Tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal three-dimensional CT colonography: Visual perception of experienced and inexperienced readers

Radiology

Volumn 273, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 783-792

  Mallett, Susan ^a   Phillips, Peter ^b   Fanshawe, Thomas R ^a   Helbren, Emma ^c   Boone, Darren ^c   Gale, Alastair ^d   Taylor, Stuart A ^c   Manning, David ^e   Altman, Douglas G ^a   Halligan, Steve ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RADIOLOGIST; READING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON POLYP; EYE MOVEMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VIDEORECORDING; VISION;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84916600621     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132896     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA. Searching for lung nodules. Visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol 1989;24(6):472-478
2. Krupinski EA. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 1996;3(2):137-144
3. Hu CH, Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA, Toto LC. Searching for bone fractures: A comparison with pulmonary nodule search. Acad Radiol 1994;1(1):25-32
4. Phillips P, Boone D, Mallett S, et al. Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: Technical description and proposed metrics for analysis. Radiology 2013;267(3): 924-931
5. Badiani S, Hernandez ST, Karandikar S, Roy-Choudhury S. CT Colonography to exclude colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(10):2029-2038
6. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237(3):893-904
7. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359(12):1207-1217
8. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13(1):55-64
9. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: Multicenter study. Radiology 2007;242(1): 152-161
10. Boone D, Halligan S, McQuillan J, Taylor SA, Altman D, Mallett S. Assessment of the relative benefit of computer-aided detection (CAD) for interpretation of CT colonography by experienced and inexperienced readers. 2013 awaiting submission
11. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: Assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1690-1699
12. Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: Multiobserver study. Radiology 2011;258(2):469-476
13. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D. Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decisionmaking in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 1978;13(3):175-181
14. Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics 1987;7(6): 1241-1250
15. Nodine CF, Mello-Thoms C, Kundel HL, Weinstein SP. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(4):917-923
16. Lund PJ, Krupinski EA, Pereles S, Mockbee B. Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: Assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma. Acad Radiol 1997;4(8):570-576
17. Helbren E, Halligan S, Phillips P, et al. Towards a framework for analysis of eyetracking studies in the three dimensional environment: A study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography. Br J Radiol 2014;87(1037): 20130614
18. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30(4):377-399
19. Nodine CF, Kundel HL, Lauver SC, Toto LC. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Acad Radiol 1996;3(12):1000-1006
20. Drew T, Vo ML, Olwal A, Jacobson F, Seltzer SE, Wolfe JM. Scanners and drillers: Characterizing expert visual search through volumetric images. J Vis 2013;13(10).