The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography

European Radiology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1570-1578

  Helbren, Emma ^a   Fanshawe, Thomas R ^b   Phillips, Peter ^c   Mallett, Susan ^b   Boone, Darren ^d   Gale, Alastair ^e   Altman, Douglas G ^b   Taylor, Stuart A ^a   Manning, David ^f   Halligan, Steve ^a,g  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^d IPSWICH HOSPITAL NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colonography, Computed tomographic; Computer tomographic Colonography; CT colonography; Diagnosis, Computer assisted; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA PROCESSING; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; WORK EXPERIENCE; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; BIOMARKERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84930008073     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3569-z     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG et al (2008) Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 359:1675–1684
2. Mazzone PJ, Obuchowski N, Phillips M, Risius B, Bazerbashi B, Meziane M (2013) Lung cancer screening with computer aided detection chest radiography: design and results of a randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 8:e59650
3. Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG et al (2011) Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study. Radiology 258:469–476
4. Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW et al (2010) Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology 256:827–835
5. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S et al (2006) Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131:1690–1699
6. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D et al (2006) Computer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:696–702
7. Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB (2010) Colorectal polyps: stand-alone performance of computer-aided detection in a large asymptomatic screening population. Radiology 256:791–798
8. Taylor SA, Greenhalgh R, Ilangovan R et al (2008) CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population. Radiology 247:133–140
9. Phillips P, Boone D, Mallett S et al (2013) Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: technical description and proposed metrics for analysis. Radiology 267:924–931
10. Krupinski EA, Berbaum KS (2009) The Medical Image Perception Society update on key issues for image perception research. Radiology 253:230–233
11. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Krupinski EA (1990) Computer-displayed eye position as a visual aid to pulmonary nodule interpretation. Invest Radiol 25:890–896
12. Tourassi GD, Mazurowski MA, Harrawood BP, Krupinski EA (2010) Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography. Med Phys 37:5728–5736
13. Krupinski EA, Nodine CF, Kundel HL (1993) A perceptually based method for enhancing pulmonary nodule recognition. Invest Radiol 28:289–294
14. Drew T, Cunningham C, Wolfe JM (2012) When and why might a computer-aided detection (CAD) system interfere with visual search? An eye-tracking study. Acad Radiol 19:1260–1267
15. Helbren E, Halligan S, Phillips P et al. (2014) Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three-dimensional environment: A study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT Colonography. Br J Radiol. doi:10.1259/bjr.20130614
16. Hock D, Ouhadi R, Materne R et al (2008) Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection. Radiology 248:860–868
17. Regge D, Della Monica P, Galatola G et al (2013) Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology 266:168–176
18. Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C et al (2014) Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection. Invest Radiol 49:173–182