Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: A study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 87, Issue 1037, 2014, Pages

  Helbren, E ^a   Halligan, S ^a   Phillips, P ^b   Boone, D ^a   Fanshawe, T R ^c   Taylor, S A ^a   Manning, D ^d   Gale, A ^e   Altman, D G ^c   Mallett, S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EYE TRACKER; EYE TRACKING; GAZE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OPHTHALMOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT; RADIOLOGIST; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEORECORDING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EYE MOVEMENT; RADIOLOGY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84907482151     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130614     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Manning DJ, Ethell S, Donovan T, Crawford T. How do radiologists do it? the influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography 2006; 12: 134-42.
2. Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Conant EF, Weinstein SP. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology 2007; 242: 396-402. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.2422051997
3. Ellis SM, Hu X, Dempere-Marco L, Yang GZ, Wells AU, Hansell DM. Thin-section CT of the lungs: eye-tracking analysis of the visual approach to reading tiled and stacked display formats. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59: 257-64.
4. Krupinski EA. Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 965-9. doi: 10.1016/j. acra.2005.03.071
5. Matsumoto H, Terao Y, Yugeta A, Fukuda H, Emoto M, Furubayashi T, et al. Where do neurologists look when viewing brain CT images? an eye-tracking study involving stroke cases. PLoS One 2011; 6: e28928. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0028928
6. Leong JJ, Nicolaou M, Emery RJ, Darzi AW, Yang GZ. Visual search behaviour in skeletal radiographs: a cross-specialty study. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 1069-77. doi: 10.1016/j. crad.2007.05.008
7. Phillips P, Boone D, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Altman DG, Manning D, et al. Method for tracking eye gaze during interpretation of endoluminal 3D CT colonography: technical description and proposed metrics for analysis. Radiology 2013; 267: 924-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120062
8. Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, McQuillan J, Proud M, Beddoe G, et al. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study. Radiology 2011; 258: 469-76. doi: 10.1148/ radiol.10100354
9. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, Taylor SA, Burling D, Roddie M, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1690-9. doi: 10.1053/j. gastro.2006.09.051
10. Chakraborty D, Yoon HJ, Mello-Thoms C. Spatial localization accuracy of radiologists in free-response studies: inferring perceptual FROC curves from mark-rating data. Acad Radiol 2007; 14: 4-18. doi: 10.1016/j. acra.2006.10.015
11. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011; 30: 377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067
12. Krupinski EA. Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 137-44.