Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: Multicenter prospective trial

Radiology

Volumn 266, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 168-176

  Regge, Daniele ^a   Della Monica, Patrizia ^a   Galatola, Giovanni ^a   Laudi, Cristiana ^a   Zambon, Antonella ^b   Asnaghi, Roberto ^d   Correale, Loredana ^c   Barbaro, Brunella ^e   Borghi, Claudia ^f   Campanella, Delia ^a   Cassinis, Maria Carla ^g   Ferrari, Riccardo ^h   Ferraris, Andrea ^g   Golfieri, Rita ⁱ   Hassan, Cesare ^j   Iafrate, Franco ^k   Iussich, Gabriella ^a   Laghi, Andrea ^h   Massara, Roberto ^e   Neri, Emanuele ^l   Sali, Lapo ^m   Venturini, Silvia ⁿ   Gandini, Giovanni ^g   more..

^a CANDIOLO CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c Im3D SpA   (Italy)

^d IRCCS   (Italy)

^e FONDAZIONE POLICLINICO UNIVERSITARIO A GEMELLI IRCCS   (Italy)

^f VALDUCE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^h SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^j NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^k SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^l UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^m UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

ⁿ CENTRO DI RIFERIMENTO ONCOLOGICO   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COLON POLYPOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; IATROGENIC DISEASE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ALGORITHMS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84871688862     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120376     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(17):1276-1299. (Pubitemid 37160862)
2. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;375(9726):1624-1633.
3. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(6):1541-1549. (Pubitemid 351813919)
4. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134(5):1570-1595. (Pubitemid 351615355)
5. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359(12):1207-1217.
6. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 2009;301(23):2453-2461.
7. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349(23):2191-2200. (Pubitemid 37485135)
8. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 2009;58(2):241-248.
9. Heresbach D, Djabbari M, Riou F, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in a nationwide multicentre trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise. Gut 2011;60(5):658-665.
10. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008;135(4):1100-1105.
11. Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2006;355(18):1863-1872. (Pubitemid 44664644)
12. Yoo TW, Park DI, Kim YH, et al. Clinical significance of small colorectal adenoma less than 10 mm: the KASID study. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54(74):418-421.
13. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(9):638-658.
14. Chan HP, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 1987;14(4):538-548. (Pubitemid 18012504)
15. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008;359(16):1675-1684.
16. Regge D, Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography. Radiology 2009;250(2):488-497.
17. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1690-1699. (Pubitemid 44958520)
18. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA, et al. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? preliminary findings. Radiology 2007;245(1):140-149. (Pubitemid 47417797)
19. Mang T, Peloschek P, Plank C, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection as a second reader in multidetector-row CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17(10):2598-2607.
20. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 2008;246(1):148-156. (Pubitemid 350305038)
21. Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, et al. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software. Radiology 2008;246(2):463-471.
22. Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology 2010;256(3):827-835.
23. Agliozzo S, Bert A, Baggio R, et al. Validation of a CT-Colonography CAD system on the IMPACT multicenter trial data. Proc. CARS 2009, Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, Vol 4, Supp. 1.
24. Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 2004;230(2):459-464. (Pubitemid 38133807)
25. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141(5):352-359.
26. Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S, et al. Pathology and genetics. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. Tumours of digestive system: WHO classification of tumours. Lyon, France: IARC, 2000.
27. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112(1):24-28. (Pubitemid 27008981)
28. Doshi T, Rusinak D, Halvorsen RA, Rockey DC, Suzuki K, Dachman AH. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology 2007;244(1):165-173. (Pubitemid 46981971)
29. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(4):881-889. (Pubitemid 38391647)