Short-term effects of hunting on naive black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis): Behavioural response and consequences on vegetation growth

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 92, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 915-925

  Le Saout, Soizic ^a,b   Padie, Sophie ^a,b   Chamaille Jammes, Simon ^a   Chollet, Simon ^a,b   Cote, Steve ^c   Morellet, Nicolas ^d   Pattison, Jake ^e   Harris, Erin ^e   Martin, Jean Louis ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c CENTRE D ÉTUDES NORDIQUES   (Canada)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e Laskeek Bay Conservation Society Office   (Canada)

Author keywords

Black tailed deer; Ecology of fear; Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis; Predation risk; Trophic cascade

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ADAPTATION; BAIT; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DEER; HUNTING; ISLAND; VEGETATION COVER;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS;

ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS COLUMBIANUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS SITKENSIS;

EID: 84909946748     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: 14803283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2014-0122     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Allombert, S., Stockton, S., and Martin, J.-L. 2005. A natural experiment on the impact of overabundant deer on forest invertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 19(6): 1917-1929. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00280.x.
2. Augustine, D.J., and McNaughton, S.J. 1998. Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J. Wildl. Manage. 62(4): 1165. doi:10.2307/3801981.
3. Beale, C.M., and Monaghan, P. 2004. Behavioural responses to human disturbance: a matter of choice? Anim. Behav. 68(5): 1065-1069. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.002.
4. Beguin, J., Pothier, D., and Cote, S.D. 2011. Deer browsing and soil disturbance induce cascading effects on plant communities: a multilevel path analysis. Ecol. Appl. 21(2): 439-451. doi:10.1890/09-2100.1. PMID:21563575.
5. Benhaiem, S., Delon, M., Lourtet, B., Cargnelutti, B., Aulagnier, S., Hewison, A.J.M., Morellet, N., and Verheyden, H. 2008. Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection. Anim. Behav. 76(3): 611-618. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.012.
6. Berger, J., Swenson, J.E., and Persson, I.L. 2001. Recolonizing carnivores and naive prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science, 291(5506): 1036-1039. doi:10.1126/science.1056466. PMID:11161215.
7. Beschta, R.L., and Ripple, W.J. 2007. Wolves, elk, and aspen in the winter range of Jasper National Park, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 37(10): 1873-1885. doi:10.1139/X07-017.
8. Beschta, R.L., and Ripple, W.J. 2010. Mexican wolves, elk, and aspen in Arizona: is there a trophic cascade? For. Ecol. Manage. 260(5): 915-922. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.012.
9. Biro, P.A., and Dingemanse, N.J. 2009. Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24(2): 66-67. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.001. PMID:19110338.
10. Bonnot, N., Morellet, N., Verheyden, H., Cargnelutti, B., Lourtet, B., Klein, F., and Hewison, A.J.M. 2013. Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 59(2): 185-193. doi:10.1007/s10344-012-0665-8.
11. Brown, J., Laundre, J., and Gurung, M. 1999. The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J. Mammal. 80(2): 385-399. doi: 10.2307/1383287.
12. Callan, R., Nibbelink, N.P., Rooney, T.P., Wiedenhoeft, J.E., and Wydeven, A.P. 2013. Recolonizing wolves trigger a trophic cascade in Wisconsin (USA). J. Ecol. 101(4): 837-845. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12095.
13. Carter, A.J., Heinsohn, R., Goldizen, A.W., and Biro, P.A. 2012. Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards. Anim. Behav. 83(4): 1051-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.033.
14. Carthey, A.J.R., and Banks, P.B. 2014. Naivete in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence. Biol. Rev. [Online ahead of print.] doi:10.1111/brv.12087.
15. Chollet, S. 2012. De la mise en evidence à la gestion de l’effet de cerf : lecons pratiques et theoriques fournies par l’introduction du cerf à queue-noire sur Haida Gwaii. Ph.D. thesis, Universite Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. Available from https://db.tt/SXmhykcu[accessed 2 September 2014].
16. Chollet, S., Baltzinger, C., Ostermann, L., Saint-Andre, F., and Martin, J.-L. 2013. Importance for forest plant communities of refuges protecting from deer browsing. For. Ecol. Manage. 289: 470-477. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.043.
17. Chollet, S., Baltzinger, C., Le Saout, S., and Martin, J.-L. 2014. A better world for bryophytes? A rare and overlooked case of positive community-wide effects of browsing by overabundant deer. Ecoscience, 20(4): 352-360. doi:10.2980/20-4-3627.
18. Ciuti, S., Muhly, T.B., Paton, D.G., McDevitt, A.D., Musiani, M., and Boyce, M.S. 2012a. Human selection of elk behavioural traits in a landscape of fear. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279(1746): 4407-4416. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1483.
19. Ciuti, S., Northrup, J.M., Muhly, T.B., Simi, S., Musiani, M., Pitt, J.A., and Boyce, M.S. 2012b. Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear. PLoS ONE, 7(11): e50611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050611. PMID:23226330.
20. Cleveland, S.M., Hebblewhite, M., Thompson, M., and Henderson, R. 2012. Linking elk movement and resource selection to hunting pressure in a heterogeneous landscape. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 36(4): 658-668. doi:10.1002/wsb.182.
21. Cote, S.D., Rooney, T.P., Tremblay, J.-P., Dussault, C., and Waller, D.M. 2004. Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 113-147. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105725.
22. Creel, S., and Christianson, D. 2008. Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(4): 194-201. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.004. PMID:18308423.
23. Creel, S., Winnie, J.A., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., and Creel, M. 2005. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology, 86(12): 3387-3397. doi:10.1890/05-0032.
24. Creel, S., Christianson, D., Liley, S., and Winnie, J.A. 2007. Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk. Science, 315(5814): 960. doi:10.1126/science.1135918. PMID:17303746.
25. Creel, S., Schuette, P., and Christianson, D. 2014. Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behav. Ecol. 25(4): 773-784. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru050.
26. Cribari-Neto, F., and Zeileis, A. 2010. Beta regression in R. J. Stat. Softw. 34(2).
27. Cromsigt, J.P.G.M., Kuijper, D.P.J., Adam, M., Beschta, R.L., Churski, M., Eycott, A., Kerley, G.I.H., Mysterud, A., Schmidt, K., and West, K. 2013. Hunting for fear: innovating management of human-wildlife conflicts. J. Appl. Ecol. 50(3): 544-549. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12076.
28. Darimont, C.T., Carlson, S.M., Kinnison, M.T., Paquet, P.C., Reimchen, T.E., and Wilmers, C.C. 2009. Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(3): 952-954. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809235106. PMID:19139415.
29. Ebersole, R.L. 2006. Efficacy of a controlled hunt for managing white-tailed deer on Fair Hill Natural Resource Management Area, Cecil County, Maryland. Master’s thesis, Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, Newark.
30. Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Duchesne, T., and Mao, J.S. 2005. Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone national park. Ecology, 86(5): 1320-1330. doi:10.1890/04-0953.
31. Fournier, D.A., Skaug, H.J., Ancheta, J., Ianelli, J., Magnusson, A., Maunder, M.N., Nielsen, A., and Sibert, J. 2012. AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim. Methods Softw. 27(2): 233-249. doi:10.1080/10556788.2011.597854.
32. Fox, J., and Weisberg, S. 2011. An R companion to applied regression. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
33. Frair, J.L., Merrill, E.H., Allen, J.R., and Boyce, M.S. 2007. Know thy enemy: experience affects elk translocation success in risky landscapes. J. Wildl. Manage. 71(2): 541-554. doi:10.2193/2006-141.
34. Garrott, R.A., White, P.J., and Vanderbilt White, C.A. 1993. Overabundance: an issue for conservation biologists? Conserv. Biol. 7(4): 946-949. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740946.x.
35. Goldthorpe, G., and Neo, S.H. 2011. A preliminary investigation into the effects of hunting on three large ungulate species in peninsular Malaysia, with implications for tiger conservation. Malayan Nat. J. 63(3): 549-560.
36. Golumbia, T.E., Bland, L., Moore, K. and Bartier, P. 2008. History and current status of introduced vertebrates on Haida Gwaii. In Lessons from the islands: introduced species and what they tell us about how ecosystems work. Edited by A.J. Gaston, T.E. Golumbia, J.-L. Martin, and S. Sharpe. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Gatineau, Que. pp. 8-31.
37. Heithaus, M.R., Frid, A., Wirsing, A.J., Dill, L.M., Fourqurean, J.W., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., and Bejder, L. 2007. State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. J. Anim. Ecol. 76(5): 837-844. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01260.x. PMID:17714261.
38. Holt, C.A., Fuller, R.J., and Dolman, P.M. 2011. Breeding and post-breeding responses of woodland birds to modification of habitat structure by deer. Biol. Conserv. 144(9): 2151-2162. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.004.
39. Hommel, G. 1988. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika, 75(2): 383-386. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.2.383.
40. Jayakody, S., Sibbald, A.M., Gordon, I.J., and Lambin, X. 2008. Red deer Cervus elephus vigilance behaviour differs with habitat and type of human disturbance. Wildl. Biol. 14(1): 81-91. doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[81:RDCEVB]2.0.CO;2.
41. Kelley, J.L., and Magurran, A.E. 2003. Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish Fish. 4(3): 216-226. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2003.00126.x.
42. Kilpatrick, H.J., Spohr, S.M., and Chasko, G.G. 1997. A controlled deer hunt on a state-owned coastal reserve in Connecticut: controversies, strategies, and results. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25(2): 451-456. doi:10.2307/3783473.
43. Kuijper, D.P.J., de Kleine, C., Churski, M., van Hooft, P., Bubnicki, J., and Jedrzejewska, B. 2013. Landscape of fear in Europe: wolves affect spatial patterns of ungulate browsing in Białowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Ecography, 36(12): 1263-1275. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00266.x.
44. Laundre, J., Hernandez, L., and Altendorf, K.B. 2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the “landscape of fear” in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Can. J. Zool. 79(8): 1401-1409. doi:10.1139/z01-094.
45. Le Saout, S. 2013. Understanding high densities of deer in a heavily browsed habitat: a study on food and fear in Sitka black-tailed deer. Ph.D. thesis, Universite Montpellier II, Montpellier, France. Available from http://tel.archivesouvertes.fr/tel-01022966 [accessed 2 September 2014].
46. Le Saout, S., Chollet, S., Chamaille-Jammes, S., Blanc, L., Padie, S., Verchere, T., Gaston, A.J., Gillingham, M.P., Gimenez, O., Parker, K.L., Picot, D., Verheyden, H., and Martin, J.-L. 2014. Understanding the paradox of deer persisting at high abundance in heavily browsed habitats. Wildl. Biol. 20(3): 122-135. doi:10.2981/wlb.13048.
47. Lima, S.L., and Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68(4): 619-640. doi:10.1139/z90-092.
48. Martin, J.G.A., and Reale, D. 2008. Animal temperament and human disturbance: implications for the response of wildlife to tourism. Behav. Processes, 77(1): 66-72. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.004.
49. Martin, J.-L., and Baltzinger, C. 2002. Interaction among deer browsing, hunting, and tree regeneration. Can. J. For. Res. 32(7): 1254-1264. doi:10.1139/X02-043.
50. Martin, J.-L., Stockton, S., Allombert, S., and Gaston, A.J. 2010. Top-down and bottom-up consequences of unchecked ungulate browsing on plant and animal diversity in temperate forests: lessons from a deer introduction. Biol. Invasions, 12(2): 353-371. doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9628-8.
51. McShea, W.J. 2012. Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1249(1): 45-56. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06376.x. PMID:22268688.
52. McTaggart-Cowan, I. 1956. Life and times of the coast black-tailed deer. In The deer of North America. Edited by W.P. Taylor. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pa. pp. 334-359.
53. Milner, J.M., Nilsen, E.B., and Andreassen, H.P. 2007. Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conserv. Biol. 21(1), 36-47. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00591.x.
54. Mitchell, M.D., McCormick, M.I., Ferrari, M.C.O., and Chivers, D.P. 2011. Coral reef fish rapidly learn to identify multiple unknown predators upon recruitment to the reef. PLoS ONE, 6(1): e15764. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015764. PMID:21249216.
55. Mysterud, A. 2011. Selective harvesting of large mammals: how often does it result in directional selection? J. Appl. Ecol. 48(4): 827-834. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02006.x.
56. Nugent, G., McShea, W.J., Parkes, J., Woodley, S., Waithaka, J., Moro, J., Gutierrez, R., Azorit, C., Medez Guerrero, F., Flueck, W.T., and Smith-Flueck, J.M. 2011. Policies and management of overabundant deer (native or exotic) in protected areas. Anim. Prod. Sci. 51(4): 384-389. doi:10.1071/AN10288.
57. Orrock, J.L., Preisser, E.L., Grabowski, J.H., and Trussell, G.C. 2013. The cost of safety: refuges increase the impact of predation risk in aquatic systems. Ecology, 94(3): 573-579. doi:10.1890/12-0502.1. PMID:23687883.
58. Poilve, E. 2013. Etude du regime alimentaire de populations de cerfs à queue noire (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis) de l’archipel Haida Gwaii. M.Sc. thesis, Universite de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
59. Pojar, J. 2008. An introduction to the plant ecology of Haida Gwaii. In Lessons from the islands: introduced species and what they tell us about how ecosystems work. Edited by A.J. Gaston, T.E. Golumbia, J.-L. Martin, and S. Sharpe. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Gatineau, Que. pp. 3-7.
60. Pojar, J., Lewis, T., Roemer, H., and Wilford, D.J. 1980. Relationships between introduced black-tailed deer and the plant life of the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia. Research Branch, Ministry of Forests, Smithers, B.C.
61. Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., and Benard, M.F. 2005. Scared to death? The effect of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 86(2): 501-509. doi:10.1890/04-0719.
62. Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., and Grabowski, J.H. 2009. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey. Ecol. Lett. 12(4): 315-323. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01290.x. PMID:19243407.
63. Proffitt, K.M., Grigg, J.L., Hamlin, K.L., and Garrott, R.A. 2009. Contrasting effects of wolves and human hunters on elk behavioral responses to predation risk. J. Wildl. Manage. 73(3): 345-356. doi:10.2193/2008-210.
64. Quinn, J.L., and Cresswell, W. 2005. Personality, anti-predation behaviour and behavioural plasticity in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour, 142(9-10): 1377-1402. doi:10.1163/156853905774539391.
65. R Development Core Team. 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.15.0 [computer program]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www.r-project.org [accessed 15 October 2014].
66. Reale, D., Dingemanse, N.J., Kazem, A.J.N., and Wright, J. 2010. Evolutionary and ecological approaches to the study of personality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365(1560): 3937-3946. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0222.
67. Reimoser, F. 2003. Steering the impacts of ungulates on temperate forests. J. Nat. Conserv. 10(4): 243-252. doi:10.1078/1617-1381-00024.
68. Ripple, W.J., and Beschta, R.L. 2003. Wolf reintroduction, predation risk, and cottonwood recovery in Yellowstone National Park. For. Ecol. Manage. 184(1-3): 299-313. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00154-3.
69. Ripple, W.J., and Beschta, R.L. 2006. Linking wolves to willows via risk-sensitive foraging by ungulates in the northern Yellowstone ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage. 230(1-3): 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.023.
70. Ripple, W.J., Beschta, R.L., Fortin, J.K., and Robbins, C.T. 2014. Trophic cascades from wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone. J. Anim. Ecol. 83(1): 223-233. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12123. PMID:24033136.
71. Rutberg, A.T. 1997. The science of deer management: an animal welfare perspective. In The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Edited by W.J. McShea, H.B. Underwood, and J.H. Rappole. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 37-54.
72. Scillitani, L., Monaco, A., and Toso, S. 2010. Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56(3): 307-318. doi:10.1007/s10344-009-0314-z.
73. Simard, M.A., Dussault, C., Huot, J., and Cote, S.D. 2013. Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach. J. Wildl. Manage. 77(2): 254-269. doi:10.1002/jwmg.477.
74. Stankowich, T. 2008. Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 141(9): 2159-2173. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008. 06.026.
75. Stockton, S.A., Allombert, S., Gaston, A.J., and Martin, J.-L. 2005. A natural experiment on the effects of high deer densities on the native flora of coastal temperate rain forests. Biol. Conserv. 126(1): 118-128. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.006.
76. Takatsuki, S. 2009. Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: a review. Biol. Conserv. 142(9): 1922-1929. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.011.
77. Tanentzap, A.J., Kirby, K.J., and Goldberg, E. 2012. Slow responses of ecosystems to reductions in deer (Cervidae) populations and strategies for achieving recovery. For. Ecol. Manage. 264(6): 159-166. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.005.
78. Thompson, M.J., and Henderson, R.E. 1998. Elk habituation as a credibility challenge for wildlife professionals. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26(3): 477-483.
79. Tolon, V., Dray, S., Loison, A., Zeileis, A., Fischer, C., and Baubet, E. 2009. Responding to spatial and temporal variations in predation risk: space use of a game species in a changing landscape of fear. Can. J. Zool. 87(12): 1129-1137. doi:10.1139/Z09-101.
80. Valeix, M., Loveridge, A.J., Chamaille-Jammes, S., Davidson, Z., Murindagomo, F., Fritz, H., and Macdonald, D.W. 2009. Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use. Ecology, 90(1): 23-30. doi:10.1890/08-0606.1. PMID:19294909.
81. VerCauteren, K.C., Shivik, J.A., and Lavelle, M.J. 2005. Efficacy of an animalactivated frightening device on urban elk and mule deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 33(4): 1282-1287. doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1282:EOAAFD]2.0.CO;2.
82. Williams, S.C., Denicola, A.J., Almendinger, T., and Maddock, J. 2012. Evaluation of organized hunting as a management technique for overabundant whitetailed deer in suburban landscapes. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 37(1): 137-145. doi:10.1002/wsb.236.
83. Woolf, A., and Roseberry, J.L. 1998. Deer management: our profession’s symbol of success or failure? Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26(3): 515-521.
84. Zanette, L.Y., White, A.F., Allen, M.C., and Clinchy, M. 2011. Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science, 334(6061): 1398-1401. doi:10.1126/science.1210908. PMID:22158817.
85. Zeileis, A., and Hothorn, T. 2002. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News, 2(3): 7-10. Available from http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/[accessed 22 August 2014].