False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: Multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions

Radiology

Volumn 235, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 495-502

  Seong, Ho Park ^a   Hyun, Kwon Ha ^a   Kim, Min Jeong ^a,b   Kyoung, Won Kim ^a   Ah, Young Kim ^a   Dong, Hyun Yang ^a   Lee, Moon Gyu ^a   Pyo, Nyun Kim ^a   Yong, Moon Shin ^a   Yang, Suk Kyun ^a   Myung, Seung Jae ^a   Young, Il Min ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Hallym University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLON DILATATION; COLON INJURY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 20244374240     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352040606     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, Lange NL, Lui YW. Filling defects at CT colonography: pseudo and diminutive lesions (the good), polyps (the bad), flat lesions, masses, and carcinomas (the ugly). Radio-Graphics 2003; 23:1073-1091.
2. Johnson CD, Dachman AH. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 2000; 216:331-341.
3. Morrin MM, LaMont JT. Screening virtual colonoscopy-ready for prime time? N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2261-2264.
4. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasm: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002; 224:383-392.
5. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut 2002; 51:207-211.
6. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219:685-692.
7. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Favero CD, Minoli G. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:394-400.
8. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS. CT colonography: single versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001; 219:461-465.
9. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1496-1503.
10. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125:311-319.
11. Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:309-313.
12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191-2200.
13. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216:704-711.
14. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:881-889.
15. Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H, et al. Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multi-detector computed tomography colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27:132-139.
16. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:989-995.
17. Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-dimensional and three dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1543-1549.
18. Laks S, Macari M, Bini EJ. Positional change in colon polyps at CT colonography. Radiology 2004; 231:761-766.
19. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000; 355:1211-1214.
20. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:292-300.
21. Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992; 48:577-585.
22. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:2543-2549.
23. Wolber RA, Owen DA. Flat adenomas of the colon. Hum Pathol 1991; 22:70-74.
24. Zalis ME, Hahn PF. Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:646-648.
25. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results - polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002; 224:393-403.
26. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:799-805.
27. Dachman AH, Zalis ME. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 2004; 230:319-323.
28. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size: are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001; 167:777-781.
29. Glick S. Double-contrast barium enema for colorectal cancer screening: a review of the issues and a comparison with other screening alternatives. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:1529-1537.
30. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36:2251-2270.
31. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:24-28.