CT colonography: False-negative interpretations

Radiology

Volumn 244, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 165-173

  Doshi, Taral ^a   Rusinak, David ^a   Halvorsen, Robert A ^b   Rockey, Don C ^c   Suzuki, Kenji ^a   Dachman, Abraham H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34250831617     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441061122     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496-1503.
2. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001;219:685-692.
3. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200.
4. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparisons with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2002;34(6):441-446.
5. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computer tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713-1719.
6. Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003;125(2):311-319.
7. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305-311.
8. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11(7):750-756.
9. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT Colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236(1):3-9.
10. Pickhardt PJ, Lee AD, McFarland EG, Taylor AJ. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. Radiology 2005;236(3):872-878.
11. Young BM, Fletcher JG, Paulsen SR, et al. Polyp measurement at CT colonography: a multi-reader, multi-workstation comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:119-121.
12. Yoshida H, Dachman AH. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 2005;30(1):26-41.
13. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Toledano A, et al. ACRIN 6664: lessons for CT colonography training and certification [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2005;470.:
14. Bodily KD, Fletcher JG, Engelby T, et al. Nonradiologists as second readers for intraluminal findings at CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2005;12(1):67-73.
15. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarthy RL, Welch TJ, Reed JE, Hara AK. CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(5):1271-1278.
16. Thompson WM, Foster WL, Paulson EK, et al. Causes of errors in polyp detection at air-contrast barium enema examination. Radiology 2006;239(1):139-148.