005. Scared to death ? The effect of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. - Ecology 86: 501-509.
61. Proffitt, K. M. et al. 2009. Contrasting effects of wolves and human hunters on elk behavioral responses to predation risk. - J. Wildl. Manage. 73: 345-356.
62. Reebs, S. G. 1999. Time-place learning based on food but not on predation risk in a fish, the Inanga (Galaxias maculatus). - Ethology 105: 361-371.
63. Rettie, W. J. and Messier, F. 2000. Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. - Ecography 23: 466-478.
64. Saïd, S. et al. 2012. Sex effect on habitat selection in response to hunting disturbance: the study of wild boar. - Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58: 107-115.
65. Searle, K. R. et al. 2008. When foraging and fear meet: using foraging hierarchies to inform assessments of landscapes of fear. - Behav. Ecol. 19: 475-482.
66. Sih, A. 2013. Predator-prey space use as an emergent outcome of a behavioral response race. - In: Barbosa, P. and Castellanos, I. (eds), Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 240-255.
67. Sönnichsen, L. et al. 2013. Behavioural responses of European roe deer to temporal variation in predation risk. - Ethology 119: 233-243.
68. Spencer, W. D. 2012. Home ranges and the value of spatial information. - J. Mammal. 93: 929-947.
69. Tolon, V. et al. 2009. Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear. - Can. J. Zool. 87: 1129-1137.
70. Warton, D. and Aarts, G. 2013. Advancing our thinking in presence-only and used-available analysis. - J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 1125-1134.
71. Williams, S. C. et al. 2008. Behavioral responses of white-tailed deer subjected to lethal management. - Can. J. Zool. 86: 1358-1366.
72. Williams, S. C. et al. 2013. Evaluation of organized hunting as a management technique for overabundant white-tailed deer in suburban landscapes. - Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37: 137-145.
73. Wirsing, A. J. et al. 2010. Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode. - Anim. Behav. 79: 531-537.
74. Wojdak, J. M. 2009. Foraging and refuge use by a pond snail: effects of physiological state, predators and resources. - Acta Oecol. 35: 746-751.
75. Zanette, L. Y. et al. 2011. Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. - Science 334: 1398-401.