Craft vs. industrial: Habits, attitudes and motivations towards beer consumption in Mexico

Appetite

Volumn 96, Issue , 2016, Pages 358-367

  Gómez Corona, Carlos ^a   Escalona Buendía, Héctor B ^a   García, Mauricio ^b   Chollet, Sylvie ^c   Valentin, Dominique ^d  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

^b Phenoma Targetting Lab   (Mexico)

^c Université de Lille 1 Sciences et Technologies   (France)

^d CENTRE DES SCIENCES DU GOÛT ET DE L ALIMENTATION   (France)

Author keywords

Consumer ethnography; Consumer habits; Craft beer; Drinking experience

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; AGAVE TEQUILANA; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AWARENESS; BEER; BRANDY; CONSUMER; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRAFT BEER; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ETHNOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INCOME; INDUSTRIAL BEER; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MALE; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PULQUE; RED WINE; RUM; SEX DIFFERENCE; VODKA; WHISKEY; WHITE WINE; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; FOOD PREFERENCE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; BEER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84944224552     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aquilani B., Laureti T., Poponi S., Secondi L. Beer choice and consumption determinants when craft beers are tasted: an exploratory study of consumer preferences. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 41:214-224.
2. Barbour R.S. Checklist for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?. Education and Debate 2001, 322:1115-1117.
3. Betsch T., Haberstroh S., Molter B., Glöckner A. Oops, I did it again - relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2004, 93:62-74.
4. Brewers Association, consulted in October, 2014. http://www.brewersassociation.org/statistics/craft-brewer-defined/.
5. Caporale G., Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:271-278.
6. Carú A., Cova B. Consuming experience 2007, Routledge, UK.
7. Choi D.Y., Stack M.H. The all-American beer: a case of inferior standard (taste) prevailing?. Business Horizons 2005, 48:79-86.
8. Crowford A. Attitudes about alcohol: a general review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1987, 19:279-311.
9. Daems V., Delvaux F. Multivariate analysis of descriptive sensory data on 40 commercial beers 1997, Vol. 8:373-380.
10. Dalli D., Romani S. Consumption experience and product meanings: pasta for young Italian consumers. Consuming experience 2007, Routledge, UK. A. Carú, B. Cova (Eds.).
11. Darpy D. Comportements du consommateur 2012, Dunod, Paris.
12. Dibsdall L.A., Lambert N., Frewer L.J. Using interpretative phenomenology to understand the food-related experiences and beliefs of a select group of low-income UK women. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2002, 34:298-309.
13. Eatough V., Smith J.A. I feel like a scrambled egg in my head: an idiographic case study of meaning making and anger using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The British Psychological Society 2006, 79:115-135.
14. Elliott R., Jankel-Elliott N.J. Using ethnography in strategic consumer research. Qualitative Market Research 2003, 6(4):215-223.
15. Escofier B., Pagès J. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Objectifs, méthodes et interprétation 2008, Dunod, Paris.
16. Euromonitor International Global alcoholic drinks: Beer - Opportunities in niche categories 2009, Euromonitor International, London, Retrieved from Euromonitor database.
17. Euromonitor International Artisanal alcoholic drinks: Increasingly an option for Mexican consumers 2013, Euromonitor International, London, Retrieved from Euromonitor Passport database.
18. Euromonitor International Beer in Mexico 2014, Euromonitor International, London, Retrieved from Euromonitor Passport database.
19. Ferrándiz F. Etnografías contemporáneas. Anclajes, métodos y claves para el futuro 2011, ANTHROPOS, México DF.
20. Fishler C. Food, self and identity. Social Science Information 1988, 27(2):275-292.
21. Galmarini M.V.R., Symoneaux R., Chollet S., Zamora M.C. Understanding apple consumers' expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study. Appetite 2013, 62:27-36.
22. Guinard J.X., Souchard A., Picot M., Rogeaux M., Sieffermann J.M. Sensory determinants of the thirst-quenching character of beer. Appetite 1998, 31:101-115.
23. Heath D.B. Anthropology and alcohol studies: current issues. Annual Review of Anthropology 1987, 16:99-120.
24. Johansson G. Anthropology of drinking. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Science 2001, 3846-3948.
25. Langdridge D. Phenomenological psychology. Theory, research and method 2007, PEARSON Prentice Hall, Glasgow, UK.
26. Lebart L., Piron M., Morineau A. Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle. Visualisation et inference en fouille de données 2006, Dunod, Paris.
27. Lelièvre M., Chollet S., Abdi H., Valentin D. What is the validity of the sorting task for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:697-703.
28. Lo Monaco G., Guimelli C. Représentations sociales, pratique de consommation et niveau de connaissance : le cas du vin. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 2008, 78:35-50.
29. López Romo H. Actualización regla AMAI NSE 8*7 2011, Congreso AMAI 2011, México DF, Mexico.
30. Mariampolski H. The power of ethnography. Journal of the Market Research Society 1999, 4(1):75-92.
31. Mejlholm O., Martens M. Beer identity in Denmark. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:108-115.
32. Nield K., Peacock G. Competition in the U.K. beer market: further intervention in the U.K. beer market mar produce a brand oriented market at the expense of competition and consumer choice. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2005, 14(2):103-106.
33. Ouellette J.A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:54-74.
34. Pink S. Doing sensory ethnography 2009, Sage, London.
35. Riet J., Sijtsema S.J., Dagevos H., De Bruijn G. The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research. Appetite 2011, 57:585-596.
36. Roos G., Prättälä R., Koski K. Men, masculinity and food: interviews with finnish carpenters and engineers. Appetite 2001, 37:47-56.
37. Sáenz-Navajas M.P., Ballester J., Peyron D., Valentin D. Extrinsic attributes responsible for red wine quality perception: a cross-cultural study between France and Spain. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 35:70-85.
38. Sester C., Dacremont C., Deroy O., Valentin D. Investigating consumers' representations of beers through a free association task: a comparison between packaging and blind conditions. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:475-483.
39. Shaw R. Interpretative phenonemological analysis. Doing qualitative research in psychology | A practical guide 2010, SAGE, UK. M. Forretser (Ed.).
40. Sheeran P., Aarts H., Custers R., Rivis A., Webb T.L., Coocke R. The goal-dependent automaticity of drinking habits. British Journal of Social Psychology 2005, 44:47-63.
41. Symoneaux R., Galmarini M.V., Mehinagic E. Comment analysis of consumer's likes and dislikes as an alternative tool to preference mapping. A case study on apples. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:59-66.
42. Valentin D., Chollet S., Beal S., Patris B. Expertise and memory for beers and beer olfactory compounds. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:776-785.
43. Valtonen A., Markuksela V., Moisander J. Doing sensory ethnography in consumer research. International Journal of Consumer Studies 2010, 34:375-380.
44. Wood W., Neal D.T. The habitual consumer. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2009, 19:579-592.