Small polyps at endoluminal CT colonography are often seen but ignored by radiologists

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 205, Issue 4, 2015, Pages W424-W431

  Plumb, Andrew A ^a   Fanshawe, Thomas R ^b   Phillips, Peter ^c   Mallett, Susan ^b   Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Helbren, Emma ^a   Boone, Darren ^d   Halligan, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^d ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D; Colonic polyps; Colorectal neoplasms; CT colonography; Imaging; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EYE TRACKING; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIOLOGIST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTOR;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84943650284     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.14093     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Halligan S. CT colonography for investigation of patients with symptoms potentially suggestive of colorectal cancer: A review of the UK SIGGAR trials. Br J Radiol 2013; 86:20130137
2. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237:893-904
3. Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al.; SIGGAR Investigators. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381:1185-1193
4. Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al.; SIGGAR Investigators. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 381:1194-1202
5. Krupinski EA. Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010; 72:1205-1217
6. Phillips P, Boone D, Mallett S, et al. Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: technical description and proposed metrics for analysis. Radiology 2013; 267:924-931
7. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006; 131:1690-1699
8. Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study. Radiology 2011; 258:469-476
9. Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology 2010; 256:827-835
10. Summers RM, Handwerker LR, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population. AJR 2008; 191:168-174
11. Regge D, Della Monica P, Galatola G, et al. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology 2013; 266:168-176
12. Taylor SA, Robinson C, Boone D, et al. Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computeraided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography. Radiology 2009; 253:715-723
13. Helbren E, Fanshawe TR, Phillips P, et al. The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:1570-1578
14. Mallett S, Phillips P, Fanshawe TR, et al. Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT colonography: visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers. Radiology 2014; 273:783-792
15. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an opensource software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17:205-216
16. Summers RM. Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know? Radiology 2010; 255:707-720
17. Helbren E, Halligan S, Phillips P, et al. Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: A study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography. Br J Radiol 2014; 87:20130614
18. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 2005; 235:495-502
19. Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, et al. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 2007; 244:165-173
20. Slater A, Taylor SA, Tam E, et al. Reader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for training. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:2275-2283
21. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200
22. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR 2009; 193:40-46
23. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: A consensus proposal. Radiology 2005; 236:3-9
24. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31:210-217
25. Pox CP, Altenhofen L, Brenner H, et al. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 142:1460-1467
26. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Leung WK, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1403-1412
27. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002; 12:1-9